RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The aim was to investigate the total prevalence of known and undiagnosed diabetes mellitus (DM), and the association of DM with perioperative complications following elective, infrarenal, open surgical (OSR) or endovascular (EVAR), Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm (AAA) repair. METHODS: In this Norwegian prospective multicentre study, 877 patients underwent preoperative screening for DM by HbA1c measurements from November 2017 to December 2020. Diabetes was defined as screening detected HbA1c ≥ 48 mmol/mol (6.5%) or previously diagnosed diabetes. The association of DM with in-hospital complications, length of stay, and 30-day mortality rate were evaluated using adjusted and unadjusted logistic regression models. RESULTS: The total prevalence of DM was 15% (95% CI 13%,17%), of which 25% of the DM cases (95% CI 18%,33%) were undiagnosed upon admission for AAA surgery. The OSR to EVAR ratio was 52% versus 48%, with similar distribution among DM patients, and no differences in the prevalence of known and undiagnosed DM in the EVAR versus the OSR group. Total 30-day mortality rate was 0.6% (5/877). Sixty-six organ-related complications occurred in 58 (7%) of the patients. DM was not statistically significantly associated with a higher risk of in-hospital organ-related complications (OR 1.23, 95% CI 0.57,2.39, p = 0.57), procedure-related complications (OR 1.48, 95% CI 0.79,2.63, p = 0.20), 30-day mortality (p = 0.09) or length of stay (HR 1.06, 95% CI 0.88,1.28, p = 0.54). According to post-hoc-analyses, organ-related complications were more frequent in patients with newly diagnosed DM (n = 32) than in non-DM patients (OR 4.92; 95% CI 1.53,14.3, p = 0.005). CONCLUSION: Twenty-five percent of all DM cases were undiagnosed at the time of AAA surgery. Based on post-hoc analyses, undiagnosed DM seems to be associated with an increased risk of organ related complications following AAA surgery. This study suggests universal DM screening in AAA patients to reduce the number of DM patients being undiagnosed and to improve proactive diabetes care in this population. The results from post-hoc analyses should be confirmed in future studies.
Asunto(s)
Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal , Biomarcadores , Diabetes Mellitus , Procedimientos Endovasculares , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Humanos , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/cirugía , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/mortalidad , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/diagnóstico por imagen , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/epidemiología , Masculino , Femenino , Anciano , Estudios Prospectivos , Prevalencia , Factores de Riesgo , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiología , Diabetes Mellitus/diagnóstico , Diabetes Mellitus/mortalidad , Noruega/epidemiología , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/mortalidad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/mortalidad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Biomarcadores/sangre , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/efectos adversos , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/mortalidad , Hemoglobina Glucada/metabolismo , Tiempo de Internación , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedades no Diagnosticadas/epidemiología , Enfermedades no Diagnosticadas/diagnóstico , Mortalidad HospitalariaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Emergency resuscitative thoracotomy (ERT) is a lifesaving procedure for select indications in severely injured patients. The main body of the literature stem from regions with a high prevalence of penetrating injuries, while data from European institutions remain scarce. We aimed to evaluate a decade of ERT in a Norwegian trauma centre. METHODS: A prospectively collected series from the institutional trauma registry of all consecutive trauma patients who had an ERT at Stavanger University Hospital (SUH) from 2006 to 2018. Data were extracted using both registry and electronic patient record (EPR) data, including injury profile, demographics and outcomes. Comparison of groups were done by descriptive statistics. RESULTS: A total of 26 ERTs were performed during the study period, of which 20 were men (75%) and 6 women (25%). Five patients (19%) survived to hospital discharge, of which 3 men and 2 women with a median age of 46 years (range 24-68). All survivors had thoracic injury as location of major injury (LOMI.). Of the five survivors, four suffered blunt injury and one patient penetrating injury. At one-year of follow-up of the survivors, three patients scored 8/8 on Glasgow outcome scale-extended, 1 patient scored 7/8 and one patient 5/8. CONCLUSION: In this study, ERT conferred good outcome with survival in one of every five procedures. Performing ERT in severely injured patients presenting in extremis appears to be justified even in low-volume centres and in blunt trauma.
Asunto(s)
Resucitación , Traumatismos Torácicos , Toracotomía , Heridas no Penetrantes , Heridas Penetrantes , Adulto , Anciano , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Noruega/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Traumatismos Torácicos/epidemiología , Traumatismos Torácicos/cirugía , Centros Traumatológicos , Heridas no Penetrantes/cirugía , Heridas Penetrantes/cirugía , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE/BACKGROUND: The objective was to observe for 1 year all patients in Norway operated on for symptomatic carotid stenosis with respect to (i) the time from the index event to surgery and neurological events during this time; (ii) the level in the healthcare system causing delay of surgical treatment; and (iii) the possible relationship between peri-operative use of platelet inhibitors and neurological events while awaiting surgery. METHODS: This was a prospective national multicentre study of a consecutive series of symptomatic patients. Patients were eligible for inclusion when referred for surgery. An index event was defined as the neurological event prompting contact with the healthcare system. All 15 departments in Norway performing carotid endarterectomy (CEA) participated. RESULTS: Three hundred and seventy one patients were eligible for inclusion between 1 April 2014 and 31 March 2015, and 368 patients (99.2%) were included. Fifty-four percent of the patients contacted their general practitioner on the day of the index event. Primary healthcare referred 84.2% of the patients to hospital on the same day as examined. In hospital median time from admission to referral for vascular surgery was 3 days. Median time between referral to the operating unit and actual CEA was 5 days. Overall, 61.7% of the patients were operated on within 2 weeks of the index event. Twelve patients (3.3%) suffered a new neurological event while awaiting surgery. The percentage of patients on dual antiplatelet therapy was lower (25.0%) in this group than among the other patients (62.6%) (p = .008). The combined 30 day mortality and stroke rate was 3.8%. CONCLUSION: This national study with almost complete inclusion and follow-up shows that the delays occur mainly at patient level and in hospital. The delay is associated with new neurological events. Dual antiplatelet therapy is associated with reduced risk of having a new neurological event before surgery.
Asunto(s)
Estenosis Carotídea , Endarterectomía Carotidea/métodos , Ataque Isquémico Transitorio , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/uso terapéutico , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Tiempo de Tratamiento , Anciano , Estenosis Carotídea/complicaciones , Estenosis Carotídea/diagnóstico , Estenosis Carotídea/epidemiología , Estenosis Carotídea/fisiopatología , Endarterectomía Carotidea/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Ataque Isquémico Transitorio/epidemiología , Ataque Isquémico Transitorio/etiología , Ataque Isquémico Transitorio/prevención & control , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Evaluación de Necesidades , Noruega/epidemiología , Estudios Prospectivos , Medición de Riesgo/métodos , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Accidente Cerebrovascular/epidemiología , Accidente Cerebrovascular/etiología , Accidente Cerebrovascular/prevención & control , Evaluación de Síntomas/estadística & datos numéricos , Tiempo de Tratamiento/normas , Tiempo de Tratamiento/estadística & datos numéricosAsunto(s)
Carcinoma/patología , Carcinoma/cirugía , Neoplasias del Recto/patología , Neoplasias del Recto/cirugía , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Metástasis de la Neoplasia , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia , Neoplasias Primarias Secundarias , Noruega , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: A registry-based analysis revealed imprecise informal one-tiered trauma team activation (TTA) in a primary trauma centre. A two-tiered TTA protocol was introduced and analysed to examine its impact on triage precision and resource utilization. METHODS: Interhospital transfers and patients admitted by non-healthcare personnel were excluded. Undertriage was defined as the fraction of major trauma victims (New Injury Severity Score over 15) admitted without TTA. Overtriage was the fraction of TTA without major trauma. RESULTS: Of 1812 patients, 768 had major trauma. Overall undertriage was reduced from 28·4 to 19·1 per cent (P < 0·001) after system revision. Overall overtriage increased from 61·5 to 71·6 per cent, whereas the mean number of skilled hours spent per overtriaged patient was reduced from 6·5 to 3·5 (P < 0·001) and the number of skilled hours spent per major trauma victim was reduced from 7·4 to 7·1 (P < 0·001). Increasing age increased risk for undertriage and decreased risk for overtriage. Falls increased risk for undertriage and decreased risk for overtriage, whereas motor vehicle-related accidents showed the opposite effects. Patients triaged to a prehospital response involving an anaesthetist had less chance of both undertriage and overtriage. CONCLUSION: A two-tiered TTA protocol was associated with reduced undertriage and increased overtriage, while trauma team resource consumption was reduced. REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT00876564 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov).
Asunto(s)
Protocolos Clínicos/normas , Grupo de Atención al Paciente/normas , Triaje/normas , Heridas y Lesiones/terapia , Adulto , Anestesiología/organización & administración , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia/organización & administración , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Noruega , Oportunidad Relativa , Grupo de Atención al Paciente/organización & administración , Estudios Prospectivos , Centros Traumatológicos/organización & administración , Centros Traumatológicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Triaje/organización & administración , Recursos Humanos , Heridas y Lesiones/mortalidad , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
AIM: Our aim was to compare liver resection for colorectal metastases in a non-referral, small volume unit with a dedicated staff, with results from larger units. METHODS: Thirty patients (15 men and 15 women) with a median age of 64years (range 29-78) underwent hepatic resection during a 5-year period from 1997 to 2003 in a teaching hospital in western Norway. RESULTS: Sixty-three percent (19/30) of the colorectal tumours were Dukes stage C (n=19) and CEA was increased in seven patients (23%), of which four (13%) had values above 50microg/l. The metastases were synchronous with the colorectal tumours in 11 patients (37%). Non-anatomical (wedge) resections were the dominant type of surgeries and the resection margins were clear in all patients. A 77-year-old man (3%) died of MOF after right hemihepatectomy. Morbidity was encountered in eight other patients (28%). In 22 patients (76%) with recurrent disease, metastases first appeared in the liver in 18 (82%) of these patients. Seven patients (23%) have had resections for recurrences. Mean time to recurrence was 20months (range 3-87). The actuarial 5-year survival rate was 42%. Six patients (20%) are currently disease free. CONCLUSION: Although our unit has treated a small number of patients compared with specialized units elsewhere, the survival rate, as well as morbidity and mortality, were comparable. However, 62% have had recurrent liver disease and this may suggest a role for neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy in selected cases.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales/cirugía , Neoplasias Hepáticas/cirugía , Adulto , Anciano , Neoplasias Colorrectales/patología , Femenino , Hepatectomía , Hospitales de Enseñanza/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/secundario , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , NoruegaAsunto(s)
Hospitales/estadística & datos numéricos , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Servicios Centralizados de Hospital/organización & administración , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/organización & administración , Humanos , Neoplasias/cirugía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/mortalidad , Calidad de la Atención de SaludRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Resuscitative emergency thoracotomy (ET) is of value in selected (penetrating) trauma patients. Current survival-estimates and recommended guidelines are based on data from the United States. However, reports from European trauma centres are lacking. We report the current experience from a Scandinavian trauma hospital. METHODS: Identification of all consecutive ETs performed during a 5-year period. Data on demographics, and injury severity score (ISS), mechanism and location were recorded. Physiological status on admission (revised trauma score, RTS) and probability of survival (Ps) were calculated. Signs of life (SOL) and need for closed-chest cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CC-CPR) were recorded through the post-injury phase. RESULTS: Ten patients underwent ET with no survivors. The annual incidence of ET was 0.7 per 100,000 inhabitants during the study period, with an increasing trend during the last years (r=0.74, p=0.014). ETs were performed in 0.7% of all trauma admissions, and in 2.5% of all severely injured patients (ISS>or=16). Blunt mechanism dominated; only three had penetrating injuries. Most frequent location of major injury was "multiple" (n=4) and "thoracic" (n=4). The male to female ratio was 7:3. Median age was 51 years (range 21-77). Median ISS was 34.5 (range 26-75), indicating severely injured patients, with seriously deranged physiology (median RTS of 0.0, range 0-6.1) with poor chance of survival (median Ps of 4.4%, range 0-89.5%). Males had significantly lower RTS and Ps (p=0.007 and 0.03, respectively) than females. Eight patients had signs of life at some time post-injury, but only four in the emergency room. Six patients had both pre- and in-hospital CC-CPR. Four patients had additional surgery to ET. Two possible preventable deaths were identified (Ps) of 51 and 89%), one in a third trimester pregnancy. CONCLUSION: Emergency thoracotomy is a rarely performed procedure in a rather busy Scandinavian trauma hospital, and outcome is dismal. Reevaluation of our decision-making process concerning the use of emergency thoracotomy is needed. How survival data and clinical experience in Europe compare to current figures from North America deserves further attention.
Asunto(s)
Resucitación/métodos , Toracotomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Heridas no Penetrantes/cirugía , Heridas Penetrantes/cirugía , Adulto , Anciano , Urgencias Médicas , Femenino , Humanos , Puntaje de Gravedad del Traumatismo , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Noruega , Pronóstico , Estudios Prospectivos , Análisis de Supervivencia , Centros Traumatológicos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Heridas por Arma de Fuego/cirugíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To examine the risk of high-flow type II endoleak following endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm with aortocaval fistula. DESIGN: Case reports. SUBJECTS: Two patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms with aortocaval fistula. METHODS: Both patients had an endovascular repair of their aortic aneurysms. RESULTS: The aneurysms were successfully treated in both patients, without any endoleak on completion angiography. Apart from a transient type II lumbar endoleak in one of the patients, no endoleak was found after 3 and 12 month follow-up. Seven other cases have been published, reporting one type II and one type Ic endoleak. CONCLUSION: We found no evidence that endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm with aortocaval fistula is associated with a higher incidence of persistent endoleak.
Asunto(s)
Aorta Abdominal/diagnóstico por imagen , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/cirugía , Fístula Arteriovenosa/etiología , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/métodos , Vena Cava Inferior/diagnóstico por imagen , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Angiografía , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/complicaciones , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/diagnóstico por imagen , Fístula Arteriovenosa/diagnóstico por imagen , Fístula Arteriovenosa/cirugía , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos XRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Acute cholecystitis carries a higher risk of subsequent gallstone related events than symptomatic, non-complicated disease. However, it is largely unknown to what extent non-operative treatment will affect the patient's well-being as no trial has studied the possible consequences on pain and quality of life. Our aim was to study in a randomized trial how observational treatment (watchful waiting) compared to cholecystectomy. METHODS: Sixty-four patients with acute cholecystitis were randomized to observation or cholecystectomy. All gallstone related events were registered and patients answered questionnaires on quality of life (PGWB and NHP) and pain (Pain score and VAPS) at randomization and at 6, 12 and 60 months later. RESULTS: Patients were followed-up for a median of 67 months. Ten of 33 patients (30%, 95% CI 15%-46%) patients randomized to observation and 27 of 31 (87%, 95% CI 75 %- 99%) of patients randomized to operation had a cholecystectomy. Twelve of 33 (36%, 95% CI 20%-53%) patients in the observation group had a gallstone related event compared to 6 of 31 (19%, 95% CI 5%-33%) patients in the operation group, but the difference was not significant. When patients were grouped according to randomization or actual operative outcome (+/- cholecystectomy), we did not find any significant differences in pain or quality of life measurements. CONCLUSION: Although conservative treatment of AC carried a certain but not significantly increased risk of subsequent gallstone related events, this did not influence the symptomatic outcome as assessed by quality of life and pain measurements. Thus, we argue that conservative (non-operative) treatment and observation of AC is an acceptable option and should at least be considered in elderly and frail patients.
Asunto(s)
Colecistitis Aguda/terapia , Dolor/etiología , Calidad de Vida , Adulto , Anciano , Colecistectomía , Colecistitis Aguda/complicaciones , Colecistitis Aguda/cirugía , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Cuidados Posoperatorios , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Cholecystectomy is intended to relieve symptoms of gallstones, but unfortunately some patients will experience postcholecystectomy symptoms, including pain. There is limited information in the literature on gallstone-related pain and its influence on quality of life. The aim of this study was to examine how pain and quality of life in patients with symptomatic, uncomplicated gallbladder stones were affected by observation of their condition compared with removal of the gallbladder. METHODS: One-hundred and thirty-seven patients were randomized to observation (watchful waiting; n = 69) or cholecystectomy (n = 68) and answered questionnaires on pain, quality of life (PGWB index and NHP Part II) at randomization and fixed intervals (6, 12 and 60 months). All gallstone-related events (hospital admission for pain, complications of gallstone disease and cholecystectomy) and crossover between treatment groups were recorded. RESULTS: Of patients randomized to observation, 35 of 69 patients (51%) eventually underwent a cholecystectomy. Significant improvements in quality of life and pain scores were detected regardless of surgical treatment. Patients that subsequently experienced gallstone-related events had significantly higher pain scores at randomization than patients that did not experience any subsequent events, and this difference was maintained throughout follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Unexpectedly, in the majority of patients symptoms did abate without any significant differences between groups in pain and quality of life. Patients that had high intensity and frequency of pain at randomization had a higher risk of experiencing subsequent events.
Asunto(s)
Dolor Abdominal/etiología , Colecistectomía , Cálculos Biliares/complicaciones , Cálculos Biliares/terapia , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Calidad de Vida , Adulto , Anciano , Estudios Cruzados , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Observación , Dimensión del Dolor , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The aim of the present study was to compare the risk of observation versus that of cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis in patients randomly allocated to delayed operation or conservative treatment. METHODS: One-hundred-and-eighty patients were considered for participation in the study; 71 were excluded according to predefined criteria and 45 did not join for other reasons. The remaining 64 patients were randomized to cholecystectomy (n = 31) or observation (n = 33). Randomized patients were contacted regularly and followed up for a median of 67 months. All gallstone-related hospital contacts were registered in both randomized and excluded patients. RESULTS: Gallstone-related complications or emergency admissions for pain occurred in six patients in the operation group (19%; 95% CI 5%-33%) and in 12 patients (36%; 9% CI 20%-53%) in the observation group. Twenty-seven of 31 patients randomized to cholecystectomy had a cholecystectomy at a median of 3.6 months after randomization, and, of these, 3 (11%; 95% CI 0%-23%) suffered a major and 7 (26%; 95% CI 9%-42%) a minor complication. Ten patients randomized to observation later had their gallbladders removed, 1 (10%; 95% CI 0%-29%) patient had a major and 1 (10%; 95% CI 0%-29%) a minor complication. We found no mortality after cholecystectomy. CONCLUSIONS: We found a certain risk of subsequent gallstone-related events following conservative treatment of acute cholecystitis, but the data also show that cholecystectomy should not necessarily be compulsory after acute cholecystitis.
Asunto(s)
Colecistectomía , Colecistitis/cirugía , Enfermedad Aguda , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Colecistitis/diagnóstico , Colecistitis/terapia , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Cholecystectomy has been recognized as the treatment of choice for symptomatic gallbladder stone disease. Not all patients are cured by an operation and the reason for having the gallbladder removed may rest on common practice rather than evidence-based medicine. The aim was to compare cholecystectomy with observation (watchful waiting) in patients with uncomplicated symptomatic GBS disease. Three-hundred-and-thirty-eight patients were considered for participation in the study; 45 patients were excluded according to predefined criteria and 156 did not join for other reasons. The remaining 137 were randomized to cholecystectomy (n = 68) or non-operative, expectant treatment (n = 69). METHODS: Randomized patients were contacted regularly and followed for a median of 67 months. All gallstone-related hospital contacts were registered in both randomized and excluded patients. RESULTS: Eight of the patients randomized to cholecystectomy did not undergo operation, while 35 of the patients randomized to observation later had their gallbladders removed. The cumulative risk of having a cholecystectomy seemed to level off after 4 years. Gallstone-related complications occurred in 3 patients in the observation group, 1 in the operation group and 5 of 201 excluded patients. After cholecystectomy, 16 of 222 patients had a major complication and 10 a minor. CONCLUSIONS: We found that non-operative expectant treatment carries a low risk of complications. Patients should be informed that watchful waiting is a safe option.
Asunto(s)
Colecistectomía/métodos , Colelitiasis/cirugía , Adulto , Anciano , Colelitiasis/complicaciones , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Observación , Dimensión del Dolor , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Estudios Prospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To describe the outcome after acute biliary pancreatitis in patients treated during the acute attack by endoscopic sphincterotomy without cholecystectomy. DESIGN: Prospective observational study. SETTING: University hospital, Norway. SUBJECTS: 130 patients with gallstones and acute pancreatitis. In 62 patients with common bile duct stones the bile duct was cleared by sphincterotomy and stone extraction. The remaining 68 patients had prophylactic sphincterotomy. Cholecystectomy was not planned later. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Incidence of recurrent acute pancreatitis and need for cholecystectomy. RESULTS: 21 patients were dead or not available for the follow-up. Consequently 109 patients were followed-up for a median of 39 months (range 23-62). One patient had recurrent pancreatitis. 20 patients had a cholecystectomy later for symptoms related to gallstone disease. Of the rest, 25 patients had moderate or mild gallstone-related symptoms. There was no difference in gallstone-related symptoms between those who had had stones in the bile duct and those who had not. 63 patients had no symptoms related to gallstones. CONCLUSION: Endoscopic sphincterotomy during or immediately after acute gallstone pancreatitis resulted in half the patients being free of symptoms during the next three years.