RESUMEN

Objetivos Evaluar la frecuencia de las admisiones en los servicios de urgencias (ASU) por ambulatory care sensitive conditions (ACSC) y no-ACSC de personas que viven en residencias; describir y comparar sus características, y analizar los costes asociados. Método Este estudio multicéntrico, retrospectivo y observacional evaluó 2.444ASU de personas ≥65 años que viven en residencias en 5 servicios de urgencias de Cataluña por ACSC y no-ACSC, en 2017. Se recogieron variables sociodemográficas, estado funcional y cognitivo, e información sobre diagnóstico y hospitalización. Se evaluaron los costes relacionados con ACSC-ASU y se efectuó un análisis de sensibilidad utilizando diferentes supuestos de disminución de ingresos por ACSC. Resultados La media de edad de la muestra del estudio fue de 85,9 años (desviación estándar: 7,2 años). La frecuencia de ACSC-ASU y no-ACSC-ASU fue del 56,6 y el 43,4%, respectivamente. El 56,6 y el 78% presentaban dependencia severa y deterioro cognitivo, respectivamente, sin observarse diferencias entre los 2 grupos. Las 3 ACSC más frecuentes fueron caídas/traumatismos (13,8%), enfermedad pulmonar obstructiva crónica/asma (11,4%) e infección urinaria (7,4%). El coste medio por ACSC-ASU fue de 1.408,24€. Suponiendo una reducción del 60% de las ACSC-ASU, el ahorro de costes estimado sería de 1,2 millones de euros. Conclusiones Las admisiones en urgencias por ACSC procedentes de entornos residenciales suponen un impacto significativo tanto en la frecuencia como en los costes. La disminución de estas enfermedades mediante la aplicación de intervenciones específicas podría redirigir los costes evitados hacia la mejora del apoyo asistencial en los entornos residenciales (AU)

Objectives To assess the frequency of emergency department admissions (EDAs) for ambulatory care sensitive conditions (ACSC) and non-ACSC among older adults living in care homes (CH), to describe and compare their demographic and clinical characteristics, the outcomes of the hospitalization process and the associated costs. Method This multicenter, retrospective and observational study evaluated 2444 EDAs of older adults ≥65 years old living in care homes in five emergency departments in Catalonia (Spain) by ACSC and non-ACSC, in 2017. Sociodemographic variables, prior functional and cognitive status, and information on diagnosis and hospitalization were collected. Additionally, the costs related with the EDAs were calculated, as well as a sensitivity analysis using different assumptions of decreased admissions due to ACSC Results A total of 2444 ED admissions were analyzed. The patients’ mean (SD) age was 85.9 (7.2) years. The frequency of ACSC-EDA and non-ACSC-EDA was 56.6% and 43.4%, respectively. Severe dependency and cognitive impairment were present in 56.6% and 78%, respectively, with no differences between the two groups. The three most frequent ACSC were falls/trauma (13.8%), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease/asthma (11.4%) and urinary tract infection (7.4%). The average cost per ACSC-EDA was €1408.24. Assuming a 60% reduction of ACSC-EDA, the estimated cost savings would be €1.2 million. Conclusions Emergency admissions for ACSC from care homes have a significant impact on both frequency and costs. Reducing these conditions through targeted interventions could redirect the avoided costs toward improving care support in residential settings (AU)

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To assess the frequency of emergency department admissions (EDA) for ambulatory care sensitive conditions (ACSC) and non-ACSC among older adults living in care homes (CH), to describe and compare their demographic and clinical characteristics, the outcomes of the hospitalisation process and the associated costs. METHOD: This multicenter, retrospective and observational study evaluated 2444 EDAs of older adults ≥ 65 years old living in care homes in 5 emergency departments in Catalonia (Spain) by ACSC and non-ACSC, in 2017. Sociodemographic variables, prior functional and cognitive status, and information on diagnosis and hospitalisation were collected. Additionally, the costs related with the EDAs were calculated, as well as a sensitivity analysis using different assumptions of decreased admissions due to ACSC. RESULTS: A total of 2444 ED admissions were analysed. The patients' mean (SD) age was 85.9 (7.2) years. The frequency of ACSC-EDA and non-ACSC-EDA was 56.6% and 43.4%, respectively. Severe dependency and cognitive impairment were present in 56.6% and 78%, respectively, with no differences between the two groups. The three most frequent ACSC were falls/trauma (13.8%), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease/asthma (11.4%) and urinary tract infection (7.4%). The average cost per ACSC-EDA was є1,408.24. Assuming a 60% reduction of ACSC-EDA, the estimated cost savings would be є1.2 million. CONCLUSIONS: Emergency admissions for ACSC from care homes have a significant impact on both frequency and costs. Reducing these conditions through targeted interventions could redirect the avoided costs towards improving care support in residential settings.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Assess the 3D/3D+ rapid geriatric assessment tool for the early detection of frailty, its usefulness to identify the effects of the acute process on the functional, physical, cognitive and socioenvironmental dimensions, as well as the medications that may have triggered the patient's reason for visit. Finally, assess the usefulness of 3D/3D+ together with the clinical diagnosis to adequate care resource at discharge from the emergency department (ED). METHOD: Retrospective observational cohort study. Patients ≥75 years old, with clinical complexity visited at the ED were included. Basal frailty status was assessed using 3D (basal component), and the multidimensional impact of the acute process using 3D+ (current component). The main dependent variable was adequacy of the care resource at ED discharge. RESULTS: 278 patients were included, mean age 86 years (interquartile range: 83-90), 59.7% were women. According to the basal component (3D), 83.1% (95%CI: 78.2-87.3) presented some degree of frailty. The current component (3D+) was altered in 60.1% (95%CI: 54.1-65.9). The adequacy of ED discharge was correct in 96.4% (95%CI: 93.0-98.0). One out of 4patients was admitted to a medicine ward. CONCLUSIONS: 3D/3D+ facilitates an optimal model of emergency care adapted to patients ≥ 75 years old treated in EDs. It stratifies the level of frailty (3D), detects the severity of patients' acute problems (3D+) and contributes to decision-making regarding the most appropriate care resource at ED discharge.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Objetivo: Evaluar la herramienta de valoración geriátrica rápida 3D/3D+como cribado precoz de fragilidad; su utilidad para identificar la repercusión del proceso agudo en las dimensiones funcional, cognitiva, social y los posibles fármacos desencadenantes del motivo de consulta. Por último, la utilidad de las 3D/3D+junto al diagnóstico clínico para adecuar el recurso asistencial al alta del servicio de Urgencias hospitalario (SUH).Método: Estudio observacional de cohortes retrospectivo. Se incluyó a los pacientes de 75 o más años con complejidad clínica que fueron atendidos en el área médica del SUH. Se valoró el grado de fragilidad basal mediante las 3D (componente basal) y la repercusión multidimensional debida al proceso agudo mediante las 3D+(componente actual). La variable dependiente principal fue la adecuación del recurso asistencial al alta del SUH.Resultados: Se incluyó a 278 pacientes de edad media 86 años (rango intercuartil: 83-90) y 59,7% de mujeres. Según el componente basal (3D), el 83,1% (IC del 95%: 78,2-87,3) presentaba algún grado de fragilidad. El componente actual (3D+) estaba alterado en el 60,1% (IC del 95%: 54,1-65,9). La adecuación al alta del SUH fue correcta en un 96,4% (IC del 95%: 93,0-98,0). Uno de cada 4pacientes ingresó en hospitalización convencional.Conclusiones: Las 3D/3D+facilita un modelo óptimo de atención urgente adaptada a los pacientes de 75 o más años atendidos en los SUH. Estratifica el grado fragilidad (3D), detecta la gravedad debido al problema agudo por el que paciente consulta (3D+) y contribuye a la toma de decisiones sobre el recurso asistencial más apropiado al alta del SUH. (AU)

Objective: Assess the 3D/3D+ rapid geriatric assessment tool for the early detection of frailty, its usefulness to identify the effects of the acute process on the functional, physical, cognitive and socioenvironmental dimensions, as well as the medications that may have triggered the patient's reason for visit. Finally, assess the usefulness of 3D/3D+ together with the clinical diagnosis to adequate care resource at discharge from the emergency department (ED).Method: Retrospective observational cohort study. Patients ≥75 years old, with clinical complexity visited at the ED were included. Basal frailty status was assessed using 3D (basal component), and the multidimensional impact of the acute process using 3D+ (current component). The main dependent variable was adequacy of the care resource at ED discharge.Results: 278 patients were included, mean age 86 years (interquartile range: 83–90), 59.7% were women. According to the basal component (3D), 83.1% (95%CI: 78.2–87.3) presented some degree of frailty. The current component (3D+) was altered in 60.1% (95%CI: 54.1–65.9). The adequacy of ED discharge was correct in 96.4% (95%CI: 93.0–98.0). One out of 4patients was admitted to a medicine ward.Conclusions: 3D/3D+ facilitates an optimal model of emergency care adapted to patients ≥ 75 years old treated in EDs. It stratifies the level of frailty (3D), detects the severity of patients’ acute problems (3D+) and contributes to decision-making regarding the most appropriate care resource at ED discharge. (AU)

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

No disponible

Asunto(s)