RESUMEN
AIM: This observational cohort study aimed: (i) to determine retrospectively after a 1- to 12-year follow-up period, the strength and independence of the association of various patient-, tooth- and treatment-related prognostic variables with the outcome of root canal treatment in patients with pre-therapeutic apical periodontitis; and (ii) to establish the concordance between those predictors evaluated by both cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and digital periapical radiography (DPR). METHODOLOGY: The study cohort included 125 teeth in 84 individuals. The postoperative clinical signs/symptoms, plus DPR/CBCT-PAI estimations, were used to determine the healing outcome. For statistical analysis, results were dichotomized into completely healed periapical structures versus persistent disease cases. The association between candidate predictor variables with persistent disease was analysed individually and adjusted for confounders using a multivariate binary logistic regression model. RESULTS: The success rate was 53.6%. After logistic regression analysis, mandibular tooth location, periapical lesion size >10 mm, poor quality of the coronal restoration, lack of magnification/illumination, lack of disinfection of gutta-percha, time elapsed to definitive coronal restoration >1 week and poor density of root canal filling remained as robust predictors of failures. Concordance between DPR and CBCT scores varied from moderate to almost perfect agreement. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this study suggest that several tooth- and treatment-related predictor variables, including tooth location, periapical radiolucency size, quality of the coronal restoration, magnification/illumination, disinfection of gutta-percha, time elapsed to definitive coronal restoration, as well as, the density of root canal filling may act strongly and independently for determining the root canal treatment outcome in teeth with pre-therapeutic apical periodontitis.
Asunto(s)
Cavidad Pulpar , Periodontitis Periapical , Estudios de Cohortes , Tomografía Computarizada de Haz Cónico , Humanos , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tratamiento del Conducto RadicularRESUMEN
AIM: To investigate, retrospectively over a 1- to 16-year follow-up period, the strength and independence of the association of different patient-, tooth- and surgery-related prognostic variables with the outcome of periradicular surgery. METHODOLOGY: The study cohort included 171 teeth in 154 subjects. Clinical and radiographic measures along with the follow-up period were used to determine the healing outcome. For statistical analysis, results were dichotomized into healed/healing versus asymptomatic function/persistent disease cases. The association between candidate prognostic variables and asymptomatic function/persistent disease was analysed individually and adjusted for confounding using a multivariate binary logistic regression model. RESULTS: The percentage of success (healed/healing cases) was found to be 83.6%, whereas the percentage of failure (asymptomatic function/persistent disease cases) was found to be 16.4%. Whilst univariate analysis revealed a positive association of the presence of preoperative signs/symptoms, unsatisfactory quality of the coronal restoration, pronounced root-end resection bevel and inadequate quality of root-end filling with asymptomatic function/persistent disease, after multivariate binary logistic regression analysis only the unsatisfactory quality of the coronal restoration and inadequate quality of root-end filling were strongly and independently associated with disease status. Confounding and interaction effects between candidate prognostic variables was noted. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this study suggest that whilst the quality of both the coronal restoration and the root-end filling might be the foremost prognostic variables in periradicular surgery, there are synergistic biological interactive and mutually confounding effects with respect to root-end resection bevel and preoperative signs and/or symptoms that may be also associated with an increased proportion of failures after periradicular surgery.