RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Extended-spectrum ß-lactamase (ESBL)-producing bacteria are important sources of infection; however, Canadian data evaluating the impact of ESBL-associated infection are lacking. AIM: To determine whether patients infected with ESBL-producing Escherichia coli or Klebsiella species (ESBL-EcKs) exhibit differences in clinical outcome, microbiological outcome, mortality, and/or hospital resource use compared to patients infected with non-ESBL-producing strains. METHODS: A retrospective case-control study of 75 case patients with ESBL-EcKs matched to controls infected with non-ESBL-EcKs who were hospitalized from June 2010 to April 2013 was conducted. Patient-level cost data were provided by the institution's business office. Clinical data were collected using the electronic databases and paper charts. FINDINGS: Median infection-related hospitalization costs per patient were greater for cases than controls (C$10,507 vs C$7,882; median difference: C$3,416; P = 0.04). The primary driver of increased costs was prolonged infection-related hospital length of stay (8 vs 6 days; P = 0.02) with patient location (ward, ICU) and indirect care costs (including costs associated with infection prevention and control) as the leading cost categories. Cases were more likely to experience clinical failure (25% vs 11%; P = 0.03), with a higher all-cause mortality (17% vs 5%; P = 0.04). Less than half of case patients were prescribed appropriate empiric antimicrobial therapy, whereas controls received adequate initial treatment in nearly all circumstances (48% vs 96%; P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Patients with infection caused by ESBL-EcKs are at increased risk for clinical failure and mortality, with additional cost to the Canadian healthcare system of C$3,416 per patient.
Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Escherichia coli/microbiología , Escherichia coli/enzimología , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Hospitalización/economía , Infecciones por Klebsiella/microbiología , Klebsiella/enzimología , beta-Lactamasas/metabolismo , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Canadá , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Escherichia coli/aislamiento & purificación , Infecciones por Escherichia coli/economía , Infecciones por Escherichia coli/mortalidad , Infecciones por Escherichia coli/patología , Femenino , Humanos , Klebsiella/aislamiento & purificación , Infecciones por Klebsiella/economía , Infecciones por Klebsiella/mortalidad , Infecciones por Klebsiella/patología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Análisis de Supervivencia , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
To reduce selective pressure for antimicrobial resistance, empirical use of antipseudomonal antibiotics is often reserved for patients with late-onset hospital-acquired infections. We examined the likelihood of isolating Pseudomonas aeruginosa as a function of time from hospital admission. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of all positive bacterial cultures in a tertiary-care hospital between March 2010 and November 2011. The primary outcome was the proportion of positive cultures yielding P. aeruginosa. Multivariable logistic regression was employed to assess the impact of time from admission on the likelihood of isolating P. aeruginosa, after adjusting for other important risk factors. A total of 7,668 positive cultures were obtained from 4,108 unique patients during the study interval, including 633 (8.3%) yielding P. aeruginosa. The probability of isolating P. aeruginosa increased linearly from 79/2,044 (3.9%) positive cultures obtained on admission to 153/664 (23%) in the 10th week of admission or beyond. The unadjusted odds ratio was 1.002/day (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.0016 to 1.0028; P < 0.0001); the adjusted odds ratio (aOR) was 1.0007/day (95% CI, 1.0001 to 1.0013; P = 0.02). Other important predictors of P. aeruginosa isolation included respiratory specimen type (aOR, 13.8; 95% CI, 9.1 to 21.1), recent hospital admission (aOR,1.8; 95% CI, 1.4 to 2.3), prior P. aeruginosa isolation during current admission (aOR, 4.9; 95% CI, 3.7 to 6.4), and prior antipseudomonal (aOR, 1.9; 95% CI, 1.4 to 2.5) or nonantipseudomonal (aOR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.4 to 2.4) antibiotic exposure. It was determined that as time from admission increases, there is a linear increase in the likelihood of P. aeruginosa isolation. Any guidelines which distinguish early from late hospital-acquired infection must consider the implications of time point selection on the likelihood of inadequate P. aeruginosa empirical coverage.
Asunto(s)
Infección Hospitalaria/epidemiología , Infecciones por Pseudomonas/epidemiología , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/aislamiento & purificación , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Estudios de Cohortes , Infección Hospitalaria/tratamiento farmacológico , Infección Hospitalaria/microbiología , Humanos , Incidencia , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Infecciones por Pseudomonas/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por Pseudomonas/microbiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Centros de Atención Terciaria , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
Automatic stop-orders (ASOs) have been utilized to discourage inappropriately prolonged antibiotic therapy. An ASO policy, which required reordering of antibiotics after 7 days of therapy, had been in place at our institution prior to 2002, but was revoked after instances of compromised patient care due to inadvertent and inappropriate interruption of antimicrobial treatment. The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of revoking the ASO policy on the duration of antibiotic therapy, infection-related outcome (cure vs failure), relapsing infection, occurrence of resistant bacteria and superinfection in patients with nosocomial pneumonia. A retrospective chart review of adult patients (≥ 18 years old) admitted to Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre with nosocomial pneumonia requiring antibiotic therapy was conducted. Duration of antibiotic therapy, infection-related outcome (cure vs failure), rate of relapsing infection, resistant organisms and superinfection were determined for each cohort. Forty-six eligible adults with nosocomial pneumonia per cohort were included [corrected]. Duration of antibiotic therapy was not significantly different in the pre- (11.4 ± 3.8 days) compared with the post-ASO revocation cohort (10.8 ± 4.1 days; p=0.43). There were also no significant differences between the cohorts with regard to infection-related outcome (cure vs failure), relapsing infection, or the occurrence of resistant bacteria or superinfection (p>0.5). Revocation of the ASO policy for antibiotics at our institution was not associated with a longer duration of antibiotic therapy, or increased incidence of infection-related mortality, relapsing infection, resistant bacteria or superinfection for patients with nosocomial pneumonia.
Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Infección Hospitalaria/tratamiento farmacológico , Investigación sobre Servicios de Salud , Neumonía Bacteriana/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Bacterias/efectos de los fármacos , Bacterias/aislamiento & purificación , Infección Hospitalaria/epidemiología , Infección Hospitalaria/microbiología , Infección Hospitalaria/mortalidad , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neumonía Bacteriana/epidemiología , Neumonía Bacteriana/microbiología , Neumonía Bacteriana/mortalidad , Recurrencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Cefazolin plus tobramycin have been determined to be effective for community-acquired FN, but have not been evaluated in the treatment of nosocomial FN. This study compared the incidence of mortality from 2002 to 2004 with 2008 to 2009 in patients with nosocomial FN treated with cefazolin plus tobramycin and compared characteristics of patients with nosocomially acquired FN to community acquired FN. A retrospective chart review of 45 nosocomial FN episodes from 2008 to 2009, and 54 episodes from 2002 to 2004 treated with cefazolin plus tobramycin was conducted. Data on the community acquired FN episodes was obtained from our previous research. Nosocomial FN mortality increased from 4% in 2002-2004 to 13% in 2008-2009 (p = 0.08). The nosocomial cohort was at higher risk of medical complications and mortality than the community-acquired cohort based on several variables (neutrophil nadir, duration of neutropenia and fever, hematological malignancy, MASCC and Talcott score; p < 0.05). As a result, the nosocomial cohort was treated with longer courses of antibiotic therapy (14 days vs 7 days; p < 0.0001) and were more likely to require broader spectrum antibiotics (64 out of 99 vs 34 out of 96; p < 0.0001). There was an observed increased risk of mortality from 2002 to 2004 compared with 2008 to 2009 in patients treated with cefazolin plus tobramycin for nosocomial FN, this was notable despite not attaining statistical significance. Therefore, this regimen is not appropriate for nosocomial FN.