RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that newborn infants cared for in hospitals with greater utilization of neonatal intensive care experienced fewer postdischarge adverse events. STUDY DESIGN: We developed 3 retrospective population-based cohorts of Texas Medicaid insured singletons born in 2010-2014 (very low birth weight [VLBW n = 11 139], late preterm [n = 57 509], and non-preterm [n = 664 447]) who received care in higher volume hospitals with level III/IV neonatal intensive care units (NICUs). Measures of NICU care were hospital-level risk adjusted NICU admission rates, special care days (days of nonroutine care) per infant, and the percent of intensive (highest billable care code) special care days. The units of analysis were hospitals (n = 80) and the primary outcome was an adverse event, (defined as admission, emergency department visit, or death) within 30 days postdischarge. RESULTS: Higher use of NICU care at a hospital level was not associated with lower postdischarge 30-day adverse event. Infants cared for in hospitals with above vs below median special care day rates experienced slightly higher postdischarge adverse event per 100 infants (VLBW: 14.01 [95% CI 12.74-15.27] vs 11.84 [10.52-13.16], P < .05; late preterm: 7.33 [6.68-7.97] vs 6.28 [5.87-6.69], P < .01; non-preterm: 4.47 [4.17-4.76] vs 3.97 [3.75-4.18], P < .01). Weak positive associations (Pearson correlations of 0.31-0.37, P < .01) were observed for adverse event with special care days; in no instance was a negative association observed between NICU utilization and adverse event. CONCLUSION: Higher utilization of NICU care was not associated with lower rates of short-term events suggesting that there may be opportunities to safely decrease admission rates and length of NICU stays.
Asunto(s)
Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Cuidado Intensivo Neonatal/estadística & datos numéricos , Utilización de Instalaciones y Servicios , Femenino , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Recien Nacido Prematuro , Recién Nacido de muy Bajo Peso , Masculino , Medicaid , Mortalidad Perinatal , Estudios Retrospectivos , Texas , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the rate of surgical procedures, anesthetic use, and imaging studies by prematurity status for the first year of life we analyzed data for Texas Medicaid-insured newborns. STUDY DESIGN: We developed a retrospective population-based live birth cohort of newborn infants insured by Texas Medicaid in 2010-2014 with 4 subcohorts: extremely premature, very premature, moderate/late premature, and term. RESULTS: In 1 102 958 infants, surgical procedures per 100 infants were 135.9 for extremely premature, 35.4 for very premature, 15.5 for moderate/late premature, and 6.5 for term. Anesthetic use was 62.0 for extremely premature, 20.8 for very premature, 11.1 for moderate/late premature, and 5.6 for the term subcohort. The most common procedures in the extremely premature were neurosurgery, intubations, and procedures that facilitated caloric intake (gastrostomy tubes and fundoplications). The annual rates for the first year of life for chest radiograph ranged from 15.0 per year for the extremely premature cohort to 0.6 for term infants and for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) from 0.3 to 0.01. MRI was the most common imaging study with anesthesia support in all maturity levels. MRIs were done in extremely premature without anesthesia in over 90% and in term infants in 57.2%. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical procedures, anesthetic use, and imaging studies in infants are common and more frequent with higher a degree of prematurity while the use of anesthesia is lower in more premature newborns. These findings can provide direction for outcome studies of surgery and anesthesia exposure.
Asunto(s)
Anestesia/estadística & datos numéricos , Diagnóstico por Imagen/estadística & datos numéricos , Edad Gestacional , Medicaid , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Operativos/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Recien Nacido con Peso al Nacer Extremadamente Bajo , Recien Nacido Extremadamente Prematuro , Recién Nacido de Bajo Peso , Recién Nacido , Recien Nacido Prematuro , Recién Nacido de muy Bajo Peso , Intubación/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Nacimiento a Término , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To assess the contribution of maternal and newborn characteristics to variation in neonatal intensive care use across regions and hospitals. STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective population-based live birth cohort of newborn infants insured by Texas Medicaid in 2010-2014 with 2 subcohorts: very low birth weight (VLBW) singletons and late preterm singletons. Crude and risk-adjusted neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission rates, intensive and intermediate special care days, and imaging procedures were calculated across Neonatal Intensive Care Regions (n = 21) and hospitals (n = 100). Total Medicaid payments were calculated. RESULTS: Overall, 11.5% of live born, 91.7% of VLBW, and 37.6% of infants born late preterm were admitted to a NICU, receiving an average of 2 days, 58 days, and 5 days of special care with payments per newborn inpatient episode of $5231, $128â075, and $10â837, respectively. There was little variation across regions and hospitals in VLBW NICU admissions but marked variation for NICU admissions in late preterm newborn infants and for special care days and imaging rates in all cohorts. The variation decreased slightly after health risk adjustment. There was moderate substitution of intermediate for intensive care days across hospitals (Pearson r VLBW -0.63 P < .001; late preterm newborn -0.53 P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Across all risk groups, the variation in NICU use was poorly explained by differences in newborn illness levels and is likely to indicate varying practice styles. Although the "right" rates are uncertain, it is unlikely that all of these use patterns represent effective and efficient care.
Asunto(s)
Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Recién Nacido de muy Bajo Peso , Unidades de Cuidado Intensivo Neonatal/estadística & datos numéricos , Medicaid/economía , Nacimiento Prematuro/mortalidad , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Costos de Hospital , Mortalidad Hospitalaria/tendencias , Humanos , Lactante , Mortalidad Infantil , Recién Nacido , Unidades de Cuidado Intensivo Neonatal/economía , Masculino , Embarazo , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Texas , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To characterize geographic variation in neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission rates across the entire birth cohort and evaluate the relationship between regional bed supply and NICU admission rates. STUDY DESIGN: This was a population-based, cross-sectional study. 2013 US birth certificate and 2012 American Hospital Association data were used to assign newborns and NICU beds to neonatal intensive care regions. Descriptive statistics of admission rates were calculated across neonatal intensive care regions. Multilevel logistic regression was used to examine the relationship between bed supply and individual odds of admission, with adjustment for maternal and newborn characteristics. RESULTS: Among 3 304 364 study newborns, the NICU admission rate was 7.2 per 100 births and varied across regions for all birth weight categories. IQRs in admission rates were 84.5-93.2 per 100 births for 500-1499 g, 35.3-46.1 for 1500-2499 g, and 3.5-5.5 for ≥2500 g. Adjusted odds of admission for newborns of very low birth weight were unrelated to regional bed supply; however, newborns ≥2500 g in regions with the highest NICU bed supply were significantly more likely to be admitted to a NICU than those in regions with the lowest (aOR 1.20 [1.03-1.40]). CONCLUSIONS: There is persistent underuse of NICU care for newborns of very low birth weight that is not associated with regional bed supply. Among larger newborns, we find evidence of supply-sensitive care, raising concerns about the potential overuse of expensive and unnecessary care. Rather than improving access to needed care, NICU expansion may instead further deregionalize neonatal care, exacerbating underuse.
Asunto(s)
Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Mal Uso de los Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Capacidad de Camas en Hospitales/estadística & datos numéricos , Unidades de Cuidado Intensivo Neonatal/estadística & datos numéricos , Cuidado Intensivo Neonatal/estadística & datos numéricos , Admisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Recién Nacido de muy Bajo Peso , Unidades de Cuidado Intensivo Neonatal/provisión & distribución , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To compare rates of typmanostomy tube insertions for otitis media with effusion with estimates of need in 2 countries. STUDY DESIGN: This cross-sectional analysis used all-payer claims to calculate rates of tympanostomy tube insertions for insured children ages 2-8 years (2007-2010) across pediatric surgical areas (PSA) for Northern New England (NNE; Maine, Vermont, and New Hampshire) and the English National Health Service Primary Care Trusts (PCT). Rates were compared with expected rates estimated using a Monte Carlo simulation model that integrates clinical guidelines and published probabilities of the incidence and course of otitis media with effusion. RESULTS: Observed rates of tympanostomy tube placement varied >30-fold across English PCT (N = 150) and >3-fold across NNE PSA (N = 30). At a 25 dB hearing threshold, the overall difference in observed to expected tympanostomy tubes provided was -3.41 per 1000 child-years in England and -0.01 per 1000 child-years in NNE. Observed incidence of insertion was less than expected in 143 of 151 PCT, and was higher than expected in one-half of the PSA. Using a 20 dB hearing threshold, there were fewer tube insertions than expected in all but 2 England and 7 NNE areas. There was an inverse relationship between estimated need and observed tube insertion rates. CONCLUSIONS: Regional variations in observed tympanostomy tube insertion rates are unlikely to be due to differences in need and suggest overall underuse in England and both overuse and underuse in NNE.
Asunto(s)
Ventilación del Oído Medio/estadística & datos numéricos , Otitis Media con Derrame/cirugía , Niño , Preescolar , Estudios Transversales , Inglaterra , Femenino , Necesidades y Demandas de Servicios de Salud , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , New EnglandRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To measure prescription use intensity and regional variation of psychotropic and 2 important nonpsychotropic drug groups among children with autism spectrum disorders (ASDs) compared with children in the general population. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study of ambulatory prescription fills from Maine, Vermont, and New Hampshire all-payer administrative data, 2007-2010. RESULTS: Overall there were 13,100 children diagnosed with ASD (34,584 person years [PYs]) and 936,721 (1.7 million PYs) without ASD diagnosis. The overall prescription fill rate was 16.6 per PY in children with ASD and 4.1 per PY in the general population. Psychotropic use among children with ASDs was 9-fold the general population rate (7.80 vs 0.85 fills per PY); these children comprised 2.0% of the pediatric population but received 15.6% of psychotropics. Nonpsychotropic drug use was also higher in the population with ASD, particularly the youngest: among those under age 3 years, antibiotic use was 2-fold and antacid use nearly 5-fold the general population rate (3.2 vs 1.4 and 1.0 vs 0.2 per PY, respectively). Among children with ASDs, prescription use varied substantially across hospital service areas, as much as 3-fold for antacids and alpha agonists, more than 4-fold for benzodiazepines (5th to 95th percentile). CONCLUSIONS: The overall psychotropic and nonpsychotropic prescription intensity among children with ASDs is characterized by broad regional variation, suggesting diverse provider responses to pharmacotherapeutic uncertainty. This variation highlights a need for more research, practice-based learning, and shared decision making with caregivers surrounding therapy for children with ASDs.