RESUMEN
PURPOSE: To investigate the performance of a model-based optimization process for volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) applied to prostate cancer patients with the multi-planner. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The 120 prostate plans for VMAT treatment were entered into the database system of the RapidPlan (RP) knowledge-based treatment planning. The treatment planning data for each plan was used to create and train the RP model. Twelve prostate cancer cases were selected and were used for planning by a manual of 12 planners based on the clinical protocol for dose constraints. Then, the treatment plans for each patient were compared with the RP model plans and analyzed with Wilcoxon tests. RESULTS: On average, the RP models can estimate comparable doses among all planner plans and clinical plans for the PTV, which Dmax , D95% , D98% , HI, and CI were used to evaluate. For the normal organ doses of the bladder, rectum, penile bulb, and femoral head, all RP model plans showed comparable or better dose sparing than all planner plans and clinical plans. Moreover, the average planning time of the RP model was faster than manual plans by about two times. The RP model can significantly reduce the variation dose of the normal organs compared with the manual plans among the planners. CONCLUSION: The automated plans of the RP model might benefit from further fine-tuning of the dose constraints of the normal organs, although both procedure plans are acceptable and fulfill the clinical protocol goals so that the RP model can enhance the efficacy and quality of plans.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Próstata , Radioterapia de Intensidad Modulada , Masculino , Humanos , Radioterapia de Intensidad Modulada/métodos , Dosificación Radioterapéutica , Planificación de la Radioterapia Asistida por Computador/métodos , Recto , Neoplasias de la Próstata/radioterapia , Órganos en RiesgoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: The well-being of breast cancer patients is essential, especially fertility in patients of reproductive age. The objective of this study was to estimate the radiation doses to the ovaries and uterus for different treatment techniques of breast cancer irradiation using radio-photoluminescent glass dosimeters (RPLDs). METHODS: A Farmer-type ionisation chamber (IBA FC-65G) and RPLDs were used to measure in- and out-of-field radiation doses in a solid water phantom. The field sizes were set to 10 × 10 cm2 and 8 × 17 cm2 with the central axis at out-of-field measurement distances of 30 or 50 cm. The Rando phantom's left breast was planned using four different techniques: two tangential standard fields with and without electronic tissue compensator (E-comp) techniques, intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT). The radiation doses in the ipsilateral ovary, contralateral ovary and uterus were measured using RPLDs. RESULTS: The percentage ratio of out of field to in field was affected by distance from the central axis to the point of measurement, in addition to the field sizes associated with collimator scatter. Advanced techniques such as IMRT and VMAT produced higher doses to the ovaries and uterus. The estimated results of the worst-case scenario for the ipsilateral ovary, contralateral ovary and uterus were 0.84% (42 cGy), 0.62% (31 cGy) and 0.76% (38 cGy), respectively, for a 5000 cGy prescription dose. CONCLUSION: The lowest to highest out-of-field radiation doses to the ovarian and uterine organs from breast irradiation were the two tangential field techniques, VMAT and IMRT. These advanced techniques yielded higher radiation leakage, which potentially contributed to the out-of-field radiation dose.