Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 10 de 10
Filtrar
1.
Gen Hosp Psychiatry ; 29(1): 8-13, 2007.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17189738

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: A number of medical practice guidelines and recommendations call for screening adult patients for a history of physical or sexual abuse in childhood, but no brief screening tools exist. The objective of this study was to assess the accuracy of a two-item screener for physical or sexual abuse in childhood. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional study of randomly selected women (aged 18-65 years) from a large health maintenance organization. One thousand two hundred twenty-five patients were administered a questionnaire, which included two items in a brief screener: (a) "When I was growing up, people in my family hit me so hard that it left me with bruises or marks" and (b) "When I was growing up, someone tried to touch me in a sexual way or tried to make me touch them." A subset of 216 patients completed a semistructured interview for a history of physical or sexual abuse in childhood. RESULTS: The two-item screener was sensitive (84.8%) and specific (88.1%) for detecting a history of physical or sexual abuse in childhood, as determined by the semistructured interview. CONCLUSIONS: The two-item screener provides an accurate tool, which is easily integrated into a comprehensive health questionnaire or administered verbally by a clinician, to assess for history of abuse.


Asunto(s)
Abuso Sexual Infantil/psicología , Abuso Sexual Infantil/estadística & datos numéricos , Tamizaje Masivo/métodos , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Niño , Maltrato a los Niños/psicología , Maltrato a los Niños/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prevalencia , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
2.
Arch Intern Med ; 166(18): 2020-6, 2006 Oct 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17030837

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: A number of practice guidelines and recommendations call for the assessment of childhood abuse in adult medical patients, but none specifies how best to do this. The objective of this study was to use evidence from 2 community-based population samples to evaluate abuse-screening questions that are often asked in medical clinics and to identify a small set of questions to improve screening practices. METHODS: The Childhood Trauma Questionnaire-Short Form (CTQ-SF) was administered in 2 randomized telephone interview surveys with adults aged 18 to 65 years. RESULTS: A total of 880 (2003 survey) and 998 (1997 survey) respondents completed the CTQ-SF in the 2 surveys. In both surveys, the rates of physical (16% and 15%), emotional (31% and 29%), and sexual (10% and 9%) abuse elicited using 3 behaviorally descriptive items in each abuse category were approximately twice the rates elicited using the explicit labeling terms physically abused (8% and 8%), emotionally abused (15% and 13%), or sexually abused (5% and 5%) (P<.001 for each). Inquiries explicitly using the labeling term abuse successfully identified a low percentage of respondents who reported behaviorally described abusive experiences for each type of abuse (34%-51%). In addition, after adjustment for the number and frequency of abusive experiences in both surveys, women were more likely than men to label themselves as explicitly abused for any abuse (odds ratio [OR], 1.7; P = .11 and OR, 2.8; P<.01), physical abuse (OR, 2.1; P = .14 and OR, 2.9; P<.01), emotional abuse (OR, 2.7; P<.01 and OR, 3.3; P<.01), and sexual abuse (OR, 3.5; P = .08 and OR, 1.5; P = .55). CONCLUSION: Inquiries about childhood abuse that use broad labeling questions identify a substantially smaller number of patients than behaviorally specific questions and may be less effective in initial screening for a history of abuse.


Asunto(s)
Maltrato a los Niños/diagnóstico , Tamizaje Masivo/métodos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Niño , Femenino , Humanos , Entrevistas como Asunto , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Factores Sexuales , Estados Unidos
3.
Gen Hosp Psychiatry ; 26(4): 261-8, 2004.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15234820

RESUMEN

Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is associated with high numbers of self-reported physical symptoms and functional disability in clinical samples, but little is known about the magnitude of these associations in population samples and using actual physician-coded diagnoses. We administered a 22-page survey to 1225 female HMO enrollees randomly selected from the current membership of a large, staff model HMO in Seattle, Washington. Using the PTSD Checklist (internally validated against a subset of clinical interviews) we compared women with low, moderate, and high scores with respect to differences in self-reported physical health status, functional disability (36-item short form health survey), numbers and types of self-reported health risk behaviors, common physical symptoms, and physician-coded ICD-9 diagnoses. Compared to women with low PTSD symptom severity, those with moderate or high severity reported significantly higher functional disability (P<.001), rates of abuse and neglect (P<.01 to P<.001), health risk behavior scores (P<0.05), as well as higher mean numbers of common physical symptoms (P<.05). Compared to women with low PTSD symptom severity those with moderate or high severity had significantly higher adjusted odds ratios for aversive physical symptoms (range, 1.7-10.1). The mean number of physician-coded ICD-9 diagnoses was also significantly higher in the both the moderate and high severity groups. Among female HMO members, PTSD symptoms are associated with a wide range of both self-reported and physician-coded adverse physical health outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Sistemas Prepagos de Salud , Estado de Salud , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/psicología , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Manual Diagnóstico y Estadístico de los Trastornos Mentales , Evaluación de la Discapacidad , Femenino , Conductas Relacionadas con la Salud , Humanos , Clasificación Internacional de Enfermedades , Persona de Mediana Edad , Asunción de Riesgos , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Trastornos Somatomorfos/diagnóstico , Trastornos Somatomorfos/psicología , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/diagnóstico , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
4.
Med Educ ; 38(3): 262-70, 2004 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14996335

