RESUMEN
Periodontal probing around natural teeth and dental implants remains an efficient and non-invasive method to diagnose loss of attachment, determine presence of diseases, monitor marginal recession, and evaluate positive treatment outcomes. Risks of probing around natural teeth and dental implants include inaccurate measurements, bacteria inoculation, spread of disease, and damage to the implant surface. Improper probing can lead to undiagnosed or overdiagnosed diseases. Some clinicians have questioned the value versus the risk of probing around implants. This article discusses the risks and advantages of probing around teeth and dental implants and suggests methods of probing intended to enable more accurate evaluation of periodontal and peri-implant conditions.
Asunto(s)
Implantes Dentales , Índice Periodontal , Guías como Asunto , Humanos , Medición de RiesgoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The aim was to identify and evaluate those surgical protocols reporting on positive clinical outcomes for treating peri-implantitis with 12 or more months of follow-up. Method of surface decontamination (SDC) was evaluated for any correlation with outcomes. RESULTS: A literature search was performed of all articles published in English between January 1, 2001 and April 30, 2015. Of the 639 identified, 26 satisfied the inclusion criteria. Outcomes reported on included reductions in bleeding on probing (BoP) and probing depth (PD), mean radiographic bone fill (RBF), and mean change in marginal soft tissue levels (MR±). Methods of SDC included mechanical debridement (MD) with and without saline use, MD plus laser or photodynamic therapy, MD with air powder abrasion, MD with chemotherapeutic implant surface decontamination, and combination approaches. The results suggested that various methods of SDC were effective. Heterogeneity of the studies made it impossible to determine correlations between clinical outcome and SDC method. Most studies over 12 months reporting better treatment outcomes employed a bone replacement. Additionally, studies where patients with periodontitis were treated before their peri-implantitis care also had better outcomes. CONCLUSION: The current review failed to reveal any correlation between any particular method for SDC or defect treatment protocol and positive clinical outcomes. Further comparative studies are warranted to determine the most appropriate approach for both of these topics.
Asunto(s)
Periimplantitis/cirugía , Protocolos Clínicos , Encía/cirugía , Humanos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Orales/métodos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
This case report utilized a patient's natural teeth as provisional restorations supported by immediately placed implants to provide a seamless transition from hopeless teeth to implant supported restorations.