RESUMEN
The history of hand surgery in Indonesia began with the growing interest in performing a complicated hand surgery. Since the 1970s, hand surgery in Indonesia has made headway, especially when it comes to science and education. The development of hand surgery in Indonesia is not limited to a microsurgery area, but also covers more modern techniques, including reconstruction, minimal invasive surgery, arthroscopy, and various kinds of innovations and developments to overcome the high cost of health, especially medical devices in Indonesia. Voluntary visitations to help or take surgery procedures in many remote areas in Indonesia, such as Papua and Nusa Tenggara, have also contributed to the development of hand surgery. Currently, hand surgery in Indonesia is improving and growing significantly.
RESUMEN
Purpose: Shoulder prostheses designed and used around the world may not fit an Asian shoulder. Normal shoulder morphology in Asian population had been reported, ie, Chinese, Indian, Japanese, and Thai populations, but no data from the Indonesian population. The aim of this study was to evaluate the three-dimensional (3D) morphology of the glenohumeral joint in the normal Indonesian population, identify its normal values, and compare them with those of other populations in the literature. Patients and Methods: Images for analysis were computed tomography (CT) scans of 85 normal shoulders from 71 patients who had CT scans for another diagnosis. Morphometry of the humeral head and glenoid were measured using 3D reconstruction. Gender differences and correlations between age, height, and glenohumeral morphometry were evaluated. Indonesians' glenohumeral morphometry was compared with those of other populations in the literature. Results: In the normal Indonesian population, the mean of humeral head inclination (HHI), height (HHH), diameter in sagittal plane (DS), diameter in frontal plane (DF), radius of curvature in sagittal plane (RS), and radius of curvature in frontal plane (RF) were 134.1°, 15.6mm, 39.3mm, 41.3mm, 20.4mm, and 21.4mm, respectively. The glenoid height (GH), upper width (GUW), lower width (GLW), inclination (GI), and version (GV) mean values were 34.2mm, 18.4mm, 24.5mm, 74.0mm, and 12.3mm, respectively. There was a significant difference in HHH, DS, DF, RS, RF, GH, GUW, GLW between males and females. Except for HHI and GI, glenohumeral morphometry was correlated with patient height. Age was not correlated with any glenohumeral morphometry. Conclusion: In the Indonesian population, males had a larger humeral head and glenoid than females, and the size of the humeral head and glenoid was correlated to body height. Indonesians' humeral head and glenoid sizes were smaller than those of Western populations, but close to those of other Asian populations.
RESUMEN
Despite rapid medical technology development, various challenges exist in three- and four-part proximal humeral fracture (PHF) management. This condition has led to a notably increased use of the reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA); however, open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) is still the most widely performed procedure. Thus, these two modalities are crucial and require further discussion. We aim to compare the outcomes of three- or four-part PHF surgeries using ORIF and RTSA based on direct/head-to-head comparative studies.We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis based on the Cochrane handbook and PRISMA guidelines. We searched MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase (Ovid), and CENTRAL (Cochrane Library) from inception to October 2020. Our protocol was registered at PROSPERO (registration number CRD42020214681). We assessed the individual study risk of bias using ROB 2 and ROBINS-I tools, then appraised our evidence using the GRADE approach.Six head-to-head comparative studies were included, comprising one RCT and five retrospective case-control studies. We found that RTSA significantly improved forward flexion but was comparable to ORIF in abduction (p = 0.03 and p = 0.47, respectively) and more inferior in external rotation (p < 0.0001). Moreover, RTSA improved the overall Constant-Murley score, but the difference was not significant (p = 0.22). Interestingly, RTSA increased complications (by 42%) but reduced the revision surgery rates (by 63%) compared to ORIF (p = 0.04 and p = 0.02, respectively).RTSA is recommended to treat patients aged 65 years or older with a three- or four-part PHF. Compared to ORIF, RTSA resulted in better forward flexion and Constant-Murley score, equal abduction, less external rotation, increased complications but fewer revision surgeries. Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2021;6:941-955. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.6.210049.