RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: A US survey of surgeons found that 32% store firearms unlocked and loaded. This study explored conditions and contexts impacting personal firearm storage methods among surgeons. METHODS: We conducted semi-structured interviews with English-speaking fellows of the American College of Surgeons who treated patients injured by firearms and who owned or lived in homes with firearms. Participants were recruited through email and subsequent snowball sampling from April 2022 to August 2022. All interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Thematic analysis was applied to transcripts to identify codes. A mixed deductive and inductive approach was used for data reduction and sorting. RESULTS: A total of 32 surgeons were interviewed; most were male and white. Dominant themes for firearm storage practices were based on (1) attitudes; (2) perceived norms; (3) personal agency; and (4) intention of firearm use. Personal agency often conflicted with attitudes and perceived norms for surgeons owning firearms for self-defence. CONCLUSIONS: Storage practices in this sample of firearm-owning surgeons were driven by intent for firearm use, coupled with attitudes, perceived norms and personal agency. Personal agency often conflicted with attitudes and perceived norms, especially for surgeons who owned their firearm for self-defence.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: We conducted a qualitative study to describe surgeon and surgical trainee perspectives of quality improvement (QI) in training and practice to elucidate how surgeons and trainees interact with barriers and leverage facilitators to learn and conduct QI. STUDY DESIGN: Surgeons and surgical trainees of the American College of Surgeons were recruited via email and snowball sampling to participate in focus groups. Eligible individuals were English speaking surgical trainees or practicing surgeons. We developed a semi-structured focus group protocol to explore barriers and facilitators of quality training and improvement. An inductive thematic approach was used to identify actionable items. RESULTS: Thirty-two surgical trainees and surgeons participated in six focus groups. 28% of participants were trainees (8 residents, 1 fellow) and 72% were practicing surgeons, representing practice settings in university, community, and Veterans Affairs hospitals in urban and suburban regions. Thematic analysis revealed the central theme among trainees was that they lacked necessary support to effectively learn and conduct QI. Dominant sub-themes included lack of formal education, insufficient time, inconsistent mentorship, and maximizing self-sufficiency to promotes success. The central theme among surgeons was that effective QI initiatives require adequate resources and institutional support; however, surgeons in this study were ultimately constrained by institutional limitations. Sub-themes included difficulties in data acquisition and interpretation, financial limitations, workforce and staffing challenges, misaligned stakeholder priorities, and institutional culture. CONCLUSION: This qualitative evaluation further details gaps in QI demonstrated by previous quantitative studies. There is an opportunity to address these gaps with dedicated QI training and mentorship for surgical trainees and by creating a supportive environment with ample resources for surgeons.