RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the cost effectiveness of ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) in the Platelet Inhibition and Patient Outcomes (PLATO) study who were scheduled for non-invasive management. METHODS: A previously developed cost effectiveness model was used to estimate long-term costs and outcomes for patients scheduled for non-invasive management. Healthcare costs, event rates and health-related quality of life under treatment with either ticagrelor or clopidogrel over 12â months were estimated from the PLATO study. Long-term costs and health outcomes were estimated based on data from PLATO and published literature sources. To investigate the importance of different healthcare cost structures and life expectancy for the results, the analysis was carried out from the perspectives of the Swedish, UK, German and Brazilian public healthcare systems. RESULTS: Ticagrelor was associated with lifetime quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gains of 0.17 in Sweden, 0.16 in the UK, 0.17 in Germany and 0.13 in Brazil compared with generic clopidogrel, with increased healthcare costs of 467, 551, 739 and 574, respectively. The cost per QALY gained with ticagrelor was 2747, 3395, 4419 and 4471 from a Swedish, UK, German and Brazilian public healthcare system perspective, respectively. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses indicated that the cost per QALY gained with ticagrelor was below conventional threshold values of cost effectiveness with a high probability. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of patients with ACS scheduled for 12â months' non-invasive management with ticagrelor is associated with a cost per QALY gained below conventional threshold values of cost effectiveness compared with generic clopidogrel. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT000391872.
Asunto(s)
Síndrome Coronario Agudo/tratamiento farmacológico , Adenosina/análogos & derivados , Ticlopidina/análogos & derivados , Síndrome Coronario Agudo/diagnóstico , Síndrome Coronario Agudo/economía , Síndrome Coronario Agudo/psicología , Adenosina/economía , Adenosina/uso terapéutico , Brasil , Clopidogrel , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Manejo de la Enfermedad , Electrocardiografía , Femenino , Alemania , Costos de la Atención en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Cadenas de Markov , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/economía , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/uso terapéutico , Calidad de Vida , Años de Vida Ajustados por Calidad de Vida , Prevención Secundaria/economía , Prevención Secundaria/métodos , Suecia , Ticagrelor , Ticlopidina/economía , Ticlopidina/uso terapéutico , Reino UnidoRESUMEN
AIM:To assess clinical outcomes, efficacy, and safety according to sex during anticoagulation with apixaban compared with warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation.METHODS AND RESULTS:Apixaban for Reduction in Stroke and Other Thromboembolic Events in Atrial Fibrillation (ARISTOTLE) was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre trial that included 11 785 (64.7%) men and 6416 (35.3%) women with atrial fibrillation or flutter randomized to receive either warfarin or apixaban. The primary efficacy endpoint was stroke or systemic embolism; secondary efficacy endpoints were death from any cause and cardiovascular death. The primary safety endpoint was major bleeding; secondary safety endpoints were a composite of major bleeding and non-major clinically relevant bleeding. The risk of stroke or systemic embolism was similar in women vs. men [adjusted hazard ratio (adjHR): 0.91; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.74-1.12; P = 0.38]. However, among patients with history of stroke or transient ischaemic attack, women had a lower risk of recurrent stroke compared with men (adjHR: 0.70; 95% CI: 0.50-0.97; P = 0.036). Women also had a lower risk of all-cause death (adjHR: 0.63; 95% CI: 0.55-0.73; P < 0.0001) and cardiovascular death (adjHR: 0.62; 95% CI: 0.51-0.75; P < 0.0001), and a trend towards less major bleeding (adjHR: 0.86; 95% CI: 0.74-1.01; P = 0.066) and major or non-major clinically relevant bleeding (adjHR: 0.89; 95% CI: 0.80-1.00; P = 0.049). The efficacy and safety benefits of apixaban compared with warfarin were consistent regardless of sex.CONCLUSION:In the ARISTOTLE trial, women had a similar rate of stroke or systemic embolism but a lower risk of mortality and less clinically relevant bleeding than men. The efficacy and safety benefits of apixaban compared with warfarin were consistent in men and women...