Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Eur Radiol ; 13(9): 2067-74, 2003 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12928957

RESUMEN

Our objectives were to evaluate the safety of intravenous 1.0-M gadobutrol injections in patients with an indication for contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (CE MRA) of supra-aortal, pelvic, or peripheral arteries by examining and assessing adverse events, laboratory values, vital signs and ECG findings for clinical significance. In 435 patients, recruited in three multicenter trials for safety evaluations of the new contrast agent 1.0-M gadobutrol, CE MRA was performed with 1.0- to 1.5-T scanners using three-dimensional gradient-echo sequences and phased-array coils. The study population comprised 312 men and 123 women with a mean age of 60.9 years. Two hundred seven patients had an indication for imaging of body arteries and 228 had an indication for imaging of peripheral arteries. Blood laboratory values and urinalysis results of 124 patients as well as heart rate, blood pressure, and 12-lead-electrocardiogram readings of 93 patients obtained during a follow-up period of up to 72 h after the injection of contrast media were available for safety analysis. Contrast media application was performed as intravenous bolus injection of 1.0-M gadobutrol in fixed doses according to the patients' body weight (b.w.) and indication for CE MRA and was followed by a 20- to 40-ml saline flush. Mean dose actually applied was 0.1 0.27 mmol/kg b.w. Flow rate ranged between 0.2 and 2.0 ml/s. Safety evaluations found a good tolerability with only 4.6% of at least "possibly related" adverse reactions and no clinically relevant changes in blood and urine samples including no transmetallation effect on serum zinc values. Analysis of renal tolerance showed no influence on renal function irrespective of preexisting renal impairment. The ECG analysis (rhythm analysis, pace-setting disturbances, conduction disturbances, and time interval measurements, including uncorrected and corrected QT) showed no clinically relevant effect of the injection of 1.0-M gadobutrol on the cardiac conduction system. Intravenous injection of 1.0-M gadobutrol at a dose of up to 0.1 0.27 mmol/kg b.w. in the indication CE MRA is safe and causes no clinically relevant changes in safety parameters such as heart rate, blood pressure, blood and urine laboratory values, and cardiac conduction system.


Asunto(s)
Medios de Contraste/efectos adversos , Angiografía por Resonancia Magnética , Compuestos Organometálicos/efectos adversos , Enfermedades Vasculares/diagnóstico , Adulto , Anciano , Presión Sanguínea/efectos de los fármacos , Creatinina/sangre , Electrocardiografía/efectos de los fármacos , Femenino , Frecuencia Cardíaca/efectos de los fármacos , Humanos , Inyecciones Intravenosas , Persona de Mediana Edad , Zinc/sangre
2.
Eur Radiol ; 13(9): 2103-14, 2003 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12928960

RESUMEN

The purpose of this study was to compare moving-table three-dimensional contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (CE MRA), using 1.0-mol gadobutrol, with intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography (i.a. DSA) for evaluation of pelvic and peripheral arteries in patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease. A total of 203 patients were examined in a prospective, multi-centre study at 1.0/1.5 T. Ten vessel segments of one leg were evaluated on-site and by three independent blinded reviewers off-site. One hundred eighty-two patients were evaluable in blinded reading. For pelvis and thigh, there was statistically significant diagnostic agreement between CE MRA and i.a. DSA on-site (94%) and off-site (86-88%). Overall, for detection of clinically significant stenoses, 93% sensitivity and 90% specificity were achieved in on-site evaluation, with 71-76 and 87-93% off-site; for detection of occlusion, sensitivity and specificity on-site were 91 and 97%, with 75-82 and 94-98% off-site. Evaluation was more sensitive on-site than off-site for detection of stenoses and occlusion, whereas specificity was similar. The CE MRA with 1.0-mol gadobutrol gave results comparable to those of i.a. DSA for the larger arteries of pelvis and thigh. Results for calf arteries were compromised by spatial resolution and technical limitations.


Asunto(s)
Angiografía de Substracción Digital , Arteriopatías Oclusivas/diagnóstico , Angiografía por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Enfermedades Vasculares Periféricas/diagnóstico , Medios de Contraste , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Humanos , Aumento de la Imagen/métodos , Pierna/irrigación sanguínea , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Compuestos Organometálicos , Pelvis/irrigación sanguínea , Estudios Prospectivos , Sensibilidad y Especificidad
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA