Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Minerva Obstet Gynecol ; 75(6): 503-511, 2023 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35758093

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: To use the algorithm of the Fetal Medicine Foundation (FMF) to determine the cutoff point for prediction of preeclampsia (PE) in a Brazilian population. METHODS: Randomized clinical trial with 274 nulliparous patients at gestational age between 11 and 13 weeks and 6 days. To calculate the risk of PE, the algorithm available at the website of the FMF (http://fetalmedicine.org/research/assess/preeclampsia/first-trimester) was used. Among the patients, 138 did not use preventive measures (100 mg/day aspirin [ASA]). Youden's criteria were used to calculate the cutoff point. To test the effectiveness of 100 mg/day ASA in preventing PE, the patients were divided into two groups - at risk above and below the cutoff point. RESULTS: In the group comprising the 135 patients that did not take ASA, the median age was 22 years, the Body Mass Index (BMI) was 59.3 kg/m2, the mean arterial pressure (MAP) was 73.3 mmHg, and the mean pulsatility index of uterine artery Doppler was 1.71. The median gestational age at delivery was 39.3 (38.1-40.3) weeks. The prevalence of PE was 11.1%. In our sample, the use of 100 mg/day ASA reduced total PE by 36.3% (prevalence of PE in the group above the cutoff point was 19% and 12.1% when ASA and placebo were used, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The cutoff point defined for prediction of PE was 1:155 with sensitivity of 80%, specificity of 57.5%, positive predictive value of 19.1%, and negative predictive value of 95%, which should help to select patients that will benefit from prophylactic ASA.


Asunto(s)
Preeclampsia , Femenino , Humanos , Embarazo , Adulto Joven , Algoritmos , Aspirina/uso terapéutico , Brasil/epidemiología , Perinatología , Preeclampsia/diagnóstico , Preeclampsia/epidemiología , Preeclampsia/prevención & control , Primer Trimestre del Embarazo
2.
Oxid Med Cell Longev ; 2021: 6657434, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34873431

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: First-degree relatives of gastric cancer patients are at increased risk of developing gastric cancer. Increased oxidative stress, including lipid peroxidation, has been associated with gastric carcinogenesis. Whether first-degree relatives of gastric cancer patients have increased oxidative stress remains unknown. We aimed to compare oxidative stress in patients with gastric cancer, their first-degree relatives, and dyspeptic controls. METHODS: A total of 155 patients undergoing upper endoscopy were prospectively enrolled, including 50 with gastric cancer, 49 first-degree relatives of gastric cancer patients, and 56 controls. Serum concentrations of malondialdehyde (MDA) and glutathione) and activities of superoxide dismutase (SOD) and catalase were measured. Multivariate analysis adjusting for sex, age, smoking status, and alcohol consumption was performed. RESULTS: Lipid peroxidation, as measured by concentration of MDA (nmol/mL), was higher (p = 0.04), and glutathione levels were lower (p < 0.001) in the gastric cancer group compared to controls. There was no difference in the catalase activity among the groups. There was no difference in glutathione and MDA concentration or catalase activity between the different stages of gastric cancer based on the TNM classification. Relatives of gastric cancer patients had higher glutathione concentration (µmol/mL) compared to gastric cancer patients (262.5 vs. 144.6; p = 0.018), while there was no difference in MDA concentration. Catalase and superoxide dismutase activity were lower in the gastric cancer group (3.82 vs. 0.91; p < 0.001 and 1.04 vs. 0.6; p < 0.001) compared to their first-degree relatives. Interestingly, MDA concentration in the first-degree relative group was higher than in the control group (7.9 vs. 5.1; p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, similarly to gastric cancer patients, their first-degree relatives were found to have increased oxidative stress compared to controls. Further studies are warranted to validate this observation and to better understand the role of oxidative stress as a possible biomarker in this population.


Asunto(s)
Anamnesis/métodos , Estrés Oxidativo/fisiología , Neoplasias Gástricas/fisiopatología , Adulto , Brasil , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Estudios Prospectivos
3.
Neurol Sci ; 42(3): 935-942, 2021 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32671582

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Peripheral neuropathies (PN) and primary headaches (PH) are common comorbidities in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients. We aimed to evaluate whether PN and PH affect the same subgroups of IBD patients. METHODS: Since 2004, we established a cohort study to evaluate neurological diseases in IBD patients. Over 2 years, all consecutive (N = 155) IBD patients (either Crohn's disease (CD) or ulcerative colitis (UC) were evaluated for the presence of PN and PH. PH were also evaluated in dyspeptic patients (N = 84) and IBD relatives (controls, N = 101). After neurological evaluation, symptomatic patients underwent skin wrinkling test to evaluate small fiber function and/or electromyography. RESULTS: Headaches and migraine were more prevalent in IBD than control patients: 52.3 and 34.2% vs. 40.6 and 20.8% (P < 0.05). Migraine was 2.6 times more common in CD patients than controls (CI = 1.34-5.129) and 8.6 times (13.3 times in the CD group) more common in men with IBD (P < 0.05). Headache and migraine were also more common in dyspeptic patients (P < 0.05). Chi-square, univariate, and multivariate regression analysis did not disclose any association between PN, headache, or PH (P > 0.05). Multivariate regression analysis disclosed that headaches were more prevalent in women, co-existing psychiatric disease, IBD, CD, and UC. After age, gender distribution, and prevalence of hypertension and psychiatric diseases were matched among the groups, there were still differences in the prevalence of headaches and migraine among IBD, CD, and UC versus control patients. CONCLUSION: In summary, PH and PN are common in IBD and do not affect the same subgroups of patients.


Asunto(s)
Colitis Ulcerosa , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino , Enfermedades del Sistema Nervioso Periférico , Estudios de Cohortes , Colitis Ulcerosa/complicaciones , Colitis Ulcerosa/epidemiología , Femenino , Cefalea/epidemiología , Humanos , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino/complicaciones , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino/epidemiología , Masculino
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA