Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Perinat Med ; 50(1): 74-81, 2022 Jan 27.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34534426

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study is to determine the quality of the foetal heart rate (FHR) recording, defined as signal loss, during preterm labour below 28 weeks gestational age (GA) and contribute to the discussion if cardiotocography (CTG) is of value for the extreme preterm foetus. METHODS: From January 2010 to December 2019 a retrospective study was conducted with data of 95 FHR recordings of singletons born between 24 and 28 weeks GA at the Amsterdam University Medical Centre, location VUmc. FHR tracings had a duration of at least 30 min and were obtained via external ultrasound mode. Data of all recordings were divided in two groups according to gestation (24-26 weeks and 26-28 weeks). Signal loss was analysed. Statistical significance was calculated by non-parametric tests and chi-square tests. The median signal loss and the proportion of cases exceeding the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics Guidelines (FIGO) threshold of 20% signal loss were calculated. RESULTS: One-third of the recordings exceeded the 20% FIGO-criterion for adequate signal quality during the first stage of labour. In the second stage, this was nearly 75%. Similarly, the median signal loss was 13% during the first and 30% during the second stage of labour (p<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The quality of FHR monitoring in the extreme preterm foetus is inadequate in a large proportion of the foetuses, especially during the second stage. FHR monitoring is therefore controversial and should be used with caution.


Asunto(s)
Cardiotocografía/normas , Trabajo de Parto Prematuro , Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Adulto , Parto Obstétrico/métodos , Femenino , Edad Gestacional , Humanos , Masculino , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Embarazo , Estudios Retrospectivos
2.
J Minim Invasive Gynecol ; 27(7): 1636-1639, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32474172

RESUMEN

Abdominal cerclage is an effective treatment for cervical incompetence in patients with a previously failed vaginal cerclage or with anatomic restrictions to a vaginal cerclage. Management of second trimester complications that warrant a delivery impose a complex clinical situation in patients with an abdominal cerclage. We report 3 cases of successful removal of an abdominal cerclage by posterior and anterior colpotomy in the second trimester of pregnancy. This new and minimally invasive surgical technique avoids the need for extensive dilation, laparoscopy, or laparotomy to remove the cerclage and allow a vaginal delivery.


Asunto(s)
Cerclaje Cervical , Colpotomía/métodos , Remoción de Dispositivos/métodos , Suturas , Incompetencia del Cuello del Útero/cirugía , Abdomen/patología , Abdomen/cirugía , Adulto , Cerclaje Cervical/efectos adversos , Cerclaje Cervical/instrumentación , Cerclaje Cervical/métodos , Colpotomía/instrumentación , Parto Obstétrico , Femenino , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Laparoscopía/instrumentación , Laparoscopía/métodos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Mínimamente Invasivos/métodos , Embarazo , Complicaciones del Embarazo/cirugía , Segundo Trimestre del Embarazo , Suturas/efectos adversos , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA