Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Rofo ; 36(2): 92-101, 2015 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25912326

RESUMEN

UNLABELLED: Cardiovascular diseases remain the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in industrialized and developing countries. In clinical practice, the in-vivo identification of atherosclerotic lesions, which can lead to complications such as heart attack or stroke, remains difficult. Imaging techniques provide the reference standard for the detection of clinically significant atherosclerotic changes in the coronary and carotid arteries. The assessment of the luminal narrowing is feasible, while the differentiation of stable and potentially unstable or vulnerable atherosclerotic plaques is currently not possible using non-invasive imaging. With high spatial resolution and high soft tissue contrast, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a suitable method for the evaluation of the thin arterial wall. In clinical practice, native MRI of the vessel wall already allows the differentiation and characterization of components of atherosclerotic plaques in the carotid arteries and the aorta. Additional diagnostic information can be gained by the use of non-specific MRI contrast agents. With the development of targeted molecular probes, that highlight specific molecules or cells, pathological processes can be visualized at a molecular level with high spatial resolution. In this review article, the development of pathophysiological changes leading to the development of the arterial wall are introduced and discussed. Additionally, principles of contrast enhanced imaging with non-specific contrast agents and molecular probes will be discussed and latest developments in the field of molecular imaging of the vascular wall will be introduced. KEY POINTS: Molecular magnetic resonance imaging has great potential to improve the in vivo characterization of atherosclerotic plaques. Based on the molecular information is feasible to enable a better differentiation of stable and unstable (vulnerable) atherosclerotic plaques.


Asunto(s)
Infarto Cerebral/diagnóstico , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/diagnóstico , Arteriosclerosis Intracraneal/diagnóstico , Angiografía por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Imagen Molecular/métodos , Infarto del Miocardio/diagnóstico , Medios de Contraste , Interpretación de Imagen Asistida por Computador/métodos , Sensibilidad y Especificidad
2.
Rofo ; 187(2): 92-101, 2015 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25585260

RESUMEN

Cardiovascular diseases remain the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in industrialized and developing countries. In clinical practice, the in-vivo identification of atherosclerotic lesions, which can lead to complications such as heart attack or stroke, remains difficult. Imaging techniques provide the reference standard for the detection of clinically significant atherosclerotic changes in the coronary and carotid arteries. The assessment of the luminal narrowing is feasible, while the differentiation of stable and potentially unstable or vulnerable atherosclerotic plaques is currently not possible using non-invasive imaging. With high spatial resolution and high soft tissue contrast, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a suitable method for the evaluation of the thin arterial wall. In clinical practice, native MRI of the vessel wall already allows the differentiation and characterization of components of atherosclerotic plaques in the carotid arteries and the aorta. Additional diagnostic information can be gained by the use of non-specific MRI contrast agents. With the development of targeted molecular probes, that highlight specific molecules or cells, pathological processes can be visualized at a molecular level with high spatial resolution. In this review article, the development of pathophysiological changes leading to the development of the arterial wall are introduced and discussed. Additionally, principles of contrast enhanced imaging with non-specific contrast agents and molecular probes will be discussed and latest developments in the field of molecular imaging of the vascular wall will be introduced.


Asunto(s)
Aterosclerosis/diagnóstico , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/diagnóstico , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Imagen Molecular/métodos , Animales , Aterosclerosis/fisiopatología , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/fisiopatología , Medios de Contraste , Modelos Animales de Enfermedad , Humanos , Interpretación de Imagen Asistida por Computador , Angiografía por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Sondas Moleculares , Neovascularización Patológica/diagnóstico , Neovascularización Patológica/fisiopatología , Túnica Íntima/fisiopatología
3.
Rofo ; 185(3): 219-27, 2013 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23196834

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To evaluate morphologic characteristics and establish a standardized diagnostic algorithm to differentiate benign cystic pancreatic tumors (CPTs) in non-pancreatitis patients using multidetector computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with histopathologically proven CPTs who had undergone MRI and/or CT and subsequent tumor resection in our institution were retrospectively identified. Images were analyzed for morphology and enhancement patterns by three independent blinded observers. Preoperative image findings were correlated with histopathological results. Based on the evaluated morphologic parameters, a standardized diagnostic algorithm was designed to help characterize the lesions. RESULTS: A total of 62 consecutive patients with 64 CPTs were identified from the surgical database (21 intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms; 10 mucinous cystic neoplasms; 12 serous microcystic adenomas; 3 serous oligocystic adenomas; 6 solid pseudopapillary tumors; 12 neuroendocrine neoplasms). The overall averaged accuracy for the 3 observers was 89.9 % for CT and 93.1 % for MRI with increasing overall accuracy in relation to the experience of the observer (88.2 %, 91.5 %, and 93.8 %, respectively). Overall, the generalized kappa value was 0.69 (CT, 0.64; MRI, 0.76); p < 0.001). The accuracy of the standardized diagnostic algorithm was 91.1 %. CONCLUSION: It is possible to characterize benign CPTs with MRI and CT, while MRI appears to be superior to CT. Diagnostic accuracy depends on the observer's experience. The standardized algorithm can aid in the differential diagnosis but still needs to be tested in other patient populations.


Asunto(s)
Interpretación de Imagen Asistida por Computador/métodos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Tomografía Computarizada Multidetector/métodos , Quiste Pancreático/patología , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/patología , Adulto , Anciano , Algoritmos , Medios de Contraste/administración & dosificación , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Femenino , Humanos , Aumento de la Imagen/métodos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/normas , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Tomografía Computarizada Multidetector/normas , Páncreas/patología , Sensibilidad y Especificidad
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA