RESUMEN
PURPOSE: The PiCCO System is a relatively new device allowing intermittent cardiac output monitoring by aortic transpulmonary thermodilution technique (Aorta intermittent) and continuous cardiac output monitoring by pulse contour analysis (Aorta continuous). The objective of this study was to assess the level of agreement of Aorta intermittent and Aorta continuous with intermittent (PA intermittent) and continuous cardiac output (PA continuous) measured through a special pulmonary artery catheter (Vigilance System SvO(2)/CCO Monitor) in patients undergoing single- or double-lung transplantation. METHODS: Measurements were obtained in 58 patients: at four time points in patients undergoing single-lung transplantation and at six time points in those undergoing double-lung transplantation. Bland and Altman and correlation analyses were used for statistical evaluation. RESULTS: We found close agreement between the techniques. Mean bias between Aorta intermittent and PA intermittent and between Aorta continuous and PA continuous was 0.18 L x min(-1) (2SD of differences between methods = 1.59 L x min(-1)) and -0.07 L x min(-1) (2SD of differences between methods = 1.46 L x min(-1)) respectively. Mean bias between PA continuous and PA intermittent and Aorta continuous and PA intermittent was 0.15 L x min(-1) (2SD of differences between methods = 1.39 L x min(-1)) and 0.08 L x min(-1) (2SD of differences between methods = 1.43 L x min(-1)). CONCLUSION: Measurements with the aortic transpulmonary thermodilution technique give continuous and intermittent values that agree with the pulmonary thermodilution method which is still the current clinical standard.
Asunto(s)
Gasto Cardíaco , Trasplante de Pulmón , Monitoreo Intraoperatorio/instrumentación , Aorta/fisiología , Cateterismo , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Monitoreo Intraoperatorio/métodos , Arteria Pulmonar/fisiología , Termodilución/instrumentaciónRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To compare two non-muscle relaxant anesthetic techniques in myasthenic patients undergoing trans-sternal thymectomy, evaluating the intra- and postoperative conditions including the early extubation in the operating room. METHODS: Sixty-eight consecutive myasthenic patients undergoing trans-sternal thymectomy were prospectively randomized in two groups: propofol and sevoflurane. In both groups anesthesia was induced with propofol (1-2 mg x kg(-1)) and intubation performed after topical anesthesia of the airway with lidocaine. Anesthesia was maintained in the propofol group (36 patients) with a continuous propofol infusion (3-6 mg x kg(-1) x hr(-1)) and nitrous oxide and, in the sevoflurane group (32 patients), with sevoflurane (end-tidal 1-1.5%) in O2:N2O. Intubating conditions, hemodynamic changes, neuromuscular transmission, postoperative intensive care unit and hospital length of stay and complications were evaluated. Data were analyzed with repeated measure two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), Chi square test and Student's t test. RESULTS: Intubating conditions were good in all patients. There were no hemodynamic changes. All patients were extubated in the operating room and none had to be re-intubated for postoperative respiratory depression. Neuromuscular transmission showed minimal changes, more important in the sevoflurane group, and at the end of the procedure the recovery was complete in all patients. We did not observe any other significant differences between the two groups studied. CONCLUSION: Our data show that these two anesthetic techniques allow the early extubation of myasthenic patients in the operating room.