RESUMEN

Objectives: To determine the clinical profile, according to the history of hypertension, the risk of developing hypertension, current antihypertensive treatment and BP control rates in patients with hypertension from the IBERICAN cohort. Methods: IBERICAN is an ongoing prospective cohort study, whose primary objective is to determine the frequency, incidence, and distribution of CVRF in the adult Spanish population seen in primary care settings. This analysis shows the baseline clinical characteristics of patients with hypertension. Adequate BP control was defined as BP <140/90 mmHg according to 2013 ESH/ESC guidelines. Results: A total of 8,066 patients were consecutively included, of whom 3,860 (48.0%) had hypertension. These patients were older (65.8 ± 10.9 vs. 51.6 ± 14.7 years; p < 0.001), had more cardiovascular risk factors, target organ damage and cardiovascular disease (CVD) in comparison with those without hypertension. The risk of hypertension increased with the presence of associated CV risk factors and comorbidities, particularly diabetes, obesity and the metabolic syndrome, and decreased with the intensity of physical activity. Regarding antihypertensive treatments, 6.1% of patients did not take any medication, 38.8% were taking one antihypertensive drug, 35.5% two drugs, and 19.6% three or more antihypertensive drugs. Overall, 58.3% achieved BP goals <140/90 mmHg. A greater probability of BP control was observed with increasing age of patients and the greater number of antihypertensive drugs. Blood pressure control was lower in hypertensive patients with diabetes, obesity, the metabolic syndrome, increased urinary albumin excretion, higher pulse pressure, and lack of antihypertensive treatment. Conclusions: About half of patients attended in primary care settings have hypertension in Spain. Patients with hypertension have a worse CV clinical profile than non-hypertensive patients, with greater association of CVRF and CVD. Around four out of ten patients do not achieve the recommended BP goals, and higher use of combination therapies is associated with a better BP control.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Elderly patients can be particularly susceptible to the adverse effects of excessive blood pressure (BP) lowering by antihypertensive treatment. The identification of hypotension is thus especially important. Ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) is a more accurate technique than office for classifying BP status. This study examined the prevalence of hypotension and associated demographic and clinical factors among very old treated hypertensive patients undergoing ABPM. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Cross-sectional study in which 5066 patients aged 80 years and older with treated hypertension drawn from the Spanish ABPM Registry were included. MEASUREMENTS: Office BP and 24-hour ambulatory BP were determined using validated devices under standardized conditions. Based on previous studies, hypotension was defined as systolic/diastolic BP <110 and/or 70 mmHg with office measurement, <105 and/or 65 mmHg with daytime ABPM, <90 and/or 50 mmHg with nighttime ABPM, and <100 and/or 60 mmHg with 24-hour ABPM. RESULTS: Participants' mean age was 83.2 ± 3.1 years (64.4% women). Overall, 22.8% of patients had office hypotension, 33.7% daytime hypotension, 9.2% nighttime hypotension, and 20.5% 24-hour ABPM hypotension. Low diastolic BP values were responsible for 90% of cases of hypotension. In addition, 59.1% of the cases of hypotension detected by daytime ABPM did not correspond to hypotension according to office BP. The variables independently associated with office and ABPM hypotension were diabetes, coronary heart disease, and a higher number of antihypertensive medications. CONCLUSIONS: One in 3 very elderly treated hypertensive patients attended in usual clinical practice were potentially at risk of having hypotension according to daytime ABPM. More than half of them had masked hypotension; that is, they were not identified if relying on office BP alone. Thus, ABPM could be especially helpful for identifying ambulatory hypotension and avoiding overtreatment, in particular, in patients with diabetes, heart disease, or on antihypertensive polytherapy.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the impact of orthostatic hypotension (OH) and orthostatic hypertension (OHT) on all-cause mortality. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of, 1176 adults from the community over 18 years of age were included in this ambispective study. The mean follow-up was 9.4 years. OH and OHT were defined as a decrease or an increase, respectively, in systolic blood pressure (BP) of at least 20 mmHg and/or diastolic BP of at least 10 mmHg from sitting to standing position at 1 and/or 3 min after standing. The impact of systolic or diastolic OH and systolic or diastolic OHT at 1 and 3 min after standing was also analyzed separately. RESULTS: In total, 135 individuals died during the follow-up. Neither OH [hazard ratio (HR) 1.23; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.72-2.10] nor OHT (HR 0.90; 95% CI: 0.59-1.38) was associated with all-cause mortality in the adjusted models. In contrast, systolic OHT at 3 min (HR 2.31; 95% CI: 1.14-4.68) was independently associated with global mortality. CONCLUSION: Systolic OHT at 3 min is associated with all-cause mortality. The determination of this parameter could add valuable prognostic information during the routine examination of patients.

Asunto(s)