Asunto(s)
Síndrome Coronario Agudo/diagnóstico , Dolor en el Pecho/etiología , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Troponina T/sangre , Dolor en el Pecho/diagnóstico , Electrocardiografía , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Femenino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Análisis Multivariante , Estudios Prospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Prospective randomized controlled trials and long-term studies are essential future directions for building -evidence-based practices in developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH), however, sufficient attrition in data (> 20%) can introduce bias deteriorating research quality. Pelvic radiography is synonymous with DDH assessment and so are -Gonadal Shield (GS) recommendations with pelvic radiography. -Nonetheless, losses to diagnostic information and inadequate protection have been increasingly implicated to GS usage, with significantly worse implications in female patients. Understandably for DDH, a disease with 80% female prevalence, the impact of GS usage on quality of radiographs and readability of radiological data may be drastic. This study aims to objectively define the implications of GS recommendations in DDH patients. METHODS: Pelvis radiographs of all DDH patients under the hip surveillance programme at a tertiary care hospital with a written protocol for GS usage were evaluated. Images were reviewed for gender, GS presence, adequate gonadal protection and obstruction of essential anatomical landmarks for pelvic indices. RESULTS: In all, 131 pelvis radiographs with DDH diagnoses (age: 1.25 to 6 years; 107 female, 24 male pelvises) were reviewed. Only 42.67% (56) of pelvis radiographs used GS despite the presence of a clear protocol. Useful anatomical landmarks were obstructed in 58.9% of radiographs with GS present. Lost diagnostic information was more common in female patients than male patients (68.1% versus 11.1%, p < 0.01). GS was ineffective at gonadal protection in 73.2% (41) of the pelvises with worse protection in female patients (78.7% vs 44.4%; p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Ironically, essential anatomy was obstructed in all the adequately protected female pelvises. Routine GS usage results in substantial attrition of radiographic data in DDH patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.