Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
Implement Sci ; 12(1): 89, 2017 07 18.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28720114

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Quality improvement is a recommended strategy to improve implementation levels for evidence-based essential interventions, but experience of and evidence for its effects in low-resource settings are limited. We hypothesised that a systemic and collaborative quality improvement approach covering district, facility and community levels, supported by report cards generated through continuous household and health facility surveys, could improve the implementation levels and have a measurable population-level impact on coverage and quality of essential services. METHODS: Collaborative quality improvement teams tested self-identified strategies (change ideas) to support the implementation of essential maternal and newborn interventions recommended by the World Health Organization. In Tanzania and Uganda, we used a plausibility design to compare the changes over time in one intervention district with those in a comparison district in each country. Evaluation included indicators of process, coverage and implementation practice analysed with a difference-of-differences and a time-series approach, using data from independent continuous household and health facility surveys from 2011 to 2014. Primary outcomes for both countries were birth in health facilities, breastfeeding within 1 h after birth, oxytocin administration after birth and knowledge of danger signs for mothers and babies. Interpretation of the results considered contextual factors. RESULTS: The intervention was associated with improvements on one of four primary outcomes. We observed a 26-percentage-point increase (95% CI 25-28%) in the proportion of live births where mothers received uterotonics within 1 min after birth in the intervention compared to the comparison district in Tanzania and an 8-percentage-point increase (95% CI 6-9%) in Uganda. The other primary indicators showed no evidence of improvement. In Tanzania, we saw positive changes for two other outcomes reflecting locally identified improvement topics. The intervention was associated with an increase in preparation of clean birth kits for home deliveries (31 percentage points, 95% CI 2-60%) and an increase in health facility supervision by district staff (14 percentage points, 95% CI 0-28%). CONCLUSIONS: The systemic quality improvement approach was associated with improvements of only one of four primary outcomes, as well as two Tanzania-specific secondary outcomes. Reasons for the lack of effects included limited implementation strength as well a relatively short follow-up period in combination with a 1-year recall period for population-based estimates and a limited power of the study to detect changes smaller than 10 percentage points. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Pan African Clinical Trials Registry: PACTR201311000681314.


Asunto(s)
Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Servicios de Salud Materno-Infantil/organización & administración , Vigilancia en Salud Pública/métodos , Mejoramiento de la Calidad/organización & administración , Lactancia Materna , Conducta Cooperativa , Parto Domiciliario/normas , Humanos , Nacimiento Vivo/epidemiología , Servicios de Salud Materno-Infantil/normas , Oxitocina/administración & dosificación , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud , Indicadores de Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Tanzanía , Uganda
2.
J Perinatol ; 33(6): 476-81, 2013 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23348868

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To explore community understanding of perinatal illness in northern Ghana. STUDY DESIGN: A cross-sectional descriptive study design. RESULT: 253 community members participated in in-depth interviews and focus group discussions, including women with newborn infants, grandmothers and health care providers. Four overarching themes emerged: (1) Local understanding of illness affects treatment practices. Respondents recognized danger signs of illness spanning antenatal to early neonatal periods. Understanding of causation often had a distinctly local flavor, and thus treatment sometimes differed from mainstream recommendations; (2) Mothers are frequently blamed for their infant's illness; (3) Healthcare decisions regarding infant care are often influenced by community members aside from the infant's mother and (4) Confidence in healthcare providers is issue-specific, and many households use a blended approach to meet their health needs. CONCLUSION: Despite widespread recognition of danger signs and reported intentions to treat ill infants through the formal health care system, traditional approaches to perinatal illness remain common. Interventions need to be aligned with community perceptions if they are to succeed.


Asunto(s)
Países en Desarrollo , Enfermedades del Recién Nacido/mortalidad , Mortalidad Perinatal , Población Rural , Causalidad , Estudios Transversales , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia , Femenino , Grupos Focales , Ghana , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Humanos , Cuidado del Lactante , Recién Nacido , Enfermedades del Recién Nacido/psicología , Medicina Tradicional , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud , Embarazo , Factores de Riesgo
3.
Child Care Health Dev ; 39(1): 20-6, 2013 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22680250

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Low birthweight and prematurity are risk factors for neonatal mortality. Identifying low birthweight and premature babies at birth and giving them appropriate care could increase their chances of survival. This study aimed at assessing the use of foot length as a surrogate for low birthweight and prematurity, and recommending an operational cut-off for identifying high-risk babies at the community level in low resource settings. METHODS: A hospital-based cross-sectional study was carried out between 1 September and 17 December 2009 in Uganda. Foot length of 711 newborns was measured using three different methods and their weight taken using a digital salter scale within 24 h of life. Gestational age of the newborns was also estimated using the Eregie method. Non-parametric receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was carried out to determine the foot length method with the highest predictive value to predict low birthweight and premature newborns. Sensitivity, specificity and predictive values for a range of foot lengths were estimated to determine the optimal cut-off to predict low birthweight and prematurity in this setting. RESULTS: Of the 711 babies recruited on day 1, 85 (12%) babies were low birthweight (<2500 g) and 29 (4%) premature (<37 weeks). The operational cut-off for foot length to detect small babies was defined as 7.6 cm, with sensitivity 85% [95% confidence interval (CI) 75-92] and specificity 81% (95% CI 78-84) for low birthweight, and sensitivity 96% (95% CI 82-100) and specificity 76% (95% CI 73-79) for premature babies. CONCLUSION: Foot length in the first days of life can predict low birthweight and prematurity among newborn babies in this setting. Further evaluation is needed to assess the feasibility of its use by community health workers to identify babies that need extra care.


Asunto(s)
Pie/anatomía & histología , Recién Nacido de Bajo Peso , Recien Nacido Prematuro , Tamizaje Neonatal/métodos , Antropometría/métodos , Peso al Nacer , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Uganda
4.
Afr Health Sci ; 12(4): 435-42, 2012 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23515457

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The perinatal mortality of 70 deaths per 1,000 total births in Uganda is unacceptably high. Perinatal death audits are important for improvement of perinatal care and reduction of perinatal morality. We integrated perinatal death audits in routine care, and describe its effect on perinatal mortality rate at Nsambya Hospital. METHODS: This was a retrospective descriptive study conducted from March - November 2008. An interdisciplinary hospital team conducted weekly perinatal death reviews. Each case was summarized and discussed, identifying gaps and cause of death. Local solutions were implemented according to the gaps identified from the audit process. RESULTS: Of the 350 perinatal deaths which occurred, 120 perinatal deaths were audited. 34.2% were macerated still births, 31.7% fresh still births and 34.2% early neonatal deaths. Avoidable factors included: poor neonatal resuscitation skills, incorrect use of the partographs and delay in performing caesarean sections. Activities implemented included: three skills sessions of neonatal resuscitation, introduction of Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) for babies with respiratory distress, updates on use of partographs. Perinatal mortality rate was 47.9 deaths per 1000 total births in 2008 after introduction of the audits compared to 52.8 per 1,000 total births in 2007. CONCLUSION: Conducting routine perinatal audits is feasible and contributes to reduction of facility perinatal mortality rate.


Asunto(s)
Hospitales Filantrópicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Complicaciones del Trabajo de Parto/epidemiología , Mortalidad Perinatal , Mortinato/epidemiología , Adulto , Femenino , Edad Gestacional , Humanos , Edad Materna , Servicios de Salud Materna/organización & administración , Auditoría Médica , Atención Perinatal/organización & administración , Embarazo , Atención Prenatal , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Estudios Retrospectivos , Uganda/epidemiología , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA