RESUMEN
Opioid-induced adrenal insufficiency is a known side effect of chronic opioid use, but opioid-induced adrenal insufficiency related to chronic buprenorphine-naloxone therapy is less well-known. We present a case of a patient with opioid use disorder on chronic buprenorphine-naloxone therapy admitted with presumed septic shock and found to be in an adrenal crisis. The patient presented to our hospital with a shock-like presentation, requiring vasopressors, intubation, empiric glucocorticoids, and antibiotics. As her steroids were weaned, she developed bradycardia and blood glucose in the 60s. A low- and high-dose cosyntropin stimulation test confirmed the presence of secondary adrenal insufficiency, presumed to be due to her chronic buprenorphine-naloxone use. She was discharged on maintenance hydrocortisone and continued buprenorphine-naloxone therapy. With the high prevalence of opioid use disorder and the common need for medication for opioid use disorder, it is important that healthcare providers properly identify opioid-induced adrenal insufficiency in order to quickly and correctly diagnose and treat adrenal crises.
RESUMEN
CASE PRESENTATION: A 67-year-old man with a history of hypertension, type 2 diabetes, and COPD requiring supplemental oxygen at baseline (4 L by nasal cannula) was admitted to the hospital for progressive dyspnea and dysphagia in the context of a newly diagnosed supraglottic mass.
Asunto(s)
Trastornos de Deglución , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Anciano , Cánula , Trastornos de Deglución/diagnóstico , Trastornos de Deglución/etiología , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/complicaciones , Disnea/diagnóstico , Disnea/etiología , Humanos , MasculinoRESUMEN
AIM: To determine the readmission rate, its reasons, predictors, and cost of 30-d readmission in patients with cirrhosis and ascites. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of the nationwide readmission database (NRD) was performed during the calendar year 2013. All adults cirrhotics with a diagnosis of ascites, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, or hepatic encephalopathy were identified by ICD-9 codes. Multivariate analysis was performed to assess predictors of 30-d readmission and cost of readmission. RESULTS: Of the 59597 patients included in this study, 18319 (31%) were readmitted within 30 d. Majority (58%) of readmissions were for liver related reasons. Paracentesis was performed in 29832 (50%) patients on index admission. Independent predictors of 30-d readmission included age < 40 (OR: 1.39; CI: 1.19-1.64), age 40-64 (OR: 1.19; CI: 1.09-1.30), Medicaid (OR: 1.21; CI: 1.04-1.41) and Medicare coverage (OR: 1.13; CI: 1.02-1.26), > 3 Elixhauser comorbidity (OR: 1.13; CI: 1.05-1.22), nonalcoholic cirrhosis (OR: 1.16; CI: 1.10-1.23), paracentesis on index admission (OR: 1.28; CI: 1.21-1.36) and having hepatocellular carcinoma (OR: 1.21; CI: 1.05; 1.39). Cost of index admission was similar in patients readmitted and not readmitted (P-value: 0.34); however cost of care was significantly more on 30 d readmission ($30959 ± 762) as compared to index admission ($12403 ± 378), P-value: < 0.001. CONCLUSION: Cirrhotic patients with ascites have a 33% chance of readmission within 30-d. Younger patients, with public insurance, nonalcoholic cirrhosis and increased comorbidity who underwent paracentesis are at increased risk of readmission. Risk factors for unplanned readmission should be targeted given these patients have higher healthcare utilization.