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Converging sources suggest that patient-provider relationships in primary care are generally of greater intensity and duration than those in non-primary care specialties. In this study, we hypothesised that Year 2 medical students whose close relationships were characterised by security and flexibility would be more likely than students who were less comfortable in close relationships to plan to pursue primary over non-primary care postgraduate training. METHODS: We determined the relationship styles and demographic characteristics of 144 Year 2 medical students. We also gathered information regarding their predicted choices of postgraduate training, which were clustered into primary or non-primary care categories. We compared student choices with respect to their interpersonal relationship styles based on attachment theory. RESULTS: Prevalences of attachment styles were similar to those found in the general population, with 56% of students rating themselves as having a secure relationship style. Students with a secure style were more likely to choose primary care (61%) over non-primary care compared to those whose styles were characterised by self-reliance, support-seeking or caution (41% chose primary care). Compared to those with a secure relationship style, students with a cautious style [OR = 5.9 (1.9, 18.7)] and students with a self-reliant style [OR = 2.4 (0.96, 5.9)] were more likely to choose non-primary over primary care, after controlling for gender. CONCLUSIONS: Assessing relationship styles using attachment theory is a potentially useful way to understand and counsel medical students about specialty choice.


Asunto(s)
Selección de Profesión , Relaciones Interpersonales , Medicina , Atención Primaria de Salud , Especialización , Estudiantes de Medicina/psicología , Adulto , Conducta de Elección , Educación Médica , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Oportunidad Relativa , Factores Socioeconómicos
5.
Int J Psychiatry Med ; 34(3): 247-58, 2004.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15666959

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: This article uses data from two studies that have demonstrated the overall effectiveness of Collaborative Care interventions to evaluate factors associated with poor outcomes overall (general prognostic factors) and factors associated with greater or lesser effects of treatment (differential treatment effects). METHODS: Adult primary care patients initiating antidepressant treatment for major depression were randomized to usual care or to Collaborative Care, a structured depression treatment program that included planned, proactive and coordinated care with a health care team and informed, activated patients (n = 156, mean age = 43, 85% white). Response to treatment was defined as a 50% or greater reduction in depression at four months. RESULTS: High neuroticism and a history of recurrent major depression (3+ episodes) or dysthymia predicted poor outcomes in general. While the magnitude of the intervention effects differed, frequently cited predictors of persistence of depression (age, gender, depression severity, medical and psychiatric comorbidity) were not significantly associated with greater or lesser benefit from Collaborative Care (no differential treatment effects). Results demonstrate the robustness of intervention effects across numerous groups at risk for persistence of depression. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that at the time of diagnosis it is not possible to predict who is most likely to benefit from Collaborative Care. Instead, outcomes of treatment should be routinely monitored among depressed patients to ensure optimal response.


Asunto(s)
Antidepresivos/uso terapéutico , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/tratamiento farmacológico , Servicios de Salud Mental/organización & administración , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Enfermedad Crónica , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/diagnóstico , Manual Diagnóstico y Estadístico de los Trastornos Mentales , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Servicios de Salud Mental/provisión & distribución , Persona de Mediana Edad , Grupo de Atención al Paciente , Trastornos de la Personalidad/diagnóstico , Atención Primaria de Salud/métodos , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Resultado del Tratamiento
6.
Arch Gen Psychiatry ; 60(4): 369-74, 2003 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12695314

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is a prevalent disorder that has been associated with elevated rates of medically unexplained physical symptoms, significant functional impairment, and high health care use. However, little is known about actual health care costs associated with PTSD. METHODS: We administered the PTSD Checklist (PCL) to 1225 female members of a metropolitan health maintenance organization and validated the instrument using a structured PTSD interview in a subset of 268 women. Participants were classified into 3 groups by PCL score: low (<30), moderate (30-44), and high (> or =45). By using the cost accounting system of the health maintenance organization, we examined differences between the groups with respect to total and component health care costs, controlling for chronic medical illness and other forms of psychological distress. RESULTS: The total unadjusted mean +/- SD annual health care costs were 3060 US dollars +/- 6381 US dollars (median, 1283 US dollars) for the high PCL score group, 1779 US dollars +/- 3008 US dollars (median, 829 US dollars) for the moderate PCL score group, and 1646 US dollars +/- 5156 US dollars (median, 609 US dollars) for the low PCL score group. After adjusting for depression, chronic medical disease, and demographic factors, women with high PCL scores had a significantly greater odds of having nonzero health care costs compared with women with low PCL scores (odds ratio, 13.14; 95% confidence interval, 1.70-101.19). Compared with women in the low PCL score group, those in the moderate PCL score group had, on average, a 38% increase in adjusted total annual median costs, and those in the high PCL score group had a 104% increase. CONCLUSIONS: Women with PTSD symptoms in this study had significantly higher total and component health care costs, even after controlling for depression, chronic medical illness, and demographic differences. These findings are similar to those found in studies of costs related to major depression and suggest that instituting health services interventions to improve recognition and treatment of PTSD in primary and specialty care clinics may be a cost-effective approach for lowering the prevalence of this disorder.


Asunto(s)
Costos de la Atención en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/diagnóstico , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/economía , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Femenino , Sistemas Prepagos de Salud/economía , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Inventario de Personalidad , Escalas de Valoración Psiquiátrica , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Factores Sexuales , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Washingtón
7.
Gen Hosp Psychiatry ; 24(6): 375-80, 2002.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12490338

RESUMEN

Although Post-traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) is common among patients seeking care at medical clinics, little is known about the performance of screening instruments for this disorder in these settings. Previous studies of acute trauma populations using the PTSD Checklist (PCL) have suggested that scores of 45-50 provide the best discrimination between cases and noncases. We gave the PCL to 1,225 randomly selected women enrolled in an HMO. After interviewing a sample of 261 of these women using a structured, clinician-administered PTSD interview, we compared the results of the PCL to the clinician interviews over a range of possible cut scores using Receiver Operating Characteristic analysis. The optimum balance of sensitivity and specificity for this population was a score of 30, yielding a sensitivity of.82 and specificity of.76. The positive and negative likelihood ratios for this cut score were 3.40 and 0.24, respectively. By comparison, the use of 45 as a cut score would result in very low sensitivity (.36) in this setting. The lower cut score found in this study may indicate that the use of previously published cut scores of 45-50 may not optimize the function of the PCL as a screening tool outside of acute trauma settings due to an unacceptably high number of false negative cases.


Asunto(s)
Sistemas Prepagos de Salud , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/diagnóstico , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Psicometría , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/epidemiología
8.
Psychosom Med ; 64(4): 660-7, 2002.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12140356

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Attachment theory proposes that cognitive schemas based on earlier repeated experiences with caregivers influence how individuals perceive and act within interpersonal relationships. We hypothesized that medical patients with two types of insecure attachment-preoccupied and fearful attachment-would have higher physical symptom reporting compared with those with other attachment styles, but that preoccupied attachment would be associated with higher and fearful attachment with lower primary care utilization and costs. METHODS: In a large sample of adult female primary care health maintenance organization patients (N = 701), we used analysis of covariance and Poisson regressions to determine whether attachment style was significantly associated with 1) symptom reporting based on questions from the somatization section of the Diagnostic Interview Schedule and 2) contemporaneous automated utilization and cost data. RESULTS: Attachment style was significantly associated with symptom reporting (p =.02), with patients with preoccupied (p =.03) and fearful (p =.003) attachment having a significantly greater number of physical symptoms compared with secure patients. There were no significant differences in medical comorbidity between attachment groups. Attachment was also significantly associated with primary care visits and costs. Patients with preoccupied attachment had the highest primary care costs and utilization, whereas patients with fearful attachment had the lowest. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that attachment style is an important factor in assessing symptom perception and health care utilization. Despite being on opposite ends of the utilization spectrum, patients with preoccupied and fearful attachment have the highest symptom reporting. These data challenge the observation that increased symptom reporting is uniformly associated with increased utilization in medical patients.


Asunto(s)
Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Apego a Objetos , Teoría Psicológica , Trastornos Psicofisiológicos/diagnóstico , Adulto , Afecto , Femenino , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Servicios de Salud/economía , Estado de Salud , Humanos , Relaciones Interpersonales , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Relaciones Médico-Paciente , Atención Primaria de Salud/economía , Trastornos Psicofisiológicos/epidemiología , Trastornos Psicofisiológicos/terapia , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
10.
Ann Pharmacother ; 36(4): 585-91, 2002 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11918503

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To develop a pharmacist intervention to improve depression care and outcomes within a primary care setting. METHODS: Pragmatic, randomized trial of a clinical pharmacist collaborative care intervention versus usual care in a busy, academic family practice clinic. RESULTS: Seventy-four patients diagnosed with a new episode of major depression and started on antidepressant medications were randomized to enhanced care (EC) or usual care (UC) groups. EC consists of a clinical pharmacist collaborating with primary care providers (PCPs) to facilitate education, initiation, and titration of acute-phase antidepressant treatment to monitor treatment adherence and to prevent relapse. Control patients receive UC by their PCP. The main end point is reduction of depression symptoms over time as measured by the Hopkins Symptom Checklist (SCL-20). Other outcomes include the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, (DSM-IV) criteria for major depression, health-related quality of life measured by the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 12 (SF-12), medication adherence, patient satisfaction, and healthcare utilization. The main end point and the cost of treating major depression will be used to estimate the cost-effectiveness of the collaborative care model. CONCLUSIONS: The study is a unique, ongoing trial that may have important implications for the treatment of depression in primary care settings as well as new roles for clinical pharmacists.


Asunto(s)
Depresión/terapia , Farmacéuticos/estadística & datos numéricos , Atención Primaria de Salud/organización & administración , Adulto , Antidepresivos/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Humanos , Modelos Organizacionales , Atención Primaria de Salud/economía , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA