RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to determine the safety, efficacy, and applicability of percutaneous axillary artery (pAxA) access in patients requiring upper extremity large sheath access during complex aortic, cardiac, and peripheral endovascular procedures. We also take this opportunity to address the potential cost-benefits offered by pAxA access compared to open upper extremity access. METHODS: A total of 26 consecutive patients, between June 2018 and October 2020, underwent endovascular intervention, requiring upper extremity access (UEA). Ultrasound-guided, percutaneous access of the axillary artery was used in all 26 patients with off-label use of pre-close technique with Perclose ProGlide closure devices. Access sites accommodated sheath sizes that ranged from 6 to 14 French (F). End points were technical success and access site-related complications including isolated neuropathies, hematoma, distal embolization, access-site thrombosis, and post-operative bleeding requiring secondary interventions. Technical success was defined as successful arterial closure intraoperatively with no evidence of stenosis, occlusion, or persistent bleeding, requiring additional intervention. RESULTS: Of the 26 patients requiring pAxA access, 15 underwent complex endovascular aortic aneurysm repairs (EVAR) with branched, fenestrated, snorkel, or parallel endografts, 6 underwent peripheral vascular interventions, and 5 underwent cardiac interventions. Fifty-three percent accommodated sheath sizes of 12F or higher. Technical success was achieved in 100% of cases with no major perioperative access complications requiring additional open or endovascular procedures. In our series, we had one post-operative mortality secondary to myocardial infarction in a patient with significant coronary artery disease. CONCLUSIONS: Our data again demonstrated the proposed safety and efficacy attributable to pAxA access, while extending its application to wide spectrum of endovascular interventions which included peripheral or coronary vascular in addition to complex EVAR.
Asunto(s)
Implantación de Prótesis Vascular , Cateterismo Periférico , Procedimientos Endovasculares , Arteria Axilar/diagnóstico por imagen , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/efectos adversos , Cateterismo Periférico/métodos , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Arteria Femoral , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Atherosclerotic carotid stenosis associated with a mobile carotid plaque (MCP) is a relatively rare entity, observed in less than 1 in 2,000 carotid ultrasound examinations. As such, the natural history of this lesion and risk for neurological thromboembolic complications are not well defined. Small case reports have described treatment varying from medical management with anticoagulation, to carotid endarterectomy, and more recently, carotid stenting. We present two patients with carotid stenosis associated with a MCP. A distinct MCP component that varied with the cardiac cycle was clearly delineated on ultrasound in both patients. Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) at the time of carotid stenting confirmed the MCP. Successful carotid angioplasty and stenting was performed in both patients with resolution of the MCP documented on IVUS and follow-up duplex ultrasound. Although the definitive treatment method remains uncertain, carotid stenting is a viable option for treatment in patients with MCPs.
Asunto(s)
Angioplastia de Balón/instrumentación , Arteria Carótida Común/patología , Estenosis Carotídea/terapia , Placa Aterosclerótica , Stents , Túnica Íntima/patología , Anciano , Angioplastia de Balón/efectos adversos , Arteria Carótida Común/diagnóstico por imagen , Estenosis Carotídea/diagnóstico por imagen , Estenosis Carotídea/patología , Humanos , Masculino , Resultado del Tratamiento , Túnica Íntima/diagnóstico por imagen , Ultrasonografía Doppler en Color , Ultrasonografía IntervencionalRESUMEN
Large celiac artery aneurysms are associated with a high rupture and mortality risk. Traditionally, open surgical repair has been the mainstay of treatment. Endovascular alternatives have been increasingly described, ranging from coil embolization to exclusion with covered stent grafts. Certain features such as a short wide neck, small vessel diameters, and severe vessel tortuosity can limit these two options. We describe a 75-year-old man with a splenic and celiac trunk aneurysm that was treated using a combination of coil embolization to occlude the outflow artery and aneurysm sac, followed by an aortic stent graft cuff to block the inflow. This resulted in successful exclusion of the splenic and celiac artery aneurysms while preserving flow to both the spleen and liver through collateral pathways.