RESUMEN
PURPOSE: To compare the effectiveness in reducing plaque and gingivitis of two fluoride toothpastes containing baking soda (35% and 20%) with a fluoride toothpaste control. METHODS: 319 subjects, who met entry criteria, participated in this single-center, three-cell, double-blind, randomized, parallel-group clinical study. Gingival Index (MGI), Gingival Bleeding Index (GBI), and Plaque Index (PI) were assessed at baseline, and after 6 weeks, 3 and 6 months. RESULTS: All three toothpastes significantly (P< 0.0001) reduced MGI, GBI, and PI versus baseline, and the two baking soda toothpastes significantly (P< 0.0001) reduced MGI, GBI, and PI compared to the fluoride control, at all three time points. After 6 months use, the 35% and 20% baking soda toothpastes had reduced MGI, GBI and PI by 15.0%, 46.9%, and 18.3%, and 9.4%, 25.9%, and 12.4%, respectively, compared to the control. In addition, the 35% baking soda toothpaste had reduced (P≤ 0.0005) MGI, GBI, and PI by 6.2%, 28.4%, and 6.8%, respectively, compared to the 20% baking soda toothpaste. This clinical study showed that brushing with fluoride toothpastes containing baking soda at 35% and 20% reduces plaque, gingival inflammation and bleeding more effectively than regular fluoride toothpaste. Further, it showed that 35% baking soda toothpaste was more effective in reducing these parameters than 20% baking soda toothpaste. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Fluoride toothpastes containing 20% or more baking soda can provide significant and meaningful gingival health benefits when used regularly as an adjunct to tooth brushing.
Asunto(s)
Placa Dental/prevención & control , Gingivitis/prevención & control , Índice de Placa Dental , Humanos , Bicarbonato de Sodio , Pastas de DientesRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To compare the effectiveness in reducing plaque and gingivitis of a fluoride toothpaste with 20% baking soda and a fluoride toothpaste control. METHODS: 159 subjects, who met the entry criteria, participated in this single-center, double-blind, randomized, parallel-group clinical study. Gingival Index (MGI), Gingival Bleeding Index (GBI), and Plaque Index (PI) were assessed after 4, 8, and 12 weeks use of the assigned test or control toothpaste. After 12 weeks, participants resumed 4 weeks of their customary oral hygiene after which they were re-evaluated using the same measures. RESULTS: Both toothpastes statistically significantly reduced MGI, GBI, and PI versus baseline at all-time points. Brushing with the 20% baking soda toothpaste statistically significantly reduced MGI, PI, and GBI compared to the control toothpaste at all time points. After 12 weeks, the reductions in MGI, PI, and GBI were 12.6%, 9.6%, and 44.2%, respectively. After the 4-week customary oral hygiene period, the benefits of the study period had begun to diminish, but statistically significant reductions in MGI and GBI for the test versus control were still evident. This 3-month clinical study shows that brushing with fluoride toothpaste containing 20% baking soda reduces dental plaque and concurrently reduces gingival inflammation and bleeding compared to toothpaste with fluoride alone. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Fluoride toothpaste with 20% baking soda has the potential to offer multiple oral health benefits when used as an adjunct to regular tooth brushing and, therefore, may be confidently recommended to patients.
Asunto(s)
Placa Dental/prevención & control , Gingivitis/prevención & control , Índice de Placa Dental , Humanos , Bicarbonato de Sodio/uso terapéutico , Pastas de Dientes/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to validate and calibrate an in vitro test method for screening the performance of peroxide-containing toothpastes against actual clinical whitening performance. An additional objective was to estimate the whitening performance of a new peroxide-additive gel using the in vitro methodology. METHODS: A one-month longitudinal clinical study was performed to provide a benchmark for the in vivo intrinsic whitening performance of a peroxide-containing fluoride toothpaste. An in vitro study was then conducted, using freshly prepared slurries of the same peroxide-containing toothpaste in artificial saliva, to repeatedly treat extracted human teeth with natural intrinsic stain. The effect of cumulative treatment time on whiteness was determined using objective chromometer whiteness measurements (L*, a*, and b*), and more subjective Vita Shade guide (Vitapan) comparisons, and the results were correlated. A non-peroxide fluoride toothpaste was used as a negative control. The peroxide gel additive, combined in a 1:1 ratio with each of two non-peroxide toothpastes and diluted in artificial saliva, was evaluated using the same instrumental and subjective measures for in vitro whitening efficacy. The previously evaluated peroxide toothpaste and one of the non-peroxide toothpastes were used as positive and negative controls, respectively. RESULTS: In the clinical study, the peroxide-containing toothpaste produced a linear increase in tooth whiteness with time, achieving an approximately two Vita Shade guide improvement in whiteness at the end of four weeks. The same peroxide toothpaste in vitro produced a curvilinear increase in tooth whiteness versus cumulative treatment time, with a two-shade increase being achieved in 116 minutes. The non-peroxide control toothpaste produced less than half a shade guide increase in whiteness within the first 30 minutes, and none thereafter. Both the clinical and in vitro studies indicated that further whitening can be obtained with longer use of the peroxide-containing toothpaste or peroxide-additive gel. CONCLUSION: Treatment of naturally stained teeth in vitro with the peroxide toothpaste for 116 cumulative minutes produced the same two-shade increase in whiteness as obtained with twice-daily brushing for four weeks in vivo. The peroxide-additive gel, combined with a non-peroxide toothpaste, is projected to provide a similar two-shade increase in whiteness when used twice daily for four weeks. There are indications that greater intrinsic whiteness increase would be achieved with the peroxide toothpaste or with the peroxide-additive gel plus non-peroxide toothpaste with more extended regular twice-daily use in vivo.
Asunto(s)
Peróxido de Hidrógeno/química , Blanqueamiento de Dientes/normas , Decoloración de Dientes/terapia , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Calibración , Femenino , Geles , Humanos , Técnicas In Vitro , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Cepillado Dental/instrumentación , Pastas de Dientes/química , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate and compare the effectiveness in reducing plaque of a fluoride dentifrice containing baking soda and a non-baking soda fluoride dentifrice containing an antimicrobial (triclosan/copolymer) system after a single brushing and over a four-week period of daily brushing. METHODS: A total of 207 subjects completed this randomized, blinded, parallel-group clinical study. Twenty-four hour plaque buildup was scored at baseline and after two and four weeks of twice-daily use of the products. Additionally, controlled single brushing with the assigned dentifrice, followed by post-brushing plaque assessment, was performed at the start (baseline visit) and end (Week-4 visit) of the study. Plaque was scored using the Turesky, et al. modification of Quigley-Hein Index at six sites per tooth, according to Soparkar's modification. RESULTS: Mean baseline whole mouth plaque scores for the baking soda and triclosan dentifrice groups were 2.90 +/- 0.40 and 2.90 +/- 0.39, respectively, and the difference was not statistically significant. Within-group analysis showed that both products significantly reduced the amount of plaque over the four-week period (p < 0.001). Between-group analysis showed that brushing with the baking soda dentifrice exhibited significantly greater reduction in plaque scores (p < 0.001) after two and four weeks of brushing as compared to the triclosan dentifrice. After four weeks, the mean plaque reduction for the baking soda dentifrice group (0.34 +/- 0.32) was 2.22-fold greater than that observed for the triclosan dentifrice group (0.15 +/- 0.24). Similarly, single brushing with the baking soda dentifrice showed a 1.88- to 2.08-fold greater pre- to post-brushing plaque difference as compared to the triclosan dentifrice at the baseline visit (mean plaque reduction: baking soda 0.54 +/- 0.26; triclosan 0.28 +/- 0.18; ratio 1.88X) and Week-4 visit (baking soda 0.47 +/- 0.21; triclosan 0.23 +/- 0.15; ratio 2.08X). Similar to the whole mouth scores, evaluation of various tooth sites (facial, lingual, proximal, and gingival) showed a significantly greater reduction in plaque scores for brushing with the baking soda dentifrice as compared to brushing with the triclosan dentifrice. CONCLUSION: The results of this study indicate that the baking soda dentifrice was more effective than the non-baking soda, antimicrobial dentifrice in plaque removal after a single tooth brushing, and in maintaining significantly lower plaque levels during a four-week period of twice daily, unsupervised tooth brushing.
Asunto(s)
Antiinfecciosos Locales/uso terapéutico , Placa Dental/prevención & control , Dentífricos/química , Bicarbonato de Sodio/uso terapéutico , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Análisis de Varianza , Antiinfecciosos Locales/química , Biopelículas/efectos de los fármacos , Mezclas Complejas/química , Mezclas Complejas/uso terapéutico , Estudios Cruzados , Índice de Placa Dental , Dentífricos/uso terapéutico , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Femenino , Fluoruros/química , Fluoruros/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Peróxido de Hidrógeno , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Valores de Referencia , Ácido Silícico , Método Simple Ciego , Bicarbonato de Sodio/química , Cepillado Dental/métodos , Pastas de Dientes , Resultado del Tratamiento , Triclosán/química , Triclosán/uso terapéutico , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: An earlier clinical study demonstrated that brushing with a commercial Arm & Hammer dentifrice containing baking soda physically removed significantly more plaque than brushing with either of two commercial dentifrices which did not contain baking soda. However, little has been done to confirm these results and to compare baking soda-containing dentifrices with more recently commercialized non-baking soda dentifrice formulations. The objective of this study was to compare commercial dentifrices containing 20% to 65% baking soda and commercial dentifrices without baking soda in enhancing plaque removal efficacy of tooth brushing. METHODS: Five randomized, controlled, blinded, crossover clinical studies were performed among healthy adult volunteers who provided informed consent. After approximately 24 hours without oral hygiene, subjects with sufficient plaque were enrolled in the study phase. Plaque was scored before and after supervised brushing for one minute using the Turesky, et al. modification of the Quigley-Hein Plaque Index at six sites per tooth according to Soparkar's modification as described by Lobene, et al. In each study, wash-out periods with a regular dentifrice not evaluated in the study separated each product treatment. RESULTS: In all studies, every dentifrice exhibited a significant (p < 0.0001) reduction in 24-hour plaque scores. Between-group comparisons of whole mouth plaque scores in all five studies demonstrated that brushing with baking soda dentifrices resulted in statistically greater (p < 0.01) reductions in whole mouth mean plaque scores than brushing with dentifrices that did not contain baking soda. Results on other tooth surfaces, such as facial, lingual, proximal, and gingival surfaces also demonstrated statistically greater (p < 0.05) reductions in mean plaque scores for the baking soda-containing dentifrices as compared to the baking soda-free dentifrices. In three of the studies comparing different levels of baking soda, brushing with dentifrices with higher concentrations of baking soda consistently removed numerically more plaque than those containing lower levels. In one of these three studies, the difference in plaque removal between the baking soda dentifrices reached statistical significance. The results suggest a positive relationship between plaque removal efficiency and baking soda concentration. CONCLUSION: The collective results from the five controlled clinical studies on over 270 subjects reported in this paper, consistently demonstrate that Arm & Hammer baking soda dentifrices enhanced plaque removal effectiveness of tooth brushing to a significantly greater extent than the non-baking soda dentifrice products.