RESUMEN

Porn production, like all forms of labour, entails certain occupational health and safety (OHS) risks. Porn production has generally not been subject to state occupational health oversight, and porn workers have instead implemented self-regulatory OHS systems. However, in California, where the industry is most established, governmental and non-governmental bodies have made several paternalist attempts to legislate standardised OHS protocols. Their proposed legislation exceptionalises sex work as uniquely dangerous while failing to tailor guidance to the specific needs of and practices associated with porn work. This is largely because: 1) regulators are ignorant of porn's self-regulatory processes; 2) industry self-regulation conceptualises the occupational hazard on porn sets as infectious bodily fluids, whereas external regulators perceive the hazard as sex itself; and 3) regulators devalue porn work and so do not take the viability of the labour into account when evaluating protocol effectiveness. Using critical-interpretive medical anthropology involving fieldwork and interviews with porn workers and a critical analysis of porn OHS texts, I argue that porn health protocols should be left to industry self-determination, to be developed by porn workers rather than for them.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Objective: The objective of this study was to better understand how rurality impacts the knowledge, diagnosis and management of vulvodynia by primary care providers (PCPs) practising in the geographically disparate province of Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada. Design: This was a qualitative case study using questionnaires and semi-structured interviews with PCPs, compared with semi-structured focus groups and interviews with vulvodynia patients conducted in a previous study phase. Results: Ten family physicians and 6 nurse practitioners participated. Over half had baseline knowledge that vulvodynia has a relatively high prevalence, but most underestimated the likelihood they would see a patient with vulvodynia in their practice. Three barriers to discussing and managing vulvodynia emerged: (1) discomfort initiating sexual/vulvar health conversations; (2) concerns about protecting patient privacy and confidentiality; and (3) time constraints and building therapeutic relationships. These issues were largely corroborated by previous findings with vulvodynia patients. Rural-informed solutions might include: (1) supporting increased education in vulvodynia and sexual health more broadly, including funding to attend continuing professional education and developing more clinical tools; (2) following practice guidelines regarding standardised initiation of sexual health conversations; (3) incentivising retention of rural providers and extending appointment times by reconsidering fee-for-service structures; and (4) researching a tailored vulvodynia toolkit and the potential advantage of mobile health units. Conclusion: Rurality exacerbates common concerns in the identification and management of vulvodynia. Acting on recommended solutions may address the impact of rurality on the provision of timely care for those experiencing vulvodynia and other sexual health concerns.

Résumé Objectif: Mieux comprendre l'impact de la ruralité sur la connaissance, le diagnostic et la prise en charge de la vulvodynie par les prestataires de soins primaires exerçant dans la province géographiquement disparate de Terre-Neuve-et-Labrador, au Canada. Conception: Étude de cas qualitative utilisant des questionnaires et des entretiens semi-structurés avec des prestataires de soins primaires, comparés à des groupes de discussion semi-structurés et à des entretiens avec des patientes atteintes de vulvodynie menés lors d'une phase précédente de l'étude. Résultats: Dix médecins de famille et six infirmières praticiennes y ont participé. Plus de la moitié d'entre eux savaient au départ que la vulvodynie a une prévalence relativement élevée, mais la plupart sous-estimaient la probabilité de voir une patiente atteinte de vulvodynie dans leur pratique. Trois obstacles à la discussion et à la prise en charge de la vulvodynie sont apparus: (1) la gêne à entamer des conversations sur la santé sexuelle/vulvaire; (2) les préoccupations relatives à la protection de la vie privée et de la confidentialité des patientes; et (3) les contraintes de temps et l'établissement de relations thérapeutiques. Ces problèmes ont été largement corroborés par les résultats obtenus précédemment avec des patientes atteintes de vulvodynie. Les solutions adaptées au milieu rural pourraient inclure (1) soutenir une meilleure formation sur la vulvodynie et la santé sexuelle en général, notamment le financement de la formation professionnelle continue et l'élaboration d'outils cliniques supplémentaires; (2) suivre les directives de pratique concernant l'amorce normalisée des conversations sur la santé sexuelle; (3) encourager la rétention des fournisseurs ruraux et prolonger les délais de rendez-vous en reconsidérant les structures de rémunération à l'acte; et 4) faire des recherches sur une trousse d'outils sur mesure pour la vulvodynie et sur l'avantage potentiel des unités de santé mobiles. Conclusion: La ruralité exacerbe les problèmes courants liés à l'identification et à la prise en charge de la vulvodynie. La mise en œuvre des solutions recommandées peut permettre de remédier à l'impact de la ruralité sur la fourniture de soins en temps opportun aux personnes souffrant de vulvodynie et d'autres problèmes de santé sexuelle. Mots-clés: Douleur vulvaire, dyspareunie, santé rurale, santé sexuelle, éducation sexuelle, structures tarifaires, administration des soins de santé, disparités géographiques dans les soins de santé, recherche qualitative, étude de cas qualitative.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Persons with vulvodynia (a chronic vulvar pain condition) suffer many barriers to diagnosis and treatment, several of which may be exacerbated by the sociocultural and geographical context in which they live. AIM: We drew on the experiences of patients with vulvodynia who were living in small urban and rural communities to learn what they perceived as the major barriers to diagnosis and treatment as well as to probe for possible solutions. METHODS: For this qualitative case study, we conducted 3 focus groups with a total of 10 participants, drawn from patients seen at our academic tertiary referral center, with a goal of understanding their lived experience with vulvodynia. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The patient dialogue was coded into themes and temporally grouped to illustrate struggles and victories in diagnosis and treatment. RESULTS: Participants confirmed that healthcare provider knowledge and attitudes as well as system challenges (specialist and allied healthcare provider availability) are major barriers to timely diagnosis. Of novel interest are other factors that exacerbate distress and delay diagnosis such as patients' inadequate knowledge of sexual functioning and sociocultural messages regarding "normal" sexual activity. Our work suggests that a disease prevention framework that includes comprehensive sexual education before or at the onset of sexual activity may be of benefit in reducing the burden of vulvodynia when added to strategies to increase healthcare provider knowledge and improve access to effective treatments. CONCLUSION: While healthcare provider knowledge and attitudes are often at the forefront of barriers to diagnosis, our study suggests that to minimize patient distress and expedite diagnosis, resources must also be directed to promoting comprehensive sexual health education. Webber V, Miller ME, Gustafson DL, et al. Vulvodynia Viewed From a Disease Prevention Framework: Insights From Patient Perspectives. Sex Med 2020;8:757-766.