RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to summarize the results of the endocrown (EC) studies that compared tooth preparation designs, tooth types, and ceramic material types in relation to fracture force values. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A full literature search was conducted in Web of Science, PubMed/Medline, EMBASE, Scopus, Cochrane Library, Google Scholar, and ProQuest electronic databases. The following keywords: Endocrown [(molar(s)) or (premolar(s) or (posterior teeth)] and Ceramic materials as (Lithium disilicate glass-ceramic; Zirconia; Lava Ultimate) and (fracture strength) or (fatigue) were used. Articles were manually searched utilizing their reference lists. Study selection was not restricted or limited to the time of publication, type of tested tooth, ceramic material, and EC design. RESULTS: A total of 34 laboratory studies published between 2008 and 2023 were included in this systemic review. Twelve studies were published in the last 3 years, the mandibular molar was examined by 14 studies, and premolars in both arches were investigated, followed by premolars in both arches. Lithium disilicate glass-ceramic (LDGC) was the most used material for EC testing, followed by LAVA Ultimate and zirconia materials. The EC design with a 2 mm extension inside the pulp (14 studies) was the most used. Fracture forces of maxillary molars or premolars were nearly equal and lower than those of mandibular molars. Differences among the fracture forces of the tested ceramic materials were marginal. EC with 2 mm deep inside the pulp showed the highest fracture force. CONCLUSIONS: Mandibular EC molars showed the highest fracture forces, followed by maxillary premolars and molars. No differences among the EC materials in the 2- and 4-mm pulpal extension designs were found, which had higher fracture forces than other designs.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Dental caries is one of the most common preventable diseases occurring among children. The aim here is to survey the oral hygiene practices that are commonly followed by Arab children and to see its relationship with their dental caries status. A cross-sectional study with multistage random sampling technique was conducted. Sociodemographic data and information on oral hygiene practices like use of toothbrush, dental floss, siwak, frequency of brushing along with number of snack between meals per day, and consumption of sugar per day was obtained. Presence of plaque on tooth surfaces was reported using plaque index, which was followed by DMFT index to determine the dental caries status. Among the sample of 500 school children, the mean plaque score in male (mean = 0.69; SD = 0.50) was slightly higher than the female (mean = 0.66; SD = 0.46). Increased frequency of snacks (P=0.05; ß=0.08; CI = -0.00, 0.09) and sugar consumption (P=0.01; ß=0.16; CI = 0.04, 0.27) per day significantly showed higher values of DMFT. Also, the odds of dental caries among the school children who were irregular in brushing their teeth was higher in contrast to the children brushing once (P=0.03; OR = 0.89; CI = 0.70, 1.12) or twice (P=0.03; OR = 0.80; CI = 0.64, 0.93) per day. It is recommended that the dental public health practitioners here should consider the effect of oral hygiene practices on oral health status in order to design the future health promotion interventions.