RESUMEN
Diabetes mellitus (DM) in children is most often caused by impaired insulin secretion (type 1 DM). In some children, the underlying mechanism for DM is increased insulin resistance, which can have different underlying causes. While the majority of these children require insulin dosages less than 2.0 U/kg/day to achieve normoglycemia, higher insulin requirements indicate severe insulin resistance. Considering the therapeutic challenges in patients with severe insulin resistance, early diagnosis of the underlying cause is essential in order to consider targeted therapies and to prevent diabetic complications. Although rare, several disorders can attribute to severe insulin resistance in pediatric patients. Most of these disorders are diagnosed through advanced diagnostic tests, which are not commonly available in low- or middle-income countries. Based on a case of DM with severe insulin resistance in a Surinamese adolescent who was later confirmed to have autosomal recessive congenital generalized lipodystrophy, type 1 (Berardinelli-Seip syndrome), we provide a systematic approach to the differential diagnosis and work-up. We show that a thorough review of medical history and physical examination generally provide sufficient information to diagnose a child with insulin-resistant DM correctly, and, therefore, our approach is especially applicable to low- or middle-income countries.
Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus/fisiopatología , Resistencia a la Insulina , Lipodistrofia Generalizada Congénita/diagnóstico , Adolescente , Países en Desarrollo , Femenino , Humanos , PronósticoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether central adrenal insufficiency (CAI) is present in CHARGE (Coloboma of the eye, Heart defects, Atresia of the choanae, Retardation of growth and/or development, Genital hypoplasia, and Ear abnormalities, including deafness) syndrome, a complex malformation disorder that includes central endocrine dysfunction. STUDY DESIGN: Two cross-sectional studies were performed in Dutch (September 2013-February 2015) and Australian (January 2012-January 2014) CHARGE syndrome clinics. Twenty-seven Dutch and 19 Australian patients (aged 16 months-18 years) with genetically confirmed CHARGE syndrome were included. The low-dose adrenocorticotropin (ACTH) test was used to assess CAI in the Dutch cohort. A peak cortisol response less than 18.1 µg/dL (500 nmol/L) was suspected for CAI, and a glucagon stimulation test was performed for confirmation. Australian patients were screened by single measurements of ACTH and cortisol levels. If adrenal dysfunction was suspected, a standard-dose ACTH test was performed. RESULTS: The low-dose ACTH test was performed in 23 patients (median age 8.4 [1.9-16.9] years). Seven patients showed an insufficient maximum cortisol level (10.3-17.6 µg/dL, 285-485 nmol/L), but CAI was confirmed by glucagon stimulation test in only 1 patient (maximum cortisol level 15.0 µg/dL, 415 nmol/L). In the Australian cohort, 15 patients (median age 9.1 [1.3-17.8] years) were screened, and none had CAI. CONCLUSIONS: CAI was not common in our cohorts, and routine testing of adrenal function in children with CHARGE syndrome is not indicated.
Asunto(s)
Insuficiencia Suprarrenal/etiología , Síndrome CHARGE/complicaciones , Adolescente , Insuficiencia Suprarrenal/epidemiología , Niño , Preescolar , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , MasculinoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that a smell test could predict the occurrence of hypogonadotropic hypogonadism (HH) in patients with CHARGE syndrome, which is a variable combination of ocular coloboma, heart defects, choanal atresia, retardation of growth/development, genital hypoplasia, and ear anomalies or hearing loss caused by mutations in the CHD7 (chromodomain helicase DNA binding protein 7) gene. STUDY DESIGN: We performed endocrine studies and smell testing (University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test) in 35 adolescent patients with molecularly confirmed CHARGE syndrome. RESULTS: Complete data on smell and puberty were available for 15 patients; 11 patients had both anosmia and HH, whereas 4 patients had normosmia/hyposmia and spontaneous puberty. In addition, 7 boys were highly suspected of having HH (they were too young for definite HH diagnosis, but all had cryptorchidism, micropenis, or both) and had anosmia. The type of CHD7 mutation could not predict HH because a father and daughter with the same CHD7 mutation were discordant for HH and anosmia. CONCLUSION: Anosmia and HH were highly correlated in our cohort, and therefore smell testing seems to be an attractive method for predicting the occurrence of HH in patients with CHARGE syndrome. The use of this test could prevent delay of hormonal pubertal induction, resulting in an age-appropriate puberty.