Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Immunoassay Immunochem ; 40(6): 642-652, 2019.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31556778

RESUMEN

The objectives of this study were to investigate the usability and performance of seven visual home pregnancy tests, available in Europe. Part one of the study was home-based and involved volunteers testing a selection of four home pregnancy tests. The tests used and order of use were randomized. Part two, performed at a study site, involved volunteers reading and interpreting the results of the same selection of home pregnancy tests used in part one, but using urine standards representing early pregnancy (25 mIU/mL human chorionic gonadotropin) or a 'not pregnant' (0 mIU/mL human chorionic gonadotropin) sample. The volunteers completed a questionnaire after each test in both parts. Three of the seven tests met their accuracy/reliability claims: tests A (99.8%), B (100%), and F (97.6%) (not statistically different from the claimed 99% accuracy). The remaining four tests had accuracies/reliabilities of <99% at 81.6% (C), 89.0% (E), 92.5% (D), and 95.9% (G), respectively. Test A was the highest-rated test for each attribute tested in both settings. Test D was ranked the lowest in part one and test C was ranked lowest overall for part two. Home pregnancy tests vary in performance and usability, therefore requiring better standardization and performance evaluation in Europe.Clinical Trials Reference Number: NCT03589534.


Asunto(s)
Gonadotropina Coriónica/orina , Pruebas de Embarazo , Adulto , Europa (Continente) , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Embarazo , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Adulto Joven
2.
Womens Health (Lond) ; 15: 1745506519838363, 2019.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30924413

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: A prospective, randomized controlled trial in women seeking to conceive examined the impact of using ovulation tests on self-reported levels of stress, psychological well-being, and quality of life in women with unexplained infertility. METHOD: The test group used a home ovulation test to detect the day of ovulation, whereas the control group were provided with a predicted day of ovulation based on the average length of menstrual cycle reported during study recruitment. Volunteers collected their first morning urine samples to evaluate biochemical levels of stress (urinary cortisol and estrone-3-glucouronide) and completed questionnaires over two complete menstrual cycles. RESULTS: Overall, the use of digital ovulation tests by sub-fertile women under medical care had negligible negative effects and no detectable positive benefit on psychological well-being, according to multiple measurements of stress by questionnaire and biochemical markers. No significant differences were found between groups for all stress measures at the various study time points, except in relation to "couple concordance" where the test group scored much higher than the control group (mean difference at end of study was 21.25 (95% confidence interval: 9.25, 33.25; P = 0.0015)). The maximum difference in log cortisol: creatinine ratio between the test and control groups was -0.28 (95% confidence interval: -0.69, 0.13). CONCLUSIONS: These results do not support propositions that using digital ovulation tests can cause stress in women trying to conceive.


Asunto(s)
Infertilidad/diagnóstico , Ovulación/fisiología , Estrés Psicológico/fisiopatología , Adulto , Estrona/análogos & derivados , Estrona/orina , Femenino , Humanos , Hidrocortisona/orina , Infertilidad/orina , Ovulación/orina , Sistemas de Atención de Punto , Estudios Prospectivos , Estrés Psicológico/orina , Salud de la Mujer
3.
Reprod Health ; 12: 116, 2015 Dec 21.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26689590

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The introduction of home digital ovulation tests (OTs) has provided a simple solution for women wishing to optimise the timing of intercourse when trying to conceive. However, despite this, very little is understood about women's experiences of using these tests. METHODS: We carried out qualitative, semi-structured telephone interviews with women who were seeking to conceive (not actively undergoing clinical investigation/fertility treatment) from the general UK population. The interviews were conducted following participation in a randomised controlled trial (RCT) in which participants were either provided with digital home OTs to assist in timing intercourse (n = 18) or advised to have intercourse every 2-3 days (n = 18). The interviews were digitally recorded, transcribed and then analysed using Framework analysis to identify the themes. RESULTS: Data saturation was reached after 36 interviews. The use of the OT appeared to elicit 10 key themes, which could be described within the context of three overarching issues: 1) a positive impact (understanding the menstrual cycle, confirming when ovulating, emotional support, improving the relationship), 2) a negative impact (changing sex life and relationship with their partner, the emotional consequences of prolonged use, questions and uncertainty about what their results mean for them) and 3) the experiences of trying to conceive in general (use of clinical guidance and emotional experience). CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the use of home OTs were found to affect women's thoughts and feelings in multiple ways during attempts to conceive. Although some women reported a range of negative experiences when using OTs, they also reported similar negative experiences when trying to conceive without using the tests. However, there were many positive themes associated with OT use, including an increased understanding of the menstrual cycle, confirmation of ovulation timing and providing a source of help and support when trying to conceive. Overall, when women are trying to conceive, ensuring they have access to high-quality information, including use of OT, may be of benefit to help address some of the questions and uncertainties that were raised by the participants in this study. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01084304.


Asunto(s)
Actitud Frente a la Salud , Detección de la Ovulación/psicología , Adulto , Femenino , Fertilidad/fisiología , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Humanos , Infertilidad Femenina/psicología , Infertilidad Femenina/terapia , Entrevistas como Asunto , Ciclo Menstrual/fisiología , Detección de la Ovulación/efectos adversos , Detección de la Ovulación/métodos , Investigación Cualitativa , Conducta Sexual , Estrés Psicológico/etiología , Estrés Psicológico/prevención & control , Adulto Joven
4.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26018113

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to examine relationships and interindividual variations in urinary and serum reproductive hormone levels relative to ultrasound-observed ovulation in menstrual cycles of apparently normally menstruating women. METHODS: This was a prospective study of normally menstruating women (no known subfertility), aged 18-40 years (n = 40), who collected daily urine samples and attended the study centre for blood samples and transvaginal ultrasound during one complete menstrual cycle. Serum luteinising hormone (LH), progesterone, estradiol, urinary LH, pregnanediol-3- glucuronide (P3G) and estrone-3-glucuronide were measured. Ultrasound was conducted by two physicians and interpreted by central expert review. RESULTS: Menstrual cycle length varied from 22 to 37 days (median 27 days). Ovulation by ultrasound ranged from day 8 to day 26 (median day 15). Serum and urinary hormone profiles showed excellent agreement. Estrogen and LH hormone peaks in urine and serum showed a range of signal characteristics across the study group before and after ovulation. The rise in estrogen and LH always occurred before ovulation; the progesterone rise from baseline always occurred after ovulation. CONCLUSIONS: Urinary and serum reproductive hormones showed excellent agreement and may be used interchangeably. The beginning of the surge in serum and urinary LH was an excellent predictor of ovulation. The rise in progesterone and P3G above baseline was a consistent marker of luteinisation confirming ovulation. Both LH and progesterone surges delivered clear, sharp signals in all volunteers, allowing reliable detection and confirmation of ovulation.


Asunto(s)
Ciclo Menstrual/sangre , Ciclo Menstrual/orina , Detección de la Ovulación/métodos , Ovulación/sangre , Ovulación/orina , Adolescente , Adulto , Biomarcadores/sangre , Biomarcadores/orina , Endosonografía , Estradiol/sangre , Estrona/análogos & derivados , Estrona/orina , Femenino , Humanos , Hormona Luteinizante/sangre , Hormona Luteinizante/orina , Monitoreo Fisiológico/métodos , Folículo Ovárico/diagnóstico por imagen , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Pregnanodiol/análogos & derivados , Pregnanodiol/orina , Progesterona/sangre , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de Tiempo , Adulto Joven
5.
Clin Chem Lab Med ; 53(7): 1099-108, 2015 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25720077

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Urinary hormone level analysis provides valuable fertility status information; however, previous studies have not referenced levels to the ovulation day, or have used outdated methods. This study aimed to produce reproductive hormone ranges referenced to ovulation day determined by ultrasound. METHODS: Women aged 18-40 years (no reported infertility) collected daily urine samples for one complete menstrual cycle. Urinary luteinising hormone (LH), estrone-3-glucuronide (E3G, an estradiol metabolite), follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) and pregnanediol-3-glucuronide (P3G, a progesterone metabolite) were measured using previously validated assays. Volunteers underwent trans-vaginal ultrasound every 2 days until the dominant ovarian follicle size reached 16 mm, when daily scans were performed until ovulation was observed. Data were analysed to create hormone ranges referenced to the day of objective ovulation as determined by ultrasound. RESULTS: In 40 volunteers, mean age 28.9 years, urinary LH surge always preceded ovulation with a mean of 0.81 days; thus LH is an excellent assay-independent predictor of ovulation. The timing of peak LH was assay-dependent and could be post-ovulatory; therefore should no longer be used to predict/determine ovulation. Urinary P3G rose from baseline after ovulation in all volunteers, peaking a median of 7.5 days following ovulation. Median urinary peak E3G and FSH levels occurred 0.5 days prior to ovulation. A persistent rise in urinary E3G was observed from approximately 3 days pre- until 5 days post-ovulation. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides reproductive hormone ranges referenced to the actual day of ovulation as determined by ultrasound, to facilitate examination of menstrual cycle endocrinology.


Asunto(s)
Hormonas/orina , Ovulación , Urinálisis/normas , Adolescente , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Valores de Referencia , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA