RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Prostate cancer is a common cancer in men. Detection methods include the measurement of biomarkers: prostate-specific antigen (PSA), free PSA, [-2]proPSA, and the calculated indices: fPSA/tPSA ratio and Prostate Health Index (PHI). Proper preanalytical conditions are crucial for precise measurement and failure to adhere to protocols or regulations can influence the diagnostic algorithm. We assessed the stability of the above-mentioned biomarkers, fPSA/tPSA ratio and PHI, under various pre-analytical conditions. METHODS: Serum samples from 45 males were collected and stored under specific conditions before tPSA, fPSA, and [-2]proPSA were measured. Subsequently, the fPSA/tPSA and PHI were calculated. RESULTS: tPSA, fPSA, and [-2]proPSA remained stable during the two freeze-thaw cycles. Storage at 4°C and 22°C resulted in stable tPSA concentrations. However, fPSA levels decreased and [-2]proPSA levels increased over time. The fPSA/tPSA ratio remained stable for 72 h, at which point a decrease was observed in the samples kept at 4°C and 22°C. A gradual increase in PHI was observed in the samples kept at 4°C and 22°C. CONCLUSIONS: All biomarkers remained stable during two freeze-thaw cycles. tPSA was the most stable analyte when stored at 4°C, as well as at RT. A gradual increase of [-2]proPSA and a slight decrease in fPSA were observed during the storage test. This led to a decrease in the fPSA/tPSA ratio and an elevation in the PHI. We therefore recommend measuring prostate biomarkers promptly following blood collection. IMPACT: Understanding the pre-analytical stability of prostate biomarkers helps prevent false positive results and improve the accuracy of diagnostics for prostate cancer.

Asunto(s)

Antígeno Prostático Específico , Neoplasias de la Próstata , Humanos , Masculino , Próstata/patología , Antígeno Prostático Específico/sangre , Antígeno Prostático Específico/química , Neoplasias de la Próstata/diagnóstico

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Scientific studies point to a significant global vitamin D deficiency. The recommended dose of vitamin D for the adult population in Central Europe is 800-2000 IU/day. The aim of our study was to determine whether doses of 1000 IU or 2000 IU of vitamin D3 are adequate to achieve the sufficiency reference values of [25(OH)D]. METHODS: Seventy-two healthy volunteers, average age twenty-two, took part in the study. The study was conducted from October to March in order to eliminate intra-dermal vitamin D production. Vitamin D3 in an oleaginous mixture was used. The participants used either 1000 IU or 2000 IU/daily for two 60-day periods with a 30-day break. RESULTS: The dose of 1000 IU, taken for 60 days, increased vitamin D levels relatively little. Furthermore, serum vitamin D levels decreased in the 30 days following the cessation of supplementation. Taking 2000 IU daily led to a sharp increase in serum levels which plateaued 30 days after the subjects stopped using vitamin D3 drops. CONCLUSIONS: Both doses, taken daily, can help maintain adequate vitamin D levels during the winter months. A daily dose of 2000 IU, however, maintained the desired levels of vitamin D for a longer period.