Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
2.
Anesth Analg ; 92(4): 1052-7, 2001 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11273950

RESUMEN

UNLABELLED: We compared the ketoprofen-propacetamol combination relative to propacetamol alone in thyroid and parathyroid surgery in terms of postoperative analgesic efficacy, bleeding, and incidence of nausea and vomiting to determine whether ketoprofen results in any benefit in this type of surgery. Patients were distributed in two parallel groups to be managed by anesthesiologists habitually prescribing (Ketoprofen group) or not prescribing (Control group) ketoprofen in this situation. The same anesthetic technique was used for all patients. Postoperative analgesia consisted of 2 g of propacetamol every 6 h and morphine boluses if the pain score measured by the numerical rating scale pain exceeded 40 (3 mg IV every 10 min in the recovery room, then 5 mg SC every 4 h in the ward). The Ketoprofen group received 100 mg of ketoprofen IV during surgery (starting on resection of specimen) and 8 h later. In the recovery room, patients received oxygen if the SpO(2) while they were breathing room air was < 95% on admission and at 1 and 2 h. Pain scores, opioid consumption, the volume of the cervical draining fluid, and the concentration and mass of hemoglobin in this fluid collected over 24 h were recorded. The 214 patients were distributed into two groups (n = 107 in each group) that were comparable in terms of age, weight, sex, duration of surgery, type of endocrinopathy, surgeon involvement, and the intraoperative dose of sufentanil (P > 0.2). The Ketoprofen group had lower numerical rating scale (P < 0.05), received less morphine during the first 24 h after surgery (7.4 +/- 5 vs 11.7 +/- 6 mg, P < 0.05), had fewer nausea and vomiting episodes (21 vs 38, P < 0.05), and were less likely to require oxygen breathing after 1 h in the recovery room (33 vs 59 patients, P < 0.05). The two groups had the same 24-h volume of cervical draining fluid (72.5 +/- 43 vs 70 +/- 42 mL, P > 0.2) and the same concentration (5.9 +/- 3.4 vs 6.4 +/- 2.8 g per 100 mL, P > 0.1) and mass of hemoglobin (3.9 +/- 2.8 vs 4.2 +/- 2.5 g, P > 0.2) in this collected fluid. Two cervical hematomas necessitating reintervention occurred in the Control group, compared with none in the Ketoprofen group. Ketoprofen reduces the pain score after thyroid and parathyroid surgery, as well as morphine requirements and related adverse effects, without increasing the risk of cervical bleeding. IMPLICATIONS: In a prospective open study, ketoprofen reduced the pain score after thyroid and parathyroid surgery, as well as morphine requirements and related adverse effects, without increasing the risk of cervical bleeding.


Asunto(s)
Acetaminofén/análogos & derivados , Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/uso terapéutico , Cetoprofeno/uso terapéutico , Glándulas Paratiroides/cirugía , Glándula Tiroides/cirugía , Acetaminofén/uso terapéutico , Anciano , Analgésicos no Narcóticos/uso terapéutico , Analgésicos Opioides/efectos adversos , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapéutico , Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/administración & dosificación , Combinación de Medicamentos , Femenino , Humanos , Hiperparatiroidismo/tratamiento farmacológico , Cetoprofeno/administración & dosificación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Morfina/efectos adversos , Morfina/uso terapéutico , Dimensión del Dolor/efectos de los fármacos , Dolor Postoperatorio/tratamiento farmacológico , Dolor Postoperatorio/prevención & control , Hemorragia Posoperatoria/prevención & control , Estudios Prospectivos
4.
Intensive Care Med ; 17(1): 30-5, 1991.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-2037722

RESUMEN

Paired quantitative blood cultures collected simultaneously via catheter and peripheral vein in Isolator 1.5 ml tubes, were performed in 50 febrile hematology children. Samples were taken to diagnose catheter-related sepsis (CRS) without catheter removal and to monitor the therapeutic efficiency of antimicrobials administered through the infected device by infusion and/or by the antibiotic lock technique (ALT). In 7 children (14%) the colony counts from catheter blood samples were 30-fold higher than the colony counts from peripheral samples, suggesting CRS; in 7 other patients (14%), identical colony counts in both samples suggested sepsis was not catheter-related. One patient (2%) had septicemia caused by E. coli found in the urinary tract; only the peripheral blood cultures were positive. In 6 patients (12%), the Isolator system was not effective for diagnosing bacteremia or CRS; in 29 patients (58%) the febrile episode was not microbiologically documented. All episodes of CRS were cured whatever the treatment was: infusion or ALT.


Asunto(s)
Sangre/microbiología , Cateterismo Venoso Central/efectos adversos , Protocolos Clínicos/normas , Fluidoterapia/efectos adversos , Enfermedades Hematológicas/terapia , Neoplasias/terapia , Sepsis/microbiología , Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Recolección de Muestras de Sangre/métodos , Recolección de Muestras de Sangre/normas , Catéteres de Permanencia/estadística & datos numéricos , Niño , Preescolar , Recuento de Colonia Microbiana , Humanos , Infusiones Intravenosas , Sepsis/sangre , Sepsis/tratamiento farmacológico
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA