Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Mol Cytogenet ; 16(1): 10, 2023 Jun 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37301962

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) allows for screening of fetal aneuploidy and copy number variants (CNVs) from cell-free DNA (cfDNA) in maternal plasma. Professional societies have not yet embraced NIPT for fetal CNVs, citing a need for additional performance data. A clinically available genome-wide cfDNA test screens for fetal aneuploidy and CNVs larger than 7 megabases (Mb). RESULTS: This study reviews 701 pregnancies with "high risk" indications for fetal aneuploidy which underwent both genome-wide cfDNA and prenatal microarray. For aneuploidies and CNVs considered 'in-scope' for the cfDNA test (CNVs ≥ 7 Mb and select microdeletions), sensitivity and specificity was 93.8% and 97.3% respectively, with positive and negative predictive values of 63.8% and 99.7% as compared to microarray. When including 'out-of-scope' CNVs on array as false negatives, the sensitivity of cfDNA falls to 48.3%. If only pathogenic out-of-scope CNVs are treated as false negatives, the sensitivity is 63.8%. Of the out-of-scope CNVs identified by array smaller than 7 Mb, 50% were classified as variants of uncertain significance (VUS), with an overall VUS rate in the study of 2.29%. CONCLUSIONS: While microarray provides the most robust assessment of fetal CNVs, this study suggests that genome-wide cfDNA can reliably screen for large CNVs in a high-risk cohort. Informed consent and adequate pretest counseling are essential to ensuring patients understand the benefits and limitations of all prenatal testing and screening options.

2.
Prenat Diagn ; 41(11): 1372-1379, 2021 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33682142

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate cell-free DNA (cfDNA) redraws and pregnancy outcomes following low fetal fraction (FF) cfDNA failures, as it has been suggested that a failed cfDNA screen due to insufficient FF carries increased risk for fetal aneuploidy. METHODS: Here >200,000 consecutive samples were reviewed and >1,100 patients were identified with a failed cfDNA due to low FF using genome-wide massively parallel sequencing. Redraw results following the initial low FF failure were analyzed, as well as pregnancy outcomes for patients with repeated low FF failure on redraw. RESULTS: Upon redraw 84.2% of samples yielded a reportable result with no enrichment of aneuploidy observed (p = 0.332). Higher maternal weights and multifetal pregnancy rates were observed in samples with insufficient FF. In patients with repeated low FF failure on redraw, almost all pregnancies resulted in apparently healthy liveborns. CONCLUSION: Insufficient FF was not an indicator of aneuploidy risk or adverse pregnancy outcomes in this study. Caution should be taken in generalizing aneuploidy risk to all low FF cfDNA failures. Redrawing may be an appropriate next step, as proceeding directly with diagnostic testing for aneuploidy may be unwarranted for most patients.


Asunto(s)
Aneuploidia , Ácidos Nucleicos Libres de Células/análisis , Tamizaje Masivo/normas , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Tamizaje Masivo/métodos , Tamizaje Masivo/estadística & datos numéricos , Pruebas Prenatales no Invasivas/métodos , Pruebas Prenatales no Invasivas/normas , Pruebas Prenatales no Invasivas/estadística & datos numéricos , Embarazo , Estudios Retrospectivos
3.
Am J Med Genet A ; 182(11): 2666-2670, 2020 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32798301

RESUMEN

With the increasing capabilities of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT), detection of sub-chromosomal deletions and duplications are possible. This case series of deletion rescues resulting in segmental homozygosity helps provide a biological explanation for NIPT discrepancies and adds to the dearth of existing literature surrounding segmental UPD cases and their underlying mechanisms. In the three cases presented here, NIPT reported a sub-chromosomal deletion (in isolation or as part of a complex finding). Diagnostic testing, however, revealed segmental homozygosity or UPD for the region reported deleted on NIPT. Postnatal placental testing was pursued in two cases and confirmed the NIPT findings. This discordance between the screening and diagnostic testing is suggestive of a corrective post-zygotic event, such as telomere capture and/or deletion rescue, ultimately resulting in segmental homozygosity and fetoplacental mosaicism. Imprinted chromosomes and autosomal recessive disease genes make homozygosity an important clinical consideration. Amniocentesis with SNP microarray is particularly useful in determining both copy number and UPD issues alike.


Asunto(s)
Amniocentesis/métodos , Deleción Cromosómica , Homocigoto , Mosaicismo , Placenta/metabolismo , Diagnóstico Prenatal/métodos , Disomía Uniparental/diagnóstico , Adulto , Cromosomas Humanos Par 13/genética , Cromosomas Humanos Par 20/genética , Cromosomas Humanos Par 8/genética , Femenino , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Embarazo , Disomía Uniparental/genética , Adulto Joven
4.
PLoS One ; 14(8): e0220979, 2019.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31393959

RESUMEN

Since introducing cell-free DNA screening, Sequenom Laboratories has analyzed over 1 million clinical samples. More than 30,000 of these samples were from multifetal gestations (including twins, triplets and higher-order multiples). The clinical laboratory experience with the first 30,000 multifetal samples will be discussed. Maternal plasma samples from multifetal gestations were subjected to DNA extraction and library preparation followed by massively parallel sequencing. Sequencing data were analyzed to identify autosomal trisomies and other subchromosomal events. Fetal fraction requirements were adjusted in proportion to fetal number. Outcome data, when voluntarily received from the ordering provider, were collected from internal case notes. Feedback was received in 50 cases. The positivity rate in multifetal samples for trisomy 21 was 1.50%, 0.47% for trisomy 18, and 0.21% for trisomy 13. Average total sample fetal fraction was 12.2% at a mean gestational age of 13 weeks 6 days. Total non-reportable rate was 5.95%. Estimated performance based on ad hoc clinical feedback demonstrates that possible maximum sensitivity and specificity meet or exceed the original performance from clinical validation studies. Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) screening provides certain advantages over that of conventional screening in multifetal gestations and is available in higher-order multiples.


Asunto(s)
Aneuploidia , Ácidos Nucleicos Libres de Células/análisis , Feto/metabolismo , Tamizaje Masivo , Adulto , Deleción Cromosómica , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Embarazo , Gemelos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA