RESUMEN
With the help of a routine clinical case, we highlighted the difference between two of the best asthma guidelines available at the time regarding therapeutic suggestions for the so-called "third step" for school-age asthmatic children. We have analyzed the scientific evidence that each of the two guidelines brings to support their position. Finally, we have motivatedly solved the clinical scenario. However, the question of disagreement between two guidelines remains unresolved. This can lead to unjustified differences in the management of schoolchildren with persistent asthma
No disponible
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Masculino , Niño , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto/normas , Asma/tratamiento farmacológico , Antiasmáticos/uso terapéutico , Agonistas de Receptores Adrenérgicos beta 2/uso terapéutico , Antagonistas de Leucotrieno/uso terapéutico , Corticoesteroides/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
With the help of a routine clinical case about delayed urticaria induced by drug, we have analyzed the scientific societies reports published during the last 5 years on this topic. We highlighted the differences between the EAACI consensus and documents on drug allergy, commenting their positions and some of their definitions on delayed urticaria. However, the question of disagreement between definitions of delayed urticaria can generate confusion. It would be beneficial to have more and "official" clearness about this topic because of its important clinical application to our patients
No disponible