Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effects of hemofiltration on serum aprotinin levels during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) surgery. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized study. SETTING: University of Washington Medical Center, single institution. PARTICIPANTS: Patients undergoing cardiac surgery without contraindications to aprotinin administration. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomized to full-Hammersmith and half-Hammersmith dosing regimens of aprotinin and were further randomized to hemofiltration or no hemofiltration. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Serum aprotinin levels were studied before CPB, 60 and 120 minutes into CPB, and at the end of CPB before protamine administration. Each group experienced a decrease in serum aprotinin levels with the institution of CPB, attributable to hemodilution and redistribution of aprotinin outside of the vascular compartment. During CPB, aprotinin levels declined further, but no significant difference was observed between patients who received hemofiltration and those who did not. Hematocrit values were significantly higher at the end of CPB in the hemofiltration groups. Patients receiving half-Hammersmith dosing regimens maintained aprotinin levels throughout CPB, which have been shown to inhibit plasmin but were lower than levels previously shown to inhibit kallikrein. CONCLUSIONS: Hemofiltration during CPB did not significantly alter serum aprotinin levels in patients receiving half-Hammersmith and full-Hammersmith dosing regimens of aprotinin.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Impaired exercise tolerance during formal testing is predictive of perioperative complications. However, for most patients, formal exercise testing is not indicated, and exercise tolerance is assessed by history. OBJECTIVE: To determine the relationship between self-reported exercise tolerance and serious perioperative complications. METHODS: Our study group consisted of 600 consecutive outpatients referred to a medical consultation clinic at a tertiary care medical center for preoperative evaluation before undergoing 612 major noncardiac procedures. Patients were asked to estimate the number of blocks they could walk and flights of stairs they could climb without experiencing symptomatic limitation. Patients who could not walk 4 blocks and climb 2 flights of stairs were considered to have poor exercise tolerance. All patients were evaluated for the development of 26 serious complications that occurred during hospitalization. RESULTS: Patients reporting poor exercise tolerance had more perioperative complications (20.4% vs 10.4%; P<.001). Specifically, they had more myocardial ischemia (P = .02) and more cardiovascular (P = .04) and neurologic (P = .03) events. Poor exercise tolerance predicted risk for serious complications independent of all other patient characteristics, including age (adjusted odds ratio, 1.94; 95% confidence interval, 1.19-3.17). The likelihood of a serious complication occurring was inversely related to the number blocks that could be walked (P = .006) or flights of stairs that could be climbed (P = .01). Other patient characteristics predicting serious complications in multivariable regression analysis included history of congestive heart failure, dementia, Parkinson disease, and smoking greater than or equal to 20 pack-years. CONCLUSION: Self-reported exercise tolerance can be used to predict in-hospital perioperative risk, even when using relatively simple and familiar measures.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

UNLABELLED: In this retrospective cohort study, we compared adverse cardiac outcomes after noncardiac surgery among patients with prior percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA), patients with nonrevascularized coronary artery disease (CAD), and normal controls. Inpatient hospital discharge abstracts from all nonfederal acute care hospitals in Washington State linked to death certificates were evaluated. Patients > or =45 yr old with prior PTCA who underwent noncardiac surgery from 1987 to 1993 were matched by age, sex, surgery type, and discharge year to 686 patients with CAD and to 2155 normal controls (no CAD). We compared risk for adverse cardiac outcomes (death, myocardial infarction, angina, congestive heart failure, malignant dysrhythmia, cardiogenic shock, coronary artery bypass graft, or PTCA) within 30 days. Patients with PTCA had twice the risk of adverse cardiac outcome as normal controls (odds ratio [OR] 1.98; P < 0.001), with a higher risk of angina (OR 7.84), congestive heart failure (OR 2.06), and myocardial infarction (OR 3.86) but a lower risk of death (OR 0.46; P < 0.001). Patients with PTCA had half the risk of adverse cardiac outcome as patients with CAD (OR 0.50; P < 0.001), including less risk of angina (OR 0.51) and congestive heart failure (OR 0.40; P < 0.001), but no difference in myocardial infarction (P = 0.304) or death (P = 0.436). No difference was found between 142 patients with recent PTCA (< or =90 days before noncardiac surgery) matched to patients with CAD (OR 0.90; P = 0.396). Patients revascularized by PTCA >90 days before noncardiac surgery seem to have a lower risk of poor outcome than nonrevascularized patients, although not as low as normal controls. For recent PTCA patients, the lack of difference compared with CAD patient outcomes requires a larger sample size for verification. Present findings do not lend support to a role for prophylactic PTCA to improve noncardiac surgery outcomes. This investigation did not control for CAD severity, medical management, or comorbidities. Study of these factors is needed before the clinical implications of PTCA for noncardiac surgical risk can be completely assessed. IMPLICATIONS: Hospital records showed patients with prior percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty were twice as likely as healthy patients to have an adverse cardiac outcome after noncardiac surgery, although their risk was reduced by half compared with patients with untreated coronary artery disease. Further study of the role of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty in modulating noncardiac surgery risk is needed.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The combination of propofol and alfentanil with nitrous oxide provides balanced anesthesia with rapid recovery and minimal emetic side effects. The object of this study was to compare recovery parameters at varying proportions of propofol and alfentanil, and to determine the dosing rate and plasma concentration of propofol necessary to supplement nitrous oxide in the presence of varying concentrations of alfentanil METHODS: Forty-eight patients were anesthetized with nitrous oxide, targeted manual infusions of alfentanil (target plasma concentrations of 0, 50, 100, and 150 ng/ml), and propofol at rates that were varied up or down by 25% depending on the response (movement/no movement) of the preceding patient (at the same alfentanil target concentrations) to ulnar-nerve stimulation. The minimum concentrations of propofol and alfentanil required to prevent movement in 50% of patients (EC50) was determined by logistic regression. Speed of emergence and recovery of cognitive function, time to discharge, and incidence of side effects were compared for four different combinations of propofol and alfentanil with nitrous oxide. RESULTS: The EC50 for propofol alone with nitrous oxide was 6.1 microg/ml. AlfentaniL at concentrations of 41+/-17 (SD), 113+/-54, and 130+/-61 ng/mL reduced the EC50 of propofol to 3.3, 2.3, and 2.2 microg/ml, respectively, and decreased emergence time (eye opening) to 8.1, 4.9, and 3.4 min, compared with 24.3 min for propofol alone. Side effects did not differ between groups. CONCLUSIONS: The authors conclude that there is a synergistic effect between propofol and alfentanil, and that combining alfentanil with propofol is associated with faster early recovery.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Accurate criteria for death are increasingly important as it becomes more difficult for the public to distinguish between patients who are still alive from those who, through the aid of medical technology, merely look like they are alive even though they are dead. Patients and their families need to know that a clear line can be drawn between life and death, and that patients who are alive will not be unintentionally treated as though they are dead. For the public to trust the pronouncements of medical doctors as to whether a patient is dead or alive, the criteria must be unambiguous, understandable, and infallible. It is equally important to physicians that accurate, infallible criteria define death. Physicians need to know that a clear line can be drawn between life and death so that patients who are dead are not treated as though they are alive. Such criteria enable us to terminate expensive medical care to corpses. Clear criteria for death also allow us to ethically request the gift of vital organs. Clear, infallible criteria allow us to assure families and society that one living person will not be intentionally or unintentionally killed for the sake of another. The pressure of organ scarcity must not lead physicians to allow the criteria for life and death to become blurred because of the irreparable harm this would cause to the patient-physician relationship and the devastating impact it could have on organ transplantation. As the cases presented here illustrate, anesthesiologists have an important responsibility in the process of assuring that some living patients are not sacrificed to benefit others. Criteria for declaring death should be familiar to every anesthesiologist participating in organ retrieval. Before accepting the responsibility of maintaining a donor for vital organ collection, the anesthesiologist should review data supplied in the chart supporting the diagnosis of brain death and seriously question inconsistencies and inadequate testing conditions. Knowledge of brain death criteria and proper application of these criteria could have changed the course of each of the cases presented.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: A previous retrospective study reported that propofol anesthesia decreased bleeding during endoscopic sinus surgery compared with isoflurane. We performed a prospective study to compare the effects of propofol versus isoflurane on measured blood loss and the surgeon's subjective assessment of operating conditions during endoscopic sinus surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: After receiving institutional review board approval and written informed consent, 56 patients undergoing endoscopic sinus surgery were randomly assigned to receive propofol (n = 30) or isoflurane (n = 26) supplemented with nitrous oxide-oxygen and alfentanil. Blood loss was calculated from the hemoglobin concentration in suction canisters. One surgeon, who was blinded to the anesthetic agent, performed every procedure and assessed bleeding as follows: 1, no bleeding; 2, modest bleeding; 3, bleeding interfering with operating conditions and cause for an agent switch; and 4, intolerable bleeding requiring a change in surgical plan. Results were compared in the two anesthetic groups using chi-squared test, unpaired t-test, Mann-Whitney Utest, and a permutation test. A P of .05 was considered significant. RESULTS: Mean bleeding scores were less over time (P = .02) with propofol anesthesia, particularly in surgery in the ethmoid and sphenoid sinuses (P = .03), and the proportion of patients with a mean score >2 was less in the propofol group (30% v 54%; P = .033). Time until discharge to home or to a limited stay in a hospital bed was also less in the propofol group (183 v 243 minutes; P = .019). CONCLUSION: In our study, surgical blood loss was the same for both anesthetic agents overall, but propofol appeared to offer an advantage in terms of subjective improvement in operating conditions, particularly in the ethmoid and sphenoid sinuses.

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Prophylactic percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty is one revascularization strategy employed to reduce risks of cardiac complications after noncardiac surgery in certain patients. Reduced adverse cardiac event rates are at least partially offset by costs and complications of angioplasty. Patients who undergo noncardiac surgery within 90 days of coronary angioplasty may be at increased risk for postoperative cardiac complications.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND AIM: The recent introduction of new measurement technology (using ion specific electrodes) makes intraoperative evaluation of blood ionized magnesium (Mg2+, or iMg)--the bioactive fraction of circulation magnesium--possible. The goals of this study were: (1) to examine the longitudinal pattern(s) of change in blood iMg during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB); and (2) to determine the relationship of iMg to Ca2+ (iCa), K, pH, Na, and hematocrit (Hct) during CPB. METHODS: Blood was collected serially before, during, and after CPB on 30 patients undergoing elective coronary artery bypass graft procedures and the iMg was measured with an AVL Scientific Corp., model 988-4 instrument. RESULTS: Overall, 73% of iMg results were abnormally low, 50% during CPB. Some cases had both hypo- and hyperionized magnesemic episodes. There were low iCa during CPB in 97% of cases. Using Spearman's rank order correlations and p < 0.05, iMg and K were directly correlated before, during, and after bypass, suggesting their parallel movement between tissue and blood. iMg and iCa were directly correlated before, and inversely correlated after, CPB, but unassociated during bypass. iMg and Na were inversely correlated after bypass in all cases. iMg was inversely correlated to pH and positively correlated to Hct during CPB only, and only in patients with concurrent association of iMg and iCa. CONCLUSIONS: Blood iMg depletion occurs frequently in CPB patients. iMg changes are not readily predictable. The association of intraoperative iMg depletion with postsurgical atrial fibrillation--reported to have a hypomagnesemic connection- should be investigated.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Nine cases of traumatic aortic tear treated during 1986-1987 were reviewed. Two patients had functioning Gott shunts, six patients had simple crossclamp, and one patient had a Gott shunt placed which was nonfunctional. Anesthetic management was similar in all patients. Clamp times ranged in unshunted patients from 25 to 38 minutes, and in shunted patients from 42 to 50 minutes. The crossclamp time of the patient with the nonfunctional shunt was 42 minutes. Declamping was accompanied in unshunted patients by decreases in core temperature of up to 1 degree C and acute decreases in PaO2. Marked respiratory and metabolic acidosis occurred with declamping. Respiratory acidosis resolved within 30 minutes with hyperventilation, but metabolic acidosis persisted despite bicarbonate therapy (mean = 1.2 mEq/kg) up to 6 hours after declamping. Associated elevations in serum potassium resolved as pH returned to baseline. Acid-base and electrolyte abnormalities were less marked in patients who were shunted.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

This report describes a patient who developed dyspnea and bilateral pulmonary infiltrates following exposure to cephradine. The role of cephradine was substantiated by rechallenge.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

A convenient method for quantitating the sensitivity of large numbers of bacterial strains (presently Corynebacterium diphtheriae) to a Staphylococcus aureus phage type 71 bacteriocin is described.

Asunto(s)