RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Surgical wound infection is one of the leading causes of healthcare-associated infections. One of the most common measures for its reduction is the pre-surgical preparation. The aim of this study was to evaluate the adequacy to the pre-surgical protocol in patients undergoing neck surgery and the relationship with the incidence of surgical wound infection. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Observational cohort study, conducted from January 2011 to December 2017. Variables related to patient, pre-surgical preparation and infection were collected. Infection rate was calculated after a maximum period of 30days after surgery. The effect of the pre-surgical preparation's adequacy and infection was evaluated. RESULTS: The study included 131 patients. The global adequacy of the pre-surgical protocol was 84.7%, being the main cause of inadequacy the application of the mouthwash (7.6% of the interventions). The overall incidence of surgical wound infection during the follow-up period was 4.6% (95%CI: 1.0%-8.2%). No relationship between the adequacy to the protocol and the presence of infection was found (P=.59). CONCLUSIONS: Adequacy of the pre-surgical preparation in our hospital was high and the incidence of surgical wound infection was low, and no relationship was found between the two. The results show a high safety culture in this surgery. However, there is still room for improvement in the quality of care of our patients.
Asunto(s)
Protocolos Clínicos/normas , Cuello/cirugía , Cuidados Preoperatorios/normas , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Calidad de la Atención de Salud/normas , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/prevención & control , Anciano , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To assess compliance with the antibiotic prophylaxis protocol for patients who underwent renal surgery and its effect on the incidence of surgical wound infection. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We performed a prospective cohort study and assessed the overall compliance and each aspect of the antibiotic prophylaxis (start, administration route, antibiotic of choice, duration and dosage) and reported the compliance rates. The qualitative variables were compared with the chi-squared test, and the quantitative variables were compared with Student's t-test. We studied the effect of antibiotic prophylaxis compliance on the incidence of surgical wound infection in renal surgery, with the relative risk. RESULTS: The study included 266 patients, with an overall compliance rate of 90.6%. The major cause of noncompliance (3.8%) was the start of the prophylaxis, and the incidence rate of surgical wound infections was 3.4%. We found no relationship between antibiotic prophylaxis noncompliance and surgical wound infections (RR=0.26; 95%CI: 0.1-1.2; P>.05). Laparoscopic surgery had a lower incidence of surgical wound infections than open surgery (RR=0.10; 95%CI: 0.01-0.79). CONCLUSIONS: The antibiotic prophylaxis compliance was high. The incidence of surgical site infection was low, and there was no relationship between the incidence of surgical site infection and antibiotic prophylaxis compliance. The incidence of infection was lower in laparoscopic surgery.
Asunto(s)
Profilaxis Antibiótica , Nefrectomía , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/epidemiología , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/prevención & control , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios ProspectivosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Antibiotic prophylaxis is the most suitable tool for preventing surgical wound infection. This study evaluated adequacy of antibiotic prophylaxis in surgery for knee arthroplasty and its effect on surgical site infection. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Prospective cohort study. We assessed the degree of adequacy of antibiotic prophylaxis, the causes of non-adequacy, and the effect of non-adequacy on surgical site infection. Incidence of surgical site infection was studied after a maximum incubation period of a year. To assess the effect of prophylaxis non-adequacy on surgical site infection we used the relative risk adjusted with the aid of a logistic regression model. RESULTS: The study covered a total of 1749 patients. Antibiotic prophylaxis was indicated in all patients and administered in 99.8% of cases, with an overall protocol adequacy of 77.6%. The principal cause of non-compliance was the duration of prescription of the antibiotics (46.5%). Cumulative incidence of surgical site infection was 1.43%. No relationship was found between prophylaxis adequacy and surgical infection (RR=1.15; 95% CI: .31-2.99) (P>.05). DISCUSSION: Surveillance and infection control programs enable risk factors of infection and improvement measures to be assessed. Monitoring infection rates enables us to reduce their incidence. CONCLUSIONS: Adequacy of antibiotic prophylaxis was high but could be improved. We did not find a relationship between prophylaxis adequacy and surgical site infection rate.
Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Profilaxis Antibiótica/estadística & datos numéricos , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla , Adhesión a Directriz/estadística & datos numéricos , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Cuidados Preoperatorios , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/prevención & control , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Enterococcus faecalis , Infecciones por Escherichia coli/epidemiología , Infecciones por Escherichia coli/etiología , Infecciones por Escherichia coli/prevención & control , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Infecciones por Bacterias Grampositivas/epidemiología , Infecciones por Bacterias Grampositivas/etiología , Infecciones por Bacterias Grampositivas/prevención & control , Humanos , Incidencia , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Estudios Prospectivos , Ajuste de Riesgo , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/epidemiología , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/etiología , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/prevención & control , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/epidemiología , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the usefulness of procalcitonin (PCT) and other analytical parameters (white blood cell count [WBC], C-reactive protein [CRP]) as markers of acute renal damage in children after a first febrile or afebrile urinary tract infection (UTI). METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted on children with a first episode of UTI admitted between January 2009 to December 2011, and in whom serum PCT, CRP and white blood cell count were measured, as well as assessing the acute renal damage with renal scintigraphy with 99mTc-DMSA (DMSA) within the first 72h after referral. A descriptive study was performed and ROC curves were plotted, with optimal cut-off points calculated for each parameter. RESULTS: The 101 enrolled patients were divided into two groups according to DMSA scintigraphy results, with 64 patients being classified with acute pyelonephritis (APN), and 37 with UTI. The mean WBC, CRP and PCT values were significantly higher in patients with APN with respect to normal acute DMSA. The area under the ROC curve was 0.862 for PCR, 0.774 for WBC, and 0.731 for PCT. The optimum statistical cut-off value for PCT was 0.285ng/ml (sensitivity 71.4% and specificity 75%). CONCLUSION: Although the mean levels of fever, WBC, CRP, and PCT were significantly increased in patients with APN than in those who had UTI, the sensitivity and specificity of these analytical parameters are unable to predict the existence of acute renal damage, making the contribution by renal DMSA scintigraphy essential.
Asunto(s)
Calcitonina/sangre , Pielonefritis/sangre , Enfermedad Aguda , Adolescente , Biomarcadores , Proteína C-Reactiva/análisis , Niño , Preescolar , Manejo de la Enfermedad , Infecciones por Escherichia coli/sangre , Infecciones por Escherichia coli/diagnóstico , Infecciones por Escherichia coli/diagnóstico por imagen , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Riñón/diagnóstico por imagen , Infecciones por Klebsiella/sangre , Infecciones por Klebsiella/diagnóstico , Infecciones por Klebsiella/diagnóstico por imagen , Recuento de Leucocitos , Masculino , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Pielonefritis/diagnóstico , Pielonefritis/diagnóstico por imagen , Pielonefritis/tratamiento farmacológico , Radiofármacos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Ácido Dimercaptosuccínico de Tecnecio Tc 99mRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Antibiotic prophylaxis is the most suitable tool for preventing surgical site infection (SSI), so the development of guidelines and assessment of its monitoring is essential. In this study protocol compliance of antibiotic prophylaxis in rectal surgery and the effect of its adequacy in terms of pre-ention of SSI was assessed. METHODS: Prospective cohort study was conducted from 1 January 2009 to 30 December 2015. The degree of compliance with antibiotic prophylaxis and causes of non-compliance in rectal surgery was evaluated. The incidence of SSI was studied after a maximum period of 30 days of incubation. To assess the effect of prophylaxis non-compliance on SSI the relative risk (RR) adjusted with the aid of a logistic regression model was used. RESULTS: The study covered a total of 244 patients. The patients infected reached 20 cases with a SSI cumulative incidence of 8.2% (CI95%: 4.8-11.6). Antibiotic prophylaxis was indicated in all patients and was administered in 98% of cases, with an overall protocol compliance 92.5%. The principal cause of non-compliance was the choice of antibiotic 55.6% (n=10). The effect of inadequacy of antibiotic prophylaxis on surgical infection was RR=0.58, CI95%: 0.10-4.10 (P>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Compliance with antibiotic prophylaxis was high. No relationship between the adequacy of prophylaxis and incidence of surgical site infection in rectal surgery was found.
Asunto(s)
Profilaxis Antibiótica/normas , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos del Sistema Digestivo/métodos , Recto/cirugía , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Adhesión a Directriz , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Cooperación del Paciente , Estudios Prospectivos , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/prevención & controlRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Several methods are available for measuring glycosylated A1c hemoglobin (HbA1c), all rapid methods for point of care use in a clinical or laboratory setting. This study attempts to compare the diagnostic agreement between two methods for detection of HbA1c. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A descriptive cross-sectional study of diagnostic agreement was carried out in the Los Carmenes Health Centre. Two groups of patients -with and without type 2 diabetes- were consecutively included. A method for point-of-care use in a Primary Care Clinic setting (DCA(TM) Systems Siemens(®)) was compared with a laboratory test (chromatographic analysis). An analysis was made of the mean concentration of HbA1c, the agreement between methods, using the intra-class correlation coefficient (CCLA1) and the Bland-Altman method. RESULTS: A total of 102 patients were included, 62 diabetic (60.8%) and 40 non-diabetic (39.2%). The overall mean HbA1c was 6.46% (SD=0.88) in the analysis using capillary blood in the clinic with the DCA™ system, and 6.44% (SD=0.86) using the laboratory test (P>.05). The degree of agreement between the two tests was 0.975 (95% CI: 0.963-0.983). The mean of the differences between the results of the two assessed tests was 0.024 (SD=0.27). The percentage of points outside the limits of optimal agreement, as defined in the Bland-Altman graph, was 2.5%. CONCLUSIONS: Diagnostic agreement between a method for point-of-care use in a Primary Health Care Clinic and a laboratory test was very high. Detection at the point-of-care allows a quick and simple assessment of HbA1c.