RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was a retrospective analysis of the medical records of patients who underwent surgery due to deep infiltrating rectovaginal endometriosis (mainly with the use of the 'shaving' technique). MATERIAL AND METHODS: We analysed 160 cases of patients who underwent surgery due to the deep infiltrating rectovaginal endometriosis in our ward between 2003-2014. Depending on lesion localization, disease severity and clinical characteristics, three possible ways of operation were proposed: laparoscopic, vaginal or a combined vagino-laparoscopic approach. RESULTS: A total of 120 patients underwent laparoscopic removal of the endometrial lesions, whereas 17 were operated vaginally and 23 with the use of the combined approach. Nodule resection was successfully performed in all cases. The combined vagino-laparoscopic operations were characterized by the longest operating time. The rate of perioperative complications was low in the group of patients who underwent laparoscopic or combined operations. The necessity of bowel wall suturing occurred in 15 cases. This procedure was performed in order to strengthen the bowel wall (in cases when no perforation occurred) or due to bowel resection during surgery. Unexpected bowel perforation occurred in only 5 cases. Conclusions: Vaginal, laparoscopic and the combined vagino-laparoscopic surgeries can be safely performed in cases of deep rectovaginal endometriosis.
Asunto(s)
Endometriosis/cirugía , Laparoscopía/métodos , Enfermedades del Recto/cirugía , Enfermedades Vaginales/cirugía , Adulto , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Laparoscopía/efectos adversos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Polonia , Periodo Posoperatorio , Recto/patología , Recto/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Vagina/patología , Vagina/cirugíaRESUMEN
At present the laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH) is the most widespread and most frequently executed variation of hysterectomy. It is an effective and safe operating alternative for the traditional way--abdominal hysterectomy. Good cosmetic effects, short post-operative stay at hospital and, first of all, a small risk of intra- and postoperative complications are the major driving factors justifying the choice of this method of surgery. In the following article we describe a case of a 43-year-old woman who underwent many interventions in the peritoneal cavity (abdominal surgery) and was shortlisted for the laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy. The cause of the operation was recurrent bilateral ovary cystis that could not be treated neither conservatively nor surgically, as well as the uterus myoma leading to abnormal uterus bleeding and hypermenorrhoea. Surgery in patients who have previously undergone abdominal operations is always difficult and the risk of complications is high indeed. In this case, while selecting the method of the next surgical procedure, surgeons must not exclude the vaginal and laparoscopic methods, or use them simultaneously. Experiences of other surgeons, as well as the unique case of a treated patient, show that previous abdominal surgical procedures are not a contraindication for either vaginal or laparoscopic procedures, and in some cases they might be safer than yet another laparotomy.