RESUMEN
Class A and B carbapenemases in Enterobacteriaceae may be detected using carbapenemase inhibition tests with boronic acid derivatives (BA) and dipicolinic acid (DPA)/EDTA, respectively. However, for OXA-48 (like) carbapenemases, no specific inhibitor is available. Because OXA-48 confers high-level temocillin resistance, a disc diffusion assay using temocillin as well as BA and DPA inhibition tests was evaluated for detection of class A, B and OXA-48 carbapenemases. The test collection included 128 well-characterized non-repeat Enterobacteriaceae isolates suspected of carbapenemase production; that is, with meropenem MICs ≥ 0.5 mg/L, including 99 carbapenemase producers (36 KPC, one GES, 31 MBL, four KPC plus VIM, 25 OXA-48, two OXA-162), and 29 ESBL and/or AmpC-producing isolates. PCR and sequencing of beta-lactamase genes was used as a reference test. Phenotypic carbapenemase detection was performed with discs (Rosco) containing meropenem (10 µg), temocillin (30 µg), meropenem + phenyl boronic acid (PBA), meropenem + DPA, meropenem + BA + DPA, and meropenem + cloxacillin (CL). Absence of synergy between meropenem and BA and/or DPA and a temocillin zone ≤10 mm was used to identify OXA-48. The sensitivity for identification of class A, B and OXA-48 carbapenemases was 95%, 90% and 100%, with 96-100% specificity. In non-Proteus species, the sensitivity for class B carbapenemase detection was 97%. All isolates without PBA or DPA synergy and a temocillin disc zone ≤10 mm were OXA-48 (like) positive. In conclusion, carbapenemase inhibition tests with PBA and DPA combined with a temocillin disc provide a reliable phenotypic confirmation method for class A, B and OXA-48 carbapenemases in Enterobacteriaceae.
Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/metabolismo , Proteínas Bacterianas/análisis , Técnicas Bacteriológicas/métodos , Enterobacteriaceae/enzimología , Inhibidores Enzimáticos/metabolismo , Penicilinas/metabolismo , beta-Lactamasas/análisis , Ácidos Borónicos/metabolismo , Humanos , Ácidos Picolínicos/metabolismo , Sensibilidad y EspecificidadRESUMEN
The adequate detection of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (CPE) is essential for adequate antibiotic therapy and for infection control purposes, especially in an outbreak setting. Selective agars play an important role in the detection of CPE. The Oxoid Brilliance™ CRE Agar (Thermo Fisher Scientific) was evaluated for the detection of CPE using 255 non-repetitive Enterobacteriaceae isolates, including 95 CPE (36 KPC, 4 KPC plus VIM, 4 NDM, 6 GIM, 20 VIM, and 25 OXA-48-producing isolates). The sensitivity of the CRE agar for the detection of CPE was 94 % (89/95), but differed per carbapenemase gene (100 % for KPC, NDM, and GIM, 90 % for VIM, and 84 % for OXA-48-producing isolates). The specificity of the CRE agar was 71 %, due to the growth of AmpC- and/or ESBL-producing isolates. The CRE agar is a sensitive tool for the detection of KPC and metallo-carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae, although the detection of OXA-48 producers is less optimal. The relatively low specificity requires confirmation of carbapenemase production for isolates recovered from the CRE agar.
Asunto(s)
Proteínas Bacterianas/análisis , Técnicas Bacteriológicas/métodos , Medios de Cultivo/química , Enterobacteriaceae/enzimología , Enterobacteriaceae/aislamiento & purificación , beta-Lactamasas/análisis , Agar , Infecciones por Enterobacteriaceae/diagnóstico , Infecciones por Enterobacteriaceae/microbiología , Humanos , Sensibilidad y EspecificidadRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Unlike its squamous counterpart, therapy for cervical adenocarcinoma in situ with positive endocervical cone margin remains controversial. CASE: A 52-year-old gravida 2, para 1,0,1,1, presented with vaginal bleeding. Gynecologic history was significant for cervical cold knife conization with a positive endocervical margin and endocervical curettage with atypical endocervical cells. Repeat cone biopsy was considered unsafe given the large initial cone specimen. An extrafascial hysterectomy was performed 5 weeks later and pathology confirmed a disease-free cervix. Pap smear performed 1 year later was interpreted as recurrent adenocarcinoma but later downgraded to inflammation. Inspection and random biopsies of the vaginal cuff revealed only inflammation. Two subsequent Pap smears also returned inflammation. Seventeen months after the hysterectomy physical examination revealed a 2 x 3-cm smooth mass at the vaginal cuff. Biopsy revealed invasive adenocarcinoma. The patient underwent an upper vaginectomy followed by postoperative pelvic radiation. CONCLUSION: This case suggests that despite extrafascial hysterectomy for presumed adenocarcinoma in situ of the cervix, a residual focus could remain and present later as invasive adenocarcinoma.