RESUMEN
Background The smear layer has an adverse effect on the sealing of root canals during obturation, and it is the main reason for the failure of root canal treatment. Root canal irrigation using a conventional irrigation system is ineffective for smear layer removal, especially from the apical third region, where most lateral canals are present. For successful endodontic treatment, the smear layer should be removed from the apical third region using an effective irrigation activation system. Aim This study aimed to compare smear layer removal by conventional irrigation, XP Endo Finisher (XPF), endoactivator (EA), passive ultrasonic activation, and root canal brush using 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) as a chelating solution and 5.25% sodium hypochlorite after chemomechanical preparation, using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Method A total of 50 extracted human mandibular single canal premolars with mature roots were selected for this study. Samples were decoronated to obtain a standard working length (WL) of 15 mm. Canal patency was achieved using a 10 k file. Samples were sealed with sticky wax to obtain the vapor lock effect. Biomechanical preparation is done till F3. The samples were divided into five groups according to the final irrigation activation protocol: Group 1, control group; group 2, XPF; group 3, EA; group 4, passive ultrasonic irrigation (PUI); and group 5,, root canal brush. Samples were divided into two equal halves longitudinally. Each sample was analyzed for a smear layer under SEM at 2000x magnification. Statistical analysis was done using the one-way Anova "F" test and Tukey's post-hoc test. Results Group 3 showed the least presence of a smear layer, followed by groups 4, 2, 5, and 1. All the groups exhibited highly significant differences between each other (p < 0.001). Group B shows no significant difference with groups C, D, and E. Group C shows no significant difference with groups D and E. Group D shows no significant difference with group E. Conclusion The EA removes the smear layer effectively as compared with other groups. All the irrigation activation system shows the presence of smear layer. No activation systems were able to remove the smear layer completely.
RESUMEN
Lack of identification of the root canal results in root canal treatment failure, one of the most frequent causes of root canal treatment failure. To successfully treat root canals, it is crucial to have a detailed understanding of root canal configuration, including distinguishing traits and anatomical differences. The root canal in the C form arrangement is among the most important anatomical variances. Because of its distinctive highlight, the existence of fins or webs linking the different root canals - the C-shaped form of root canal has proven challenging to detect and manage. Any molar region may have this root canal arrangement, including the mandibular first molar, first premolar, and maxillary molars. Above all, mandibular second molars are where it is most usually discovered. This report discusses the uncommon maxillary first molar with an apically merged root. The importance of comprehending canal variations, which are C-shaped root canals, should be critically evaluated in light of the rise in the root canal treatment failure rate for the upper molars.
RESUMEN
Background: The ultimate goal of endodontic therapy is to eliminate all microorganisms present inside root canal and thereby sealing all the possible communicating pathways between pulpal and periradicular tissues, which prevents all the factors that cause recontamination and reinfection of the root canal system. If endodontic treatment fails, next approach is surgical endodontics. Bioceramics are recently introduced materials specifically designed for their potential use in medical field and dentistry. Aim: To evaluate and compare the push-out bond strength of mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) by adding titanium dioxide (TiO2), silver, and silicon dioxide nanoparticles. Materials and Methods: Totally, 60 single-rooted human teeth were used. Middle third of the root was sectioned to obtain 2-mm thick root section. Acrylic was adapted to the section to obtain disks of 5 mm diameter and 2 mm thickness. Canal was prepared by GG Drill. Samples were divided into four groups of 15 each (n = 15): ⢠Group I (control): MTA ⢠Group II: MTA + TiO2 nanoparticles. ⢠Group III: MTA + silver nanoparticles. ⢠Group IV: MTA + silicon dioxide nanoparticles. The cement mixture was compacted into the canal. Samples were subjected to push-out bond strength using universal testing machine. Statistical Analysis Used: The data were analyzed statistically by analysis of variance and post hoc comparison by Tukey's t-test. Results: The highest push-out bond strength was shown by Group II (MTA with TiO2 nanoparticles), followed by Group III (MTA with silver nanoparticles) and Group I (MTA control group). The lowest push-out bond strength was shown by Group III (MTA with silicon dioxide nanoparticles). Conclusions: TiO2 and silver nanoparticles when added into MTA lead to an increase in push-out bond strength of MTA.