Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Más filtros











Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Dermatitis ; 28(2): 141-143, 2017.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28169850

RESUMEN

The American Contact Dermatitis Society Core Allergen Series was introduced in 2012. After 4 years of use, changes in our recommended allergens are necessary. For the updated series, we have reordered the first 4 panels to approximately mirror the current TRUE Test and removed parthenolide, triclosan, glutaraldehyde, and jasmine. Polymyxin B, lavender, sodium benzoate, ethylhexylglycerin, and benzoic acid are new additions to the American Contact Dermatitis Society series.


Asunto(s)
Alérgenos/efectos adversos , Alérgenos/inmunología , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/inmunología , Pruebas del Parche , Humanos , Pruebas del Parche/métodos
2.
Dermatitis ; 25(6): 345-55, 2014.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25384228

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Allergic contact dermatitis is common in children. Epicutaneous patch testing is an important tool for identifying responsible allergens. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to provide the patch test results from children (aged ≤18 years) examined by the North American Contact Dermatitis Group from 2005 to 2012. METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis of children patch-tested with the North American Contact Dermatitis Group 65- or 70-allergen series. Frequencies and counts were compared with previously published data (2001-2004) using χ statistics. CONCLUSIONS: A total of 883 children were tested during the study period. A percentage of 62.3% had ≥1 positive patch test and 56.7% had ≥1 relevant positive patch test. Frequencies of positive patch test and relevant positive patch test reaction were highest with nickel sulfate (28.1/25.6), cobalt chloride (12.3/9.1), neomycin sulfate (7.1/6.6), balsam of Peru (5.7/5.5), and lanolin alcohol 50% petrolatum vehicle (5.5/5.1). The ≥1 positive patch test and ≥1 relevant positive patch test in the children did not differ significantly from adults (≥19 years) or from previously tested children (2001-2004). The percentage of clinically relevant positive patch tests for 27 allergens differed significantly between the children and adults. A total of 23.6% of children had a relevant positive reaction to at least 1 supplemental allergen. Differences in positive patch test and relevant positive patch test frequencies between children and adults as well as test periods confirm the importance of reporting periodic updates of patch testing in children to enhance clinicians' vigilance to clinically important allergens.


Asunto(s)
Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/diagnóstico , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/etiología , Pruebas del Parche , Adolescente , Factores de Edad , Alérgenos , Bálsamos , Niño , Preescolar , Cobalto , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Irritantes , Masculino , Níquel , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores Sexuales , Estados Unidos
4.
s.l; s.n; 1998. 24 p. tab.
No convencional en Inglés | Sec. Est. Saúde SP, SESSP-ILSLACERVO, Sec. Est. Saúde SP | ID: biblio-1235453

RESUMEN

Coined the next major health concern of the decade, allergy to natural rubber latex affects people routinely exposed to rubber products. Groups at highest risk include health care workers, rubber industry workers, and persons who have undergone multiple surgical procedures, especially those with spina bifida. Allergy to latex is a type I, immediate, IgE-mediated reaction, which can lead to anaphylaxis and death. Much of latex research is published in allergy journals. Dermatologists may not be aware of the prevalence, symptoms, risks, diagnosis, and treatment of latex allergy. These topics are the subject of this review. Research concerning antigenic proteins, as well as sources of latex alternatives, is also summarized. (J Am Acad Dermatol 1998;39:1-24.) Learning objective: At the completion of this learning activity, participants should have a clear understanding of the history, biology, epidemiology, mechanism, clinical characteristics, diagnostic work-up, and treatment of latex allergy. Readers should also have a greater understanding of multiple potential allergenic latex proteins and their importance in preventing future latex-sensitization.


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Anafilaxia/etiología , Anafilaxia/inmunología , Goma/efectos adversos , Disrafia Espinal/cirugía , Enfermedades Profesionales/etiología , Factores de Riesgo , Hipersensibilidad Inmediata/diagnóstico , Hipersensibilidad Inmediata/etiología , Hipersensibilidad Inmediata/inmunología , Hipersensibilidad Inmediata/prevención & control , Hipersensibilidad Inmediata/terapia , Inmunoglobulina E/análisis , Industria Química , Látex/efectos adversos , Látex/inmunología , Personal de Salud , Prevalencia , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Operativos/efectos adversos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA