RESUMEN

Background: Risk factors are traits or behaviors that have an influence on the development of breast cancer (BC). Awareness of the prevalent risk factors can guide in developing prevention interventions. Purpose: To evaluate the correlation between the breast density, body mass index, and the risk of breast cancer development in relation to the menopausal status in a native African-Arab population. Material and methods: The study included 30,443 screened females who were classified into cancer and non-cancer groups and each group was further sub-classified into pre- and postmenopausal groups. The breast density (BD) was reported and subjectively classified according to the 2013 ACR BI-RADS breast density classification. The weight and height were measured, and the body mass index (BMI) was calculated and classified according to the WHO BMI classification. Results: A statistically significant difference was calculated between the mean BMI in the cancer and non-cancer groups (p: .027) as well as between the pre- and postmenopausal groups (p < .001). A positive statistically insignificant correlation was calculated between the breast density and the risk of breast cancer in the premenopausal group (OR: 1.062, p: .919) and a negative highly significant correlation was calculated in the postmenopausal group (OR: 0.234, p < .001). Conclusion: BMI and BD are inversely associated with each other. The current studied population presented unique ethnic characteristics, where a decreased BD and an increased BMI were found to be independent risk factors for developing breast cancer.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical performance of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM) on asymmetries detected on a mammogram (MG). METHODS: This study was approved by the Scientific Research Review Board of the Radiology Department, and waiver of informed consent was applied for the uses of data of the included cases. The study included 125 female patients,33 (26.4%) who presented for screening and 92 (73.6%) who presented for a diagnostic MG. All had breast asymmetries on MG. Ultrasound examination and CESM using dual-energy acquisitions were performed for all patients. RESULTS: In all, 88/125 (70.4%) females had focal asymmetry (seen in two views and occupying less than a quadrant), 26/125 (20.8%) had global asymmetry (occupying more than one quadrant), 10/125 (8%) had asymmetry (seen in a single view and occupying less than a quadrant), and 1/125 had developing asymmetry (0.8%) (not present in the previous MG). Malignant lesions represented 91 cases, benign lesions represented 30 cases, and 4 cases were high-risk lesions. CESM sensitivity was 100% (v s 97.8 % for sono-mammography), specificity was 55.88% (v s 81.8% for sono-mammography), and the positive- and negative-predictive values were 85.85 and 100% (v s 93.7 and 93% for sono-mammography respectively) . CONCLUSION: In our study, we conclude that focal and global asymmetries with other suspicious mammographic findings were statistically significant for malignancy and CESM played an important role in delineating tumor size and extension. Any non-enhancing asymmetrical density correlated with a benign pathology, if not associated with other suspicious imaging findings. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE:: Our study is the first to explore the added value of CESM to asymmetries detected in screening and diagnostic mammography.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the morphology and enhancement characteristics of breast lesions on contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM) and to assess their impact on the differentiation between benign and malignant lesions. MATERIALS AND METHOD: This ethics committee approved study included 168 consecutive patients with 211 breast lesions over 18 months. Lesions classified as non-enhancing and enhancing and then the latter group was subdivided into mass and non-mass. Mass lesions descriptors included: shape, margins, pattern and degree of internal enhancement. Non-mass lesions descriptors included: distribution, pattern and degree of internal enhancement. The impact of each descriptor on diagnosis individually assessed using Chi test and the validity compared in both benign and malignant lesions. The overall performance of CESM were also calculated. RESULTS: The study included 102 benign (48.3%) and 109 malignant (51.7%) lesions. Enhancement was encountered in 145/211 (68.7%) lesions. They further classified into enhancing mass (99/145, 68.3%) and non-mass lesions (46/145, 31.7%). Contrast uptake was significantly more frequent in malignant breast lesions (p value ≤ 0.001). Irregular mass lesions with intense and heterogeneous enhancement patterns correlated with a malignant pathology (p value ≤ 0.001). CESM showed an overall sensitivity of 88.99% and specificity of 83.33%. The positive and negative likelihood ratios were 5.34 and 0.13 respectively. CONCLUSION: The assessment of the morphology and enhancement characteristics of breast lesions on CESM enhances the performance of digital mammography in the differentiation between benign and malignant breast lesions.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Diagnosis of breast cancer in young individuals (younger than 40 years old) poses a real challenge to breast radiologists because their breast tissue is often denser than the breast tissue of older women. Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) may be particularly helpful in such situations. The American Cancer Society (ACS) recommended breast MRI screening as an adjunct to mammography for: BRCA mutation carriers and their first-degree relatives; women with a lifetime breast cancer risk ≥20% to 25%; women with a history of chest radiation between ages of 10 and 30 years; and women with predisposing genetic syndromes. Currently, breast MRI demonstrates a high sensitivity in the range of 93-100%. As many benign lesions also show enhancement or other atypical features on MRI, the primary weakness of contrast enhanced MRI remains in its low specificity, reported to be in the range of 37-97%. Breast MRI is helpful in demonstrating the true tumor size initially, as well as identifying residual tumor following the completion of neo-adjuvant therapy. In general, sensitivities ranging from 61% to 86% for detecting residual disease have been reported. The absence of enhancement virtually excludes a recurrence and the presence of enhancement is very specific for tumor even in the radiated breast. MRI is also the preferred modality for assessment of the breast after re- constructive surgery. The role of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) in breast diagnosis will continue to evolve as technology improves and clinical experience with new techniques expands.