RESUMEN
Introduction Allergic rhinitis is one of the most common diseases in the world. It affects all people irrespective of age, sex and race. Allergic rhinitis leads to the development of social and interpersonal problems and loss of productivity which in turn causes depression. The depression was an underestimated iceberg phenomenon in allergic rhinitis patients. Objective The study evaluates the association between the severity of allergic rhinitis and the level of depression in patients attending tertiary care hospitals in south India. Methodology This cross-sectional study was conducted among 250 patients with allergic rhinitis. All the patients were subjected to the semi-structured questionnaire. And the severity of allergic rhinitis has been made based on the allergic rhinitis, and its impact on asthma classification and depression has been diagnosed and classified based on the Hamilton depression rating scale. And the association between allergic rhinitis and depression has been evaluated with the chi-square test. Results Two hundred fifty patients participated in the study, with a mean age of 33+/-2. Surprisingly the prevalence of depression among the allergic rhinitis patient was 88%. Most of them suffered from mild depression based on the Hamilton depression rating scale. A significant association was seen among allergic patients with age, gender, smoking status, locality, socioeconomic status, and co-morbidities. And the study shows the severity of allergic rhinitis is directly related to the severity of depression with a significant association. Conclusion Depression is one of the underestimated and under-treated problems in today's world. This study concludes that the severity of allergic rhinitis directly and significantly correlates with the severity of depression. The prevalence and intensity of depression should be evaluated and appropriately treated in patients with allergic rhinitis to improve the quality of life.
RESUMEN
The presence of a tooth inside the nasal cavity is a rare clinical entity. The exact pathophysiology is not clear and most of the times, these patients present with non-specific symptoms. We encountered a 51-year-old male with symptoms of bilateral recurrent nasal obstruction and nasal discharge of 10 years' duration. Anterior rhinoscopy and diagnostic nasal endoscopy revealed a greyish white hard gritty mass covered with mucopurulent discharge in the floor of left nasal cavity and a mucosal covered bulge was noted in the floor of right nasal cavity. CT showed 2 hyperintense lesions in the maxilla reaching the floor of both nasal cavities. Diagnosis of supernumerary teeth was made and treated accordingly. Although the presence of tooth has been reported in ovaries, maxilla, maxillary sinus, mandibular condyle, mediastinum, this is the rare case reported with supernumerary teeth in both nasal cavities.
RESUMEN
Introduction In the current otorhinolaryngology practice, technology has always been an essential part. Therefore, diagnostic nasal endoscopy (DNE) has become a vital examination in today's practice. In order to visualize the nasal cavity in a systematic manner without any discomfort to both patient and doctor, the nose should be well anesthetized and decongested. Objective The study is to compare and evaluate the efficacy of 4% lignocaine-oxymetazoline cotton pledget packing versus topical sprays in the preparation of nasal cavities for DNE. Methodology The prospective, randomized, double-blind study was conducted among 246 patients and was divided into two groups. In the first group, the nose was packed with cotton pledgets containing 4% lignocaine-oxymetazoline and another group with 4% lignocaine-oxymetazoline spray. Following DNE, patients and surgeons were questioned on a pre-formed questionnaire to evaluate their experience during the procedure. Results It was observed that the time taken for the pre-endoscopic preparation of the packing group was more than the spray group. A total of 91.9% of the spray group had pain during the pre-endoscopic preparation and more burning and tingling sensation than in the nasal pack (75.6%). A total of 69.9% of the patients among the spray group participants compared to 32.5% of the packing group patients experienced more throat discomfort. In addition, 12% of the packing group had mucosal bleeding during the preparation. A total of 32.5% of the spray group experienced severe pain when compared to 12.2% of the packing group during the endoscopic procedure. Most of the participants from both groups had difficulty visualizing the superior turbinate and sphenoethmoidal recess during the procedure. There was a significant difference seen between both the groups with respect to pain during the pre-endoscopic procedure (p=0.0005), burning/tingling sensation (p<0.0001), throat pain (<0.0001), mucosal bleed (p=0.0003), pain during the procedure (p=0.0001), and discomfort after the procedure (p<0.0001). Conclusion Both methods of nasal preparation have merits and demerits in terms of discomfort, pain, and visualization of structures. Still, the packing of the nasal cavity with cotton pledgets is better when compared to spraying with 4% lignocaine-oxymetazoline. However, 4% lignocaine-oxymetazoline spray can be used during an emergency situation and with sensitive patients.
RESUMEN
Abstract Introduction In the current era, the major indication for septoplasty is nasal obstruction due to deviated nasal septum (DNS). Even though septoplasty is a commonly performed surgery, its effectiveness in relieving nasal obstruction in DNS has not been proven. Objective The present study involved the measurement of both objective (nasal patency) and subjective (quality of life measures) outcome measures for the evaluation of the efficacy of septoplasty as compared with medical management. Methods Patients with DNS presenting with nasal obstruction were included and randomized into a septoplasty group or into a nonsurgical management group, with 70 patients in each group. The improvement in nasal obstruction was assessed subjectively by the visual analogue scale (VAS), and the sino-nasal outcome test-22 (SNOT-22) and the nasal obstruction symptom evaluation (NOSE) questionnaires and was measured objectively by assessment of nasal patency by peak nasal inspiratory flow (PNIF) at 0, 1, 3, and 6 months of treatment in both groups. Results The average VAS, SNOT-22 and NOSE scores for the septoplasty versus the nonsurgical group before treatment were 6.28 versus 6.0, 19.5 versus 15, and 14 versus 12, respectively, and at 6 months post-treatment, the scores were 2.9 versus 5.26, 10 versus 12, and 8 versus 10 (p= 0.001), respectively. The average PNIF scores at 0 and 6 months were 60/50 l/min and 70/60 l/min, respectively, in the septoplasty group (p= 0.001); the scores at 0 and 6 months in the nonsurgical management group were 60/60 l/min and 70/70 l/min, respectively (p= 0.001). Conclusion Surgical correction of DNS by septoplasty improves nasal obstruction better than nonsurgical management at 6 months postsurgery.
RESUMEN
Introduction In the current era, the major indication for septoplasty is nasal obstruction due to deviated nasal septum (DNS). Even though septoplasty is a commonly performed surgery, its effectiveness in relieving nasal obstruction in DNS has not been proven. Objective The present study involved the measurement of both objective (nasal patency) and subjective (quality of life measures) outcome measures for the evaluation of the efficacy of septoplasty as compared with medical management. Methods Patients with DNS presenting with nasal obstruction were included and randomized into a septoplasty group or into a nonsurgical management group, with 70 patients in each group. The improvement in nasal obstruction was assessed subjectively by the visual analogue scale (VAS), and the sino-nasal outcome test-22 (SNOT-22) and the nasal obstruction symptom evaluation (NOSE) questionnaires and was measured objectively by assessment of nasal patency by peak nasal inspiratory flow (PNIF) at 0, 1, 3, and 6 months of treatment in both groups. Results The average VAS, SNOT-22 and NOSE scores for the septoplasty versus the nonsurgical group before treatment were 6.28 versus 6.0, 19.5 versus 15, and 14 versus 12, respectively, and at 6 months post-treatment, the scores were 2.9 versus 5.26, 10 versus 12, and 8 versus 10 ( p = 0.001), respectively. The average PNIF scores at 0 and 6 months were 60/50 l/min and 70/60 l/min, respectively, in the septoplasty group ( p = 0.001); the scores at 0 and 6 months in the nonsurgical management group were 60/60 l/min and 70/70 l/min, respectively ( p = 0.001). Conclusion Surgical correction of DNS by septoplasty improves nasal obstruction better than nonsurgical management at 6 months postsurgery.
RESUMEN
Aim: This study explored the knowledge, attitude and practices (KAP) of higher education students towards COVID-19. In addition, this study analysed the association of socio-demographic variables with KAP apart from finding the relationship between KAP. Subject and methods: This is a cross-sectional study conducted in India. Study participants were selected using a convenient sampling method from various higher educational institutions across 22 states in India. Data was collected using self-administered close-ended questionnaires via Google forms. The data were analysed using frequencies and percentage for descriptive purposes. A chi-square test was used to determine the association between groups, and correlation analysis was used to illustrate the significant relationship between KAP. Results: The majority, that is, 65.5% of students possess a high level of knowledge about the disease. It was noteworthy that 71.0% of them had a positive attitude towards COVID-19 and 66.7% of them exhibited desirable practices to mitigate COVID-19. Furthermore, the results showed a significant association between KAP and some of the socio-demographic variables studied. Social media emerged as a vital source of information regarding COVID-19 for the majority (81.0%) of students. Also, a strong significant positive correlation was observed between KAP variables. Conclusion: One-fourth of the students demonstrated only low and moderate levels of knowledge, negative attitude and undesirable practices in preventing COVID-19. The implications suggesting various approaches to enhance KAP to moderate the spread of COVID-19 among the students were recommended to aid the higher educational institutions.
RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: In the diagnosis of chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS), computed tomography (CT) of the nose and paranasal sinuses (PNS) remains the gold standard investigation. Though the diagnostic nasal endoscopy (DNE) is an equally effective and easily available investigation for diagnosis of CRS, its reliability and clinical significance to that of patient's symptoms have to be proven. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to determine the correlations between the symptom severity score, radiological score, and the endoscopic score in the diagnosis of CRS. Methods: This prospective observational study included 70 patients with CRS. It was conducted in a tertiary care institute from January 2019 to June 2020. All patients were subjected to DNE and CT nose and PNS. Symptom score was assessed using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score of 0-10. DNE and CT scores were calculated using the Lund-Kennedy endoscopic scoring system and the Lund-Mackay CT scoring system, respectively. The correlation between these scores were done using Pearson's correlation coefficient (p-value). RESULTS: The mean and standard deviation of the symptom score by VAS was 7 ± 1.7; the Lund-Kennedy score was 7.6 ± 2.3, and the Lund-Mackay score was 14.3 ± 6.5, respectively. The symptom score had moderate correlation with the Lund-Kennedy Score (r = 0.643, p < 0.001) and high degree of correlation with the Lund-Mackay Score (r = 0.835, p < 0.001). The Lund-Kennedy score had a positive correlation with The Lund-Mackay score. CONCLUSION: DNE can be utilized as an early diagnostic tool in the clinical evaluation of CRS and is equally effective as CT in diagnosing the same. At the same time, a CT scan can be done in patients with positive symptoms and can be reserved as a second-level investigation for those patients with negative endoscopic findings but who become symptomatic on follow-up.