RESUMEN

Resumen Objetivo: evaluar, en una población trabajadora de la salud con COVID-19, la gravedad de la enfermedad y el impacto de un programa de rehabilitación cardiopulmonar ambulatorio fase II basado en ejercicio, en la capacidad funcional, la función medida con la Escala de Estado Funcional posCOVID y el reintegro laboral. Materiales y método: se realizó un estudio cuasiexperimental en 48 trabajadores de la salud con infección por COVID-19. Al inicio y al final se les evaluó gravedad de la infección, función cardiopulmonar y escala de estado funcional post-COVID-19 (PCFS). Se hizo un programa de rehabilitación cardiopulmonar con tres sesiones semanales de ejercicio continuo e interválico individualizado, con una duración de 20 a 60 minutos y una intensidad del 60 al 80% de la frecuencia cardíaca máxima durante un mes. Resultados: hubo 19 casos moderados y 29 graves. La edad promedio fue 54 (DE: 15.5) años, 41.7% eran empleados, 47.9% obesos y 39.6% hipertensos. El 68.8% tuvo neumonía típica, el 29.2% estrés postraumático, el 43.8% síndrome depresivo y el 50% trastornos de ansiedad. La capacidad cardiopulmonar pasó de NYHA II (5.7 DE: 1.2) a NYHA I (8.2: DE: 2.0). Mejoró la independencia en actividades de la vida diaria (ADV) (escala PCFS) y 36 pacientes regresaron a su trabajo. No hubo complicaciones graves. Conclusión: este estudio demostró el impacto positivo de un programa de rehabilitación cardiopulmonar en la función cardiopulmonar y la independencia en actividades diarias e instrumentales en trabajadores de la salud con COVID-19, pues un 75% de estos regresó a sus labores habituales.

Abstract Objective: to evaluate, in a health worker population with COVID-19, the severity of the disease and the impact of an outpatient phase II PRCP based on exercise, on functional capacity, function measured with the post-COVID Functional Status Scale and job reinstatement. Materials and method: a quasi-experimental study was conducted involving 48 healthcare workers with COVID-19. Severity of infection, cardiopulmonary function, and PCFS were assessed at the beginning and end. The CPRP included a program of three weekly sessions of individualized continuous and interval exercises lasting 20 to 60 minutes, with an intensity of 60 to 80% of maximum heart rate over one month. Results: there were 19 moderate cases and 29 severe cases. The average age was 54 (SD: 15.5) years, with 41.7% being employees, 47.9% obese, and 39.6% hypertensive, 68.8% had typical pneumonia, 29.2% experienced post-traumatic stress, 43.8% had depressive syndrome, and 50% had anxiety disorders. Cardiopulmonary capacity improved from NYHA II (5.7 SD: 1.2) to NYHA I (8.2 SD: 2.0). Independence in activities of daily living (PCFS scale) improved and 36 patients returned to work. There were no severe complications. Conclusion: This study demonstrated a positive impact of the CPRP on cardiopulmonary function and independence in daily and instrumental activities among healthcare workers with COVID-19, with 75% returning to their regular duties.

RESUMEN

Background and Objectives: During the Coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) pandemic, isolation and prevention measures to reduce COVID-19 contagions are essential for the care of all people; these measures should comply with the principles of inclusion and accessibility for people with disabilities (PWD), with all kinds of deficiencies and levels of dependency. Thereby, the aim of this article is to present the measures adopted for PWD or people with rehabilitation needs, for containment, mitigation, or suppression of the SARS-CoV-2 virus in different countries of all continents and of all income levels. Methods: A narrative approach was used in this article. First, a broad search was carried out in the 193 member states of the UN, and then 98 countries that issued any document, report, or information related to disability and COVID-19 were selected. Finally, 32 countries were included in this article because they presented official information. We considered official sources, the information available in the government, or on the health ministry page of the country. In this way, the countries that presented information which did not correspond to an official source were excluded. The search was conducted in August 2020 and updated in March 2021. Results: First, the non-pharmacological general interventions for PWD included informative measures and general recommendations during the stay at home, isolation, and biosecurity measures, contagion prevention, detection of positive cases, mobilization measures, and measures implemented in institutions or residences of PWD. Second, we identified the economic and social benefits provided to PWD during the pandemic. Finally, we identified the measures taken by countries according to the type of impairment (visual, hearing, physical, mental, and cardiopulmonary impairment) during the COVID-19 pandemic. Conclusion: In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, only 50% of countries from the five world regions created and implemented specific measures for PWD to containment, mitigation, or suppression of the SARS-CoV-2 virus. There is very little specific information available about the measures to continue with the care of people with rehabilitation needs and the long-term follow-up of PWD, and for the prevention and response to violence, especially for women with disabilities.