RESUMEN
BACKGROUND The long- term clinical outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention can be improved by replacing metallic drug eluting stents with bioresorbable vascular scaffolds. The MeRes-1 Extend trial was designed to assess the safety and efficacy of a novel thin-strut MeRes100 bioresorbable vascular scaffold (Meril Life Sci ences) in a diverse patient population. METHODS The MeRes-1 Extend was a prospective, multicenter, sin gle-arm study that enrolled 64 patients in Spain, Macedonia, Brazil, South Africa, Malaysia, and Indonesia. Major adverse cardiac events, consisting of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and ischemia driven target lesion revascularisation, were the safety endpoint. At baseline and 6-month follow-up, quantitative coronary angiography and optical coherence tomography were performed. RESULTS Of all patients enrolled (mean age: 58.30 9.02 years), 76.56% had hypertension, 26.56% had diabetes mellitus, 48.44% had dyslipidemia, and 28.13% had a previous myocardial infarction; 68.75% of patients presented with stable angina, 9.38% with unstable angina, and 21.88% with silent ischemia. A total of 69 target lesions (mean length: 14.37 5.89 mm) were detected of which 71.01% were type B2/C. Procedural and device success were achieved in 64 and 62 patients, respectively. Major adverse cardiac events rate was reported in 1 patient (1.61%) in the form of ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization; there were no cases of myocardial infarction, car diac death, or scaffold thrombosis. At 6-month angiographic follow-up (n » 32), mean in-scaffold late lumen loss was 0.18 0.31 mm. Optical coherence tomography analysis (n » 21) showed 97.95 3.69% strut coverage and mean scaffold area of 7.56 1.79 mm2, with no strut malapposition. Updated data will be presented during Transcatheter Cardiovascular Therapeutics 2020 annual meeting. CONCLUSION Two-year clinical and 6-month imaging outcomes of MeRes-1 Extend trial demonstrated favorable safety and efficacy of novel thin-strut MeRes100 sirolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffolds in patients with de novo coronary artery lesions.
Asunto(s)
Stents Liberadores de Fármacos , Intervención Coronaria PercutáneaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: The authors sought to identify and verify independent correlates of device thrombosis from an analysis of multicenter trials and registries. BACKGROUND: Recent analyses suggest an increased risk of device thrombosis with Absorb bioresorbable vascular scaffold (Abbott Vascular, Santa Clara, California) implantation compared with metallic drug-eluting stents, and data from moderate size studies suggest a risk relationship to vessel size and technique. METHODS: From 8,771 consecutively treated patients, 105 patients (1.2%) were identified with scaffold thrombosis within 1 year of implantation. They were matched 2:1 with controls selected randomly from nonthrombosis patients. Data-restricted multiple logistic analysis was used to identify significant independent covariates of the outcome. RESULTS: Early (within 1 month) scaffold thrombosis occurred in 69 patients and late (1 to 12 months) thrombosis occurred in 36 patients. Modelling found significant correlations of thrombosis to be final minimal lumen diameter 1.1:1 balloon/scaffold ratio (OR: 2.3; p = 0.022), and reference vessel diameter <2.40 mm (OR: 2.1; p = 0.036).CONCLUSIONS:Suboptimal vessel sizing, procedural technique, angiographic outcomes, and dual antiplatelet therapy discontinuation appear to be the principal determinants of Absorb scaffold thrombosis risk through 12 months after implantation.
Asunto(s)
Stents Liberadores de Fármacos , Trombosis , Vasos SanguíneosRESUMEN
Objectives The aim of this study was to evaluate 1-year clinical outcomes of diabetic patients treatedwith the Absorb bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS).Background Clinical outcomes of diabetic patients after BVS implantation have been unreported.Methods This study included 101 patients in the ABSORB Cohort B trial and the first consecutive 450patients with 1 year of follow-up in the ABSORB EXTEND trial. A total of 136 diabetic patients werecompared with 415 nondiabetic patients. In addition, 882 diabetic patients treated with everolimuselutingmetal stents (EES) in pooled data from the SPIRIT trials (SPIRIT FIRST [Clinical Trial of the AbbottVascular XIENCE V Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System], SPIRIT II [A Clinical Evaluation of the XIENCEV Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System], SPIRIT III [Clinical Trial of the XIENCE V Everolimus ElutingCoronary Stent System (EECSS)], SPIRIT IV Clinical Trial [Clinical Evaluation of the XIENCE V EverolimusEluting Coronary Stent System]) were used for the comparison by applying propensity score matching.The primary endpoint was a device-oriented composite endpoint (DoCE), including cardiac death, targetvessel myocardial infarction, and target lesion revascularization at 1-year follow-up.Results The cumulative incidence of DoCE did not differ between diabetic and nondiabetic patientstreated with the BVS (3.7% vs. 5.1%, p » 0.64). Diabetic patients treated with the BVS had a similarincidence of the DoCE compared with diabetic patients treated with EES in the matched study group(3.9% for the BVS vs. 6.4% for EES, p » 0.38). There were no differences in the incidence of definite orprobable scaffold/stent thrombosis (0.7% for both diabetic and nondiabetic patients with the BVS; 1.0%for diabetic patients with the BVS vs. 1.7% for diabetic patients with EES in the matched study group).Conclusions In the present analyses, diabetic patients treated with the BVS showed...