RESUMEN
Background: Musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) pose a pervasive concern among nursing professionals due to the high physical workload. Simultaneously, the complex relationship between MSDs and mental health outcomes in this population remains an area of significant interest and importance. Objective: This study aimed to investigate the occurrence of MSDs and their relationships with burnout and psychological suffering within the nursing workforce. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in 2020 involving 291 nursing professionals in Brazil. Standardized questionnaires were employed to gather information on MSDs, mental health outcomes, and pertinent work-related factors. Robust statistical analyses were conducted to ascertain the prevalence of MSDs, establish associations between MSDs and mental health outcomes, and delineate the influence of work-related factors on these associations. Statistical analysis was performed using the R software. Results: The study revealed a significant prevalence of musculoskeletal injuries (MSIs) among nursing workers, focusing on regions that include the lower back, upper back, neck, and shoulders. Individuals with MSIs in the lower back showed a marked increase in emotional exhaustion (p = 0.02), as did those with MSIs in the upper back (p <0.01) and depersonalization (p = 0.07). On the other hand, nursing professionals who reported MSIs in the neck and shoulders had considerably higher scores in emotional exhaustion (p <0.01 and p = 0.01, respectively) and depersonalization (p = 0.05 and p = 0.05, respectively). However, no significant correlations emerged between MSIs and depression or work-related factors. Conclusions: This study highlights the urgency of implementing proactive measures to prevent and manage MSDs within the nursing profession. Moreover, it emphasizes the critical need to enhance working conditions and provide robust support mechanisms to safeguard the mental health of nursing professionals.Open AccessOpen Access.
RESUMEN
Background and Objectives: hand hygiene (HH) is a crucial safety practice, but lack of knowledge can hinder compliance. The objective was to measure and assess the knowledge of nursing professionals who provided care during the COVID-19 pandemic regarding HH and to verify the association between HH knowledge and professional category and regions in Brazil. Methods: an observational study was conducted from November 2020 to December 2021 involving 493 nursing professionals from all regions of Brazil. Data collection was carried out using Google Forms® and social media platforms. The Hand Hygiene Knowledge Test for Healthcare Professionals was used, and results were analyzed descriptively. Pearson's chi-square test (x2) and Fisher's exact test were employed to assess associations. Results: among the participants, the majority (74.7%) had limited or subpar knowledge of HH. Nurses had a higher level of knowledge compared to nursing assistants and licensed practical nurses. Associations were found between professional category and correct answers regarding microorganism destruction time and the type of HH to be used. Conclusion: Brazilian nursing professionals had limited knowledge of HH, with nurses displaying a higher level of knowledge compared to nursing assistants and licensed practical nurse. Continuous education and guidance are necessary to improve HH practices among the nursing staff.(AU)
Justificativas e Objetivos: a higiene das mãos (HM) é uma prática crucial para a segurança, mas a falta de conhecimento pode prejudicar a adesão. Este estudo avaliou o conhecimento dos profissionais de enfermagem que prestaram cuidados durante a pandemia de Covid-19 em relação à HM e explorou a associação entre o conhecimento de HM, categoria profissional e regiões no Brasil. Métodos: um estudo observacional foi conduzido de novembro de 2020 a dezembro de 2021 envolvendo 493 profissionais de enfermagem de todas as regiões do Brasil. A coleta de dados foi realizada usando o Google Forms® e plataformas de mídia social. Foi utilizado o Teste de Conhecimento de Higiene das Mãos para Profissionais de Saúde, e os resultados foram analisados descritivamente. O teste qui-quadrado de Pearson (x2) e o teste exato de Fisher foram empregados para avaliar as associações. Resultados: entre os participantes, a maioria (74,7%) tinha conhecimento limitado ou insuficiente sobre HM. Os enfermeiros apresentaram um nível mais elevado de conhecimento em comparação com os auxiliares e técnicos de enfermagem. Foram encontradas associações entre a categoria profissional e respostas corretas sobre o tempo de destruição de microrganismos e o tipo de HM a ser utilizado. Conclusão: os profissionais de enfermagem brasileiros possuíam conhecimento limitado sobre HM, sendo que os enfermeiros apresentaram um nível mais elevado de conhecimento em comparação com os auxiliares e técnicos de enfermagem. Educação contínua e orientação são necessárias para melhorar as práticas de HM entre a equipe de enfermagem.(AU)
Justificación e Objetivos: la higiene de manos (HM) es una práctica de seguridad crucial, pero la falta de conocimiento puede dificultar el cumplimiento. Este estudio evaluó el conocimiento de los profesionales de enfermería que brindaron atención durante la pandemia de Covid-19 en relación con la HM y exploró la asociación entre el conocimiento de HM, la categoría profesional y las regiones en Brasil. Métodos: se realizó un estudio observacional desde noviembre de 2020 hasta diciembre de 2021 que incluyó a 493 profesionales de enfermería de todas las regiones de Brasil. La recopilación de datos se realizó utilizando Google Forms® y plataformas de redes sociales. Se utilizó el Test de Conocimiento de Higiene de Manos para Profesionales de la Salud, y los resultados se analizaron de manera descriptiva. Se emplearon la prueba chi-cuadrado de Pearson (x2) y la prueba exacta de Fisher para evaluar las asociaciones. Resultados: entre los participantes, la mayoría (74,7%) tenía conocimiento limitado o deficiente de HM. Las enfermeras tenían un nivel de conocimiento más alto en comparación con los auxiliares y técnicos de enfermería. Se encontraron asociaciones entre la categoría profesional y las respuestas correctas sobre el tiempo de destrucción de microorganismos y el tipo de HM que debía utilizarse. Conclusión: los profesionales de enfermería brasileños tenían un conocimiento limitado de HM, siendo que las enfermeras mostraban un nivel de conocimiento más alto en comparación con los auxiliares y técnicos de enfermería. Se requiere educación continua y orientación para mejorar las prácticas de HM entre el equipo de enfermería(AU)
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Brasil , Control de Infecciones , Educación Continua , Higiene de las Manos , COVID-19 , Enfermeras Practicantes , Grupo de EnfermeríaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Healthcare-associated infections are among the most common complications during hospitalization. These infections increase morbidity and mortality and they increase length of hospital stay and the cost of healthcare. The aims of our study were to monitor hand hygiene (HH) compliance, HH technique quality and factors related to HH practice among health professionals in a COVID-19 Intensive Care Unit (ICU). METHODS: An observational, prospective study. Between September and December 2021, we observed 69 healthcare professionals in an eight-bed ICU for patients with COVID-19 in midwestern Brazil. We used the WHO observation form to collect data. The dependent variable was HH compliance and independent variables were professional category, sex, HH quality (3-step technique for at least 15 s), number of HH opportunities observed, observation shift and inappropriate glove use. RESULTS: We observed 1185 HH opportunities. The overall compliance rate was 26.4%, but only 6.5% were performed with the correct 3-step technique for the minimum time. HH compliance was considerably lower for moments "before" tasks (6.7%; 95% CI 4.8%, 9.2%) compared with moments "after" tasks (43.8%; 95% CI 39.9%, 47.8%). The logistic model found that inappropriate glove use, night shift and physicians (p < 0.001) were associated with low HH compliance. The infrastructure analysis found that the unit had an insufficient number of alcohol-based handrub (ABHR) dispensers at the point of care and that the mechanism for activating them was poorly designed. CONCLUSIONS: HH compliance was very low. Inappropriate glove use was associated with low compliance and the unit's infrastructure did not support good HH practice. The fact that healthcare professionals were more likely to do HH after tasks, suggests that they use HH to protect themselves rather than the patients. Adequate infrastructure and ongoing health education with a focus on HH while caring for patients in contact precautions are essential for improving HH compliance and patient safety.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Infección Hospitalaria , Higiene de las Manos , Humanos , Brasil/epidemiología , COVID-19/prevención & control , Estudios Prospectivos , Infección Hospitalaria/prevención & controlRESUMEN
Resumo Objetivo Verificar a adesão e a qualidade da técnica de higiene das mãos realizada por profissionais de saúde nos momentos preconizados e identificar os fatores impactantes. Métodos Estudo observacional, com 41 profissionais de Unidade de Terapia Intensiva Adulto de um hospital de ensino brasileiro. A coleta de dados foi de setembro a dezembro de 2021, utilizando questionário sociodemográfico e formulário de observação da Organização Mundial da Saúde. Foram aplicados testes estatísticos de análise binomial e modelo de regressão logística de efeitos mistos e adotou-se nível de significância de 0,05. Resultados Um total de 1.055 oportunidades de Higiene das Mãos foram observadas, a taxa de adesão foi de 23,98% e pode-se verificar que os profissionais não executaram a técnica preconizada. O teste binomial verificou maior adesão aos momentos "após" quando comparados aos momentos "antes" (p< 0,001) e foi constatado impacto negativo do uso de luvas (p< 0,001). O modelo logístico reforçou a maior adesão nos momentos "após". Ainda que a adesão esteja baixa entre todas as categorias profissionais, o modelo logístico demonstrou mais chances de higiene das mãos pelos enfermeiros. Conclusão A adesão à higiene das mãos foi consideravelmente baixa principalmente considerando a técnica adequada. Foi verificado impacto negativo do uso de luvas na adesão higiene das mãos. Os profissionais demonstraram maiores chances de aderirem a higiene das mãos nos momentos "após" quando comparados aos momentos "antes".
Resumen Objetivo Verificar la adhesión y la calidad de la técnica de higiene de manos realizada por profesionales de la salud en los momentos recomendados e identificar los factores impactantes. Métodos Estudio observacional con 41 profesionales de una unidad de cuidados intensivos adulta de un hospital universitario brasileño. La recopilación de datos se realizó de septiembre a diciembre de 2021, mediante un cuestionario sociodemográfico y un formulario de observación de la Organización Mundial de la Salud. Se aplicaron pruebas estadísticas de análisis binominal y el modelo de regresión logística de efectos mixtos, y se adoptó un nivel de significación de 0,05. Resultados Se observó un total de 1.055 oportunidades de higiene de manos. El índice de adhesión fue del 23,98 % y se pudo verificar que los profesionales no ejecutan la técnica recomendada. La prueba binominal verificó una mayor adhesión en los momentos "después" comparado con los momentos "antes" (p<0,001) y se constató un impacto negativo del uso de guantes (p<0,001). El modelo logístico reforzó la mayor adhesión en los momentos "después". Aunque la adhesión sea baja en todas las categorías profesionales, el modelo logístico demostró mayor probabilidad de higiene de manos por parte de los enfermeros. Conclusión La adhesión a la higiene de manos fue considerablemente baja, sobre todo si se considera la técnica adecuada. Se verificó un impacto negativo del uso de guantes en la adhesión a la higiene de manos. Los profesionales demostraron mayores probabilidades de adhesión a la higiene de manos en los momentos "después" comparado con los momentos "antes".
Abstract Objective To verify adherence and quality of hand hygiene techniques performed by health professionals at recommended times and identify impacting factors. Methods This is an observational study, with 41 professionals from the Adult Intensive Care Unit of a Brazilian teaching hospital. Data collection took place from September to December 2021, using a sociodemographic questionnaire and observation form from the World Health Organization. Statistical tests of binomial analysis and mixed-effects logistic regression model were applied, and a significance level of 0.05 was adopted. Results A total of 1,055 hand hygiene opportunities were observed; the adherence rate was 23.98%; and it can be seen that professionals did not perform the recommended technique. The binomial test verified greater adherence to moments "after" when compared to moments "before" (p< 0.001) and a negative impact of using gloves was found (p< 0.001). The logistical model reinforced greater adherence in moments "after". Even though adherence is low among all professional categories, the logistical model demonstrated more chances of hand hygiene by nurses. Conclusion Adherence to hand hygiene was considerably low, especially considering the appropriate technique. A negative impact of using gloves on hand hygiene adherence was verified. Professionals demonstrated greater chances of adhering to hand hygiene in the moments "after" when compared to moments "before".
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of an educational intervention on the knowledge of nursing professionals regarding standard precautions. METHODS: This is an almost experimental study conducted with 100 nursing professionals. Data collection was performed using a sociodemographic characterization instrument and the Standard Precautions Knowledge Questionnaire. The educational intervention was based on five moments, where the approach to questions with less than 70% accuracy was intensified. RESULTS: There was a significant difference between the scores of healthcare professionals before (16.20 ± 1.51) and after (16.90 ± 1.31) the educational intervention (W=3.336; p < 0.05). Regarding knowledge about hand hygiene after glove use, an increase in knowledge from 83% to 93% was obtained. CONCLUSIONS: A positive effect on the professionals' knowledge was recorded, demonstrating advances regarding the strengthening of already acquired knowledge and the understanding of new knowledge.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Higiene de las Manos , Humanos , COVID-19/prevención & control , Pandemias/prevención & control , Transfusión Sanguínea , Recolección de DatosRESUMEN
Background and objectives: does the COVID-19 Intensive Care Unit have a favorable structure to sanitize the hands of health professionals? What is the perception of health professionals about the organizational safety of that sector? It aims to assess the structure for hand hygiene in an Intensive Care Unit for patients with COVID-19 and the perception of safety attitude by health professionals. Methods: an analytical, cross-sectional study with 62 health professionals from a university hospital in the state of Mato Grosso, Brazil. The unit structure commands for hand alignment and safety attitudes were used. Results: flaws were found in the infrastructure that can hinder and prevent hand hygiene by professionals at the point of care. The safety attitude was impaired in all domains. No difference was found between the median scores regarding professional categories. Conclusion: investment is urgently needed in improving infrastructure with alcoholic preparation supply at the point of assistance. The study demonstrates the negative impact of the perception of low management involvement in patient safety actions and poor infrastructure for hand hygiene.(AU)
Justificativa e objetivos: a Unidade de Terapia Intensiva COVID-19 possui estrutura favorável para a higienização das mãos dos profissionais de saúde? Qual a percepção dos profissionais de saúde acerca da segurança organizacional do referido setor? Tem como objetivo avaliar a estrutura para higiene das mãos de uma Unidade de Terapia Intensiva destinada a pacientes com COVID-19 e a percepção da atitude de segurança pelos profissionais de saúde. Métodos: estudo analítico, transversal, com 62 profissionais de saúde de um hospital universitário do estado de Mato Grosso, Brasil. Foram utilizados os questionários de estrutura da unidade para higienização das mãos e o de atitudes de segurança. Resultados: constataram-se falhas na infraestrutura que podem dificultar e impedir a realização da higiene das mãos pelos profissionais no ponto da assistência. A atitude de segurança esteve prejudicada em todos os domínios. Não foi encontrada diferença entre as medianas dos escores com relação às categorias profissionais. Conclusão: se faz urgente o investimento na melhoria da infraestrutura com fornecimento de preparações alcoólicas no ponto da assistência. O estudo demonstra o impacto negativo da percepção do baixo envolvimento da gestão nas ações de segurança do paciente e infraestrutura precária para higiene das mãos.(AU)
Justificación y objetivos: ¿La Unidad de Cuidados Intensivos COVID-19 cuenta con una estructura favorable para la higiene de manos de los profesionales de la salud? ¿Cuál es la percepción de los profesionales de la salud sobre la seguridad organizacional en ese sector? Tiene como objetivo evaluar la estructura para la higiene de manos en una Unidad de Cuidados Intensivos destinada a pacientes con COVID-19 y la percepción de actitudes de seguridad por parte de los profesionales de la salud. Métodos: estudio transversal analítico con 62 profesionales de la salud de un hospital universitario en el estado de Mato Grosso, Brasil. Se utilizaron los comandos de la estructura de la unidad para la alineación de las manos y las actitudes de seguridad. Resultados: se encontraron fallas en la infraestructura que pueden dificultar e impedir la realización de la higiene de manos por parte de los profesionales en el punto de atención. La actitud de seguridad se vio afectada en todos los dominios. No se encontró diferencia entre las medianas de las puntuaciones con respecto a las categorías profesionales. Conclusión: urge invertir en mejorar la infraestructura con el suministro de preparados alcohólicos en el punto de atención. El estudio demuestra el impacto negativo de la percepción de una baja implicación de la dirección en las acciones de seguridad del paciente y una infraestructura deficiente para la higiene de manos.(AU)
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Percepción , Desinfección de las Manos , Personal de Salud , COVID-19 , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Infraestructura Sanitaria , Estudios Transversales , Contención de Riesgos Biológicos , Seguridad del PacienteRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to analyze the adherence to standard precautions by nursing professionals in a public university hospital, and to identify associated factors. METHODOLOGY: This was a cross-sectional study with the nursing staff of a public university hospital. The participants provided sociodemographic and immunization data, training data on standard precautions and occupational accident history, and responded to the questionnaire on adherence to standard precautions (QASP). Descriptive data analysis and Pearson's Chi-square test (χ²) were performed, followed by Fisher's exact test to verify the association between the adherence to standard precautions (total score ≥ 76 points) and the sample characterization variables. Additionally, binary logistic regression indicated the odds ratio (OR) of the sample characterization variables for adherence to standard precautions. A p value ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: The average score for adherence to standard precautions, through QASP, by nursing professionals evaluated was 70.5 points. Association between the adherence to standard precautions and the professionals' sample characterization variables was not identified. However, it was observed that experienced professionals (≥15 years of experience in the institution) were more likely to adhere to standard precautions (OR 0.062; IC95% [0.006-0.663]; p = 0.021). CONCLUSIONS: In general, the adherence to standard precautions by nursing professionals working in health service in this study can be considered inadequate, highlighting major weaknesses in hand hygiene practices, use of personal protective equipment (PPE), recapping of used needles, and conduct after suffering occupational accidents. Experienced professionals were more likely to adhere to standard precautions.
Asunto(s)
Control de Infecciones , Precauciones Universales , Humanos , Estudios Transversales , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Hospitales Universitarios , Adhesión a DirectrizRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the association between the occurrence of common mental disorders with loss of productivity and presenteeism in nursing workers at a public health service. METHOD: This is a cross-sectional study, with 291 workers from Midwestern Brazil. Data collection carried out from October 2019 to January 2020, with instruments for sociodemographic characterization, labor and health conditions: Self Reporting Questionnaire-20, Standford Presenteeism Scale and Work Limitations Questionnaire. Data were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics, with Mann-Whitney tests and logistic regression, respecting a significance level of 5%. RESULTS: The occurrence of common mental disorders was 4.27 times more likely to experience presenteeism, 10.17% of compromised overall productivity, and impairment of mental/interpersonal and production demands. CONCLUSION: The occurrence of common mental disorders was associated with presenteeism, with repercussions in loss of productivity of nursing workers.
Asunto(s)
Trastornos Mentales , Presentismo , Humanos , Estudios Transversales , Trastornos Mentales/epidemiología , Eficiencia , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , AbsentismoRESUMEN
Background: Understanding the correlation between the methods of monitoring surface cleaning and disinfection (SCD) is fundamental for better infection control. Purpose: This study aims to correlate the SCD monitoring methods in a Brazilian pediatric unit. This is an exploratory, longitudinal, and correlational study. Methods: The study was conducted in a pediatric hospitalization unit of a medium-sized hospital from December 2020 to March 2021. Four high-contact surfaces were analyzed before and after the cleaning and disinfection process by means of visual inspection, quantification of adenosine triphosphate (ATP), and colony-forming unit (CFU) count. The study consisted of three stages: stage I involving situational diagnosis of the SCD process; stage II referring to the implementation of the Surface Cleaning and Disinfection Standardization Program (SCDSP); and stage III involving long-term assessment after implementing the program. A total of 192 assessments were performed in each stage, totaling 576 in the three study stages. Conclusions: A significant correlation was found between the ATP quantification methods and microbial count in the bed railing (p = 0.009) and companion's armchair (p = 0.018) surfaces. In both cases, Spearman's correlation coefficients were positive, indicating a positive correlation between ATP and microbial count scores, that is, the higher the ATP values (in RLUs), the greater the microbial counts (in CFUs/cm2). The analysis of the ROC curves suggests that the surfaces presenting ATP below 108 RLUs can be considered approved. The ATP method yielded 78.6% sensitivity; in turn, microbial count presented a sensitivity of 85.7%. It is important to use different methods to monitor the cleaning and disinfection of surfaces, as each one has different sensitivity and specificity.
RESUMEN
ABSTRACT Objective: To evaluate the impact of an educational intervention on the knowledge of nursing professionals regarding standard precautions. Methods: This is an almost experimental study conducted with 100 nursing professionals. Data collection was performed using a sociodemographic characterization instrument and the Standard Precautions Knowledge Questionnaire. The educational intervention was based on five moments, where the approach to questions with less than 70% accuracy was intensified. Results: There was a significant difference between the scores of healthcare professionals before (16.20 ± 1.51) and after (16.90 ± 1.31) the educational intervention (W=3.336; p < 0.05). Regarding knowledge about hand hygiene after glove use, an increase in knowledge from 83% to 93% was obtained. Conclusions: A positive effect on the professionals' knowledge was recorded, demonstrating advances regarding the strengthening of already acquired knowledge and the understanding of new knowledge.
RESUMEN Objetivo: Evaluar el impacto de una intervención educativa en el conocimiento de los profesionales de enfermería sobre las precauciones estándar. Métodos: Este es un estudio cuasiexperimental realizado con 100 profesionales de enfermería. Para la recopilación de datos, se utilizaron un instrumento de caracterización sociodemográfica y el cuestionario de Conocimiento de las Precauciones Estándar. La intervención educativa se basó en cinco momentos, en los cuales se intensificó el abordaje de cuestiones con menos del 70% de aciertos. Resultados: Hubo una diferencia significativa entre las puntuaciones de los profesionales de salud antes (16,20 ± 1,51) y después (16,90 ± 1,31) de la intervención educativa (W = 3,336; p <0,05). En relación con el conocimiento sobre la higiene de las manos después del uso de guantes, se obtuvo un aumento en el conocimiento del 83% al 93%. Conclusiones: Se registró un efecto positivo en el conocimiento de los profesionales, demostrando avances en cuanto al fortalecimiento de los conocimientos ya adquiridos y la comprensión de nuevos saberes.
RESUMO Objetivo: avaliar o impacto de uma intervenção educativa no conhecimento dos profissionais de enfermagem em relação às precauções padrão. Métodos: trata-se de um estudo quase-experimental, realizada com 100 profissionais de enfermagem. Para a coleta de dados, foram utilizados o instrumento de caracterização sociodemográfica e o questionário de Conhecimento das Precauções-Padrão. A intervenção educativa foi baseada em 05 momentos, onde se intensificou a abordagem em questões com menos de 70% de acerto. Resultados: Houve diferença significativa entre os escores dos profissionais de saúde antes (16,20 ± 1,51) e após (16,90 ± 1,31) a intervenção educativa (W=3,336; p < 0,05). Em relação ao conhecimento sobre a higiene das mãos após uso de luvas, obteve-se um aumento no conhecimento de 83% para 93%. Conclusões: registrou-se efeito positivo no conhecimento dos profissionais, demonstrando avanços no que diz respeito ao fortalecimento dos conhecimentos já adquiridos e à compreensão de novos saberes.
RESUMEN
ABSTRACT Objectives: to verify the social, work and health factors that may affect the quality of work life of nursing professionals who work in hospital environments. Method: this is a cross-sectional study, carried out at a public hospital in Cuiabá-MT. The sample included 486 nursing workers, 103 nurses and 383 nursing technicians and assistants. The sociodemographic, professional and health and the Total Quality of Work Life (TQWL-42) questionnaires were used. Descriptive and inferential statistical analysis was carried out. Results: in the general classification of quality of work life, 33% of nurses and 29.2% of high school-level workers were dissatisfied. A higher quality of work life was associated with aspects of physical and mental disposition, ability to work, care from health/social assistance services, rest time and aspects of freedom of expression, interpersonal relationships, autonomy and leisure time. The lowest means were related to nursing professionals who work 40 hours per week. Conclusion: the results revealed that several factors are linked to a reduced perceived quality of work life among nursing professionals. Among these factors, the nature of occupational responsibilities, the weekly working hours and the remuneration received stand out. These elements were identified as significant influences on the quality of work life of these professionals.
RESUMEN Objetivos: verificar los factores sociales, laborales y de salud que pueden afectar la calidad de vida en el trabajo de los profesionales de enfermería que actúan en el ambiente hospitalario. Métodos: estudio transversal, realizado en un hospital público de Cuiabá-MT. La muestra estuvo compuesta por 486 trabajadores de enfermería, 103 enfermeros y 383 técnicos y auxiliares de enfermería. Se utilizaron los cuestionarios sociodemográficos, profesionales y de salud y el Total Quality of Work Life (TQWL-42). Se realizó análisis estadístico descriptivo e inferencial. Resultados: en la clasificación general de Calidad de Vida en el Trabajo, el 33% de las enfermeras y el 29,2% de los trabajadores de nivel medio se mostraron insatisfechos. Una mayor Calidad de Vida en el Trabajo se asoció con aspectos de disposición física y mental, capacidad para trabajar, asistencia de los servicios de asistencia sanitaria/social, tiempo de descanso y aspectos de libertad de expresión, relaciones interpersonales, autonomía y tiempo libre. Los promedios más bajos estuvieron relacionados con los profesionales de enfermería que trabajan 40 horas semanales. Conclusión: Los resultados revelaron que varios factores están relacionados con una percepción reducida de la Calidad de Vida en el Trabajo entre los profesionales de enfermería. Entre estos factores destacan la naturaleza de las responsabilidades laborales, la jornada semanal de trabajo y la remuneración recibida. Estos elementos fueron identificados como influencias significativas en la Calidad de Vida en el Trabajo de estos profesionales.
RESUMO Objetivos: verificar os fatores sociais, laborais e de saúde que possam afetar a qualidade de vida no trabalho dos profissionais de enfermagem que atuam no ambiente hospitalar. Método: estudo transversal, realizado em um hospital público de Cuiabá-MT. A amostra contou com 486 trabalhadores de enfermagem, 103 enfermeiros e 383 técnicos e auxiliares de enfermagem. Foram utilizados os questionários: sociodemográfico, profissional e de saúde; e o Total Quality of Work Life - TQWL-42. Procedeu-se à análise estatística descritiva e inferencial. Resultados: na classificação geral de Qualidade de Vida no Trabalho, 33%, dos enfermeiros e 29,2%, dos trabalhadores de nível médio se mostraram insatisfeitos. Uma maior Qualidade de Vida no Trabalho esteve associada aos aspectos de disposição física e mental, capacidade para o trabalho, assistência de serviços de saúde/assistência social, tempo de repouso e os aspectos de liberdade de expressão, relações interpessoais, autonomia e tempo de lazer. As menores médias estiveram relacionadas aos profissionais da enfermagem que cumprem jornada semanal de trabalho de 40 horas. Conclusão: os resultados revelaram que diversos fatores estão vinculados a uma percepção reduzida da Qualidade de Vida no Trabalho dos profissionais da enfermagem. Entre esses fatores, destacam-se a natureza das responsabilidades ocupacionais, a carga horaria semanal de trabalho e a remuneração recebida. Estes elementos foram identificados como influências significativas na Qualidade de Vida no Trabalho desses profissionais.
RESUMEN
ABSTRACT Objective: To investigate the association between the occurrence of common mental disorders with loss of productivity and presenteeism in nursing workers at a public health service. Method: This is a cross-sectional study, with 291 workers from Midwestern Brazil. Data collection carried out from October 2019 to January 2020, with instruments for sociodemographic characterization, labor and health conditions: Self Reporting Questionnaire-20, Standford Presenteeism Scale and Work Limitations Questionnaire. Data were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics, with Mann-Whitney tests and logistic regression, respecting a significance level of 5%. Results: The occurrence of common mental disorders was 4.27 times more likely to experience presenteeism, 10.17% of compromised overall productivity, and impairment of mental/interpersonal and production demands. Conclusion: The occurrence of common mental disorders was associated with presenteeism, with repercussions in loss of productivity of nursing workers.
RESUMEN Objetivo: Investigar la asociación entre la ocurrencia de trastornos mentales comunes con pérdida de productividad y presentismo en trabajadores de enfermería de un servicio público de salud. Método: Estudio transversal, con 291 trabajadores de la región Centro-Oeste de Brasil. Recolección de datos realizada de octubre de 2019 a enero de 2020, con instrumentos de caracterización sociodemográfica, condiciones laborales y de salud: Self Reporting Questionnaire-20, Standford Presenteeism Scale y Work Limitations Questionnaire. Los datos fueron analizados mediante estadística descriptiva e inferencial, con pruebas de Mann-Whitney y regresión logística, respetando un nivel de significación del 5%. Resultados: La ocurrencia de trastornos mentales comunes fue 4,27 veces más probable de experimentar presentismo, con 10,17% de la productividad general comprometida y daños en las demandas mentales/interpersonales y de producción. Conclusión: La ocurrencia de trastornos mentales comunes se asoció al presentismo, con repercusiones en la pérdida de productividad de los trabajadores de enfermería.
RESUMO Objetivo: Investigar a associação entre a ocorrência de transtornos mentais comuns com a perda de produtividade e o presenteísmo em trabalhadores de enfermagem de um serviço de saúde público. Método: Estudo transversal, com 291 trabalhadores da região Centro-oeste do Brasil. Coleta de dados realizada de outubro de 2019 a janeiro de 2020, com instrumentos para caracterização sociodemográfica, condições laborais e de saúde: Self Reporting Questionnaire-20, Standford Presenteeism Scale e Work Limitations Questionnaire. Os dados foram analisados por estatística descritiva e inferencial, com Testes de Mann-Whitney e regressão logística, respeitando o nível de significância de 5%. Resultados: A ocorrência de transtornos mentais comuns apresentou chances 4,27 maiores para vivenciar o presenteísmo, com 10,17% da produtividade geral comprometida e prejuízos para as demandas mental/interpessoal e de produção. Conclusão: A ocorrência de transtornos mentais comuns esteve associada ao presenteísmo, com repercussões em perda de produtividade dos trabalhadores de enfermagem.
Asunto(s)
Salud Laboral , Enfermería , Trastornos Mentales , Eficiencia Organizacional , PresentismoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Standard precautions (SPs) are recommended safety measures for healthcare professionals to follow, with a view to preventing healthcare-related infections (HCRIs) and for their own protection. Inadequate adherence to these measures can lead to occurrences of occupational accidents and HCRIs. OBJECTIVES: To ascertain the knowledge of and adherence to SP measures among the nursing staff of a hemodialysis service and the relationship of these variables to occurrences of work accidents with biological material. DESIGN AND SETTING: Descriptive cross-sectional and correlational study with a quantitative approach developed in a hemodialysis clinic in Minas Gerais. METHODS: Data were collected through sociodemographic questionnaires and questionnaires on knowledge of and adherence to SPs. RESULTS: 29 professionals participated in the study. It is noteworthy that all of them had already participated in training related to SPs. However, no relationship was identified between knowledge of (15.17 points) and adherence to (71.86 points) SPs. In addition, inferential analysis showed that there was a relationship between suffering a work accident with biological material and the sociodemographic data and knowledge of and adherence to standard precautions. CONCLUSION: Knowledge of the SPs that had been established did not mean mastery of the subject. Despite positive results regarding adherence, factors requiring improvement were observed. It was possible to infer the characteristics that gave rise to greater risk of occurrences of accidents at work. Thus, this study showed the importance of assessing knowledge of and adherence to SP, in order to optimize and direct continuing education towards resolving occupational exposure.
Asunto(s)
Adhesión a Directriz , Unidades de Hemodiálisis en Hospital , Estudios Transversales , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Humanos , Control de Infecciones/métodos , Diálisis Renal , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
Abstract BACKGROUND: Standard precautions (SPs) are recommended safety measures for healthcare professionals to follow, with a view to preventing healthcare-related infections (HCRIs) and for their own protection. Inadequate adherence to these measures can lead to occurrences of occupational accidents and HCRIs. OBJECTIVES: To ascertain the knowledge of and adherence to SP measures among the nursing staff of a hemodialysis service and the relationship of these variables to occurrences of work accidents with biological material. DESIGN AND SETTING: Descriptive cross-sectional and correlational study with a quantitative approach developed in a hemodialysis clinic in Minas Gerais. METHODS: Data were collected through