RESUMEN
PURPOSE: To investigate whether P-glycoprotein (Pgp) protects the in vitro BBB against the cytotoxic effects of anti-tumour drugs. METHODS: In an in vitro BBB coculture model the influence of the anti-microtubule drugs vinblastine, colchicine, paclitaxel and the non-anti-microtubule drugs doxorubicin, fluorouracil and etoposide in the absence or presence of Pgp modulators on the trans-endothelial electrical resistance (TEER), which is an indicator for the integrity, was investigated. RESULTS: In the absence of Pgp modulators vinblastine, colchicine and paclitaxel dose dependently decreased TEER values to less than 20% of control. Non-anti-microtubule drugs did not affect TEER values. Following competitive inhibition of Pgp by various Pgp modulators and substrates, even low concentrations of vinblastine, colchicine and paclitaxel substantially decreased TEER. IC50 values of LY 335979, SDZ-PSC 833, cyclosporin A, and verapamil were 0.03, 0.25, 0.46, and 13.7 microM, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that Pgp normally protects the in vitro BBB against the disruptive effects of anti-microtubule drugs, but its integrity is lost when anti-microtubule drugs are used in combination with potent Pgp modulators. In addition, this procedure offers the possibility to characterize Pgp modulators and substrates with respect to their efficacy and to elucidate drug interactions at the level of Pgp.
Asunto(s)
Miembro 1 de la Subfamilia B de Casetes de Unión a ATP/antagonistas & inhibidores , Antineoplásicos/farmacología , Barrera Hematoencefálica/fisiología , Microtúbulos/efectos de los fármacos , Algoritmos , Animales , Astrocitos/efectos de los fármacos , Astrocitos/metabolismo , Barrera Hematoencefálica/efectos de los fármacos , Bovinos , Permeabilidad de la Membrana Celular/efectos de los fármacos , Impedancia Eléctrica , Endotelio Vascular/citología , Endotelio Vascular/efectos de los fármacos , Endotelio Vascular/metabolismo , Modelos BiológicosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the involvement of P-glycoprotein (Pgp) and the multidrug resistance-associated protein (MRP) on the active transport of the HIV protease inhibitors amprenavir, ritonavir and indinavir. METHODS: The transport behaviour of ritonavir, indinavir and amprenavir in the presence and absence of Pgp modulators and probenecid was investigated in an in vitro blood--brain barrier (BBB) co-culture model and in monolayers of LLC-PK1, LLC-PK1:MDR1, LLC-PK1:MRP1 and Caco-2 cells. RESULTS: All three HIV protease inhibitors showed polarized transport in the BBB model, LLC-PK1:MDR1 and Caco-2 cell line. The Pgp modulators SDZ-PSC 833, verapamil and LY 335979 inhibited polarized transport, although their potency was dependent on both the cell model and the HIV protease inhibitor used. Ritonavir and indinavir also showed polarized transport in the LLC-PK1 and LLC-PK1:MRP1 cell line, which could be inhibited by probenecid. HIV protease inhibitors were not able to inhibit competitively polarized transport of other HIV protease inhibitors in the LLC-PK1:MDR1 cell line. CONCLUSIONS: Amprenavir, ritonavir and indinavir are mainly actively transported by Pgp, while MRP also plays a role in the transport of ritonavir and indinavir. This indicates that inhibition of Pgp could be useful therapeutically to increase HIV protease inhibitor concentrations in the brain and in other tissues and cells expressing Pgp. The HIV protease inhibitors were not able to inhibit Pgp-mediated efflux when given simultaneously, suggesting that simultaneous administration of these drugs will not increase the concentration of antiretroviral drugs in the brain.