RESUMEN

This randomized, controlled trial evaluated the impact of personalized follow-up on compliance rates in high-risk patients receiving combination lipid-lowering therapy over 2 years. A random sample of 30 patients 7-30 days after cardiac surgery had baseline fasting low-density lipoprotein levels higher than 130 mg/dl. All patients received lovastatin 20 mg/day and colestipol 5 g twice/day. Weekly telephone contact was made with each patient for 12 weeks. Short- and long-term compliance was assessed by pill and packet counts and refill records. Compliance and lipid profile results were significantly better in the intervention group (p<0.05) up to 2 years after the start of therapy than in the control group for all parameters except high-density lipoprotein. However, this effect was not apparent during the first 12 weeks of therapy. Short-term telephone follow-up favorably affected compliance and lipid profile results up to 2 years after start of therapy.

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

The development of specific receptor antagonists, especially dopamine and serotonin, has broadened and strengthened the options available for the treatment of nausea and vomiting. In addition to the availability of these specific receptor antagonists, the use of combination regimens has become a major improvement in the ability to reduce side effects of many treatment protocols.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

The objective of this study was to compare the cost of intravenous adenosine and intravenous dipyridamole in positron emission tomography (PET) in patients with coronary artery disease. A retrospective, open-label, case-control, cost-effectiveness analysis was performed in the out-patient nuclear medicine department of a university hospital. Thirty-six patients underwent dipyridamole PET, and 72 matched patients underwent adenosine PET. A cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted using a direct cost accounting approach to estimate institutional costs. Key costs evaluated included acquisition cost, administration cost, monitoring cost, cost of management of side effects, and cost of follow-up care. The total cost of adenosine PET and dipyridamole PET was divided by their respective predictive accuracies to provide a total cost adjusted for efficacy. Adenosine increased heart rate and lowered systolic blood pressure to a significantly greater extent than dipyridamole. The number of patients experiencing adverse drug reactions was significantly greater for adenosine (82%) than for dipyridamole (67%), but the frequency of prolonged (> 5 minutes) and late-onset side effects was significantly greater for dipyridamole than for adenosine. The frequency of side effects requiring medical intervention was also significantly greater for dipyridamole (53%) than for adenosine (6%). Although adenosine had a significantly greater acquisition cost than dipyridamole, costs of monitoring, management of side effects, and follow-up care were significantly less for adenosine than for dipyridamole. As a result, the total cost of using dipyridamole is significantly greater ($928.00 per patient) than the total cost of using adenosine ($672.00 per patient). Based on these results, adenosine may be the drug of choice for pharmacologic vasodilation for PET.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Histamine2 (H2)-receptor antagonists are widely prescribed for a variety of acid-mediated gastrointestinal disorders. The objective of the present study was to quantify the frequency of inappropriate H2-receptor antagonist use and its economic impact in patients who were admitted to a critical care bed at our hospital and followed as outpatients for 1 year. Eighty-eight (72%) of 123 patients admitted to the coronary care unit (CCU) or the intensive care unit over a 14-day period received H2-receptor antagonists. Forty-five (51%) of the 88 patients did not have a documented indication for H2-receptor antagonist therapy. Most of the patients without indications were admitted to the CCU for cardiac diagnoses. Thirty-eight patients (43%) were discharged on oral H2-receptor antagonist therapy. Twenty (53%) of the 38 patients had no documented indication for therapy; 17 of these patients continued H2-receptor antagonist therapy for 1 year, whereas the remaining 3 patients received therapy for 1, 2, and 3 months, respectively. The cost of therapy for the 45 patients receiving inappropriate therapy during hospitalization was $5,084.31. Outpatients costs for the 20 patients remaining on inappropriate therapy was $8,619.75. The total cost of inappropriate therapy was $13,704.06. If data collected during this 2-week period were extrapolated to 1 year, the projected annual cost of inappropriate therapy would be $356,305.56. The economic impact of inappropriate H2-receptor antagonist therapy at our institution is great. Programs designed to reduce such inappropriate use must be implemented and evaluated for their ability to decrease the associated costs.

Asunto(s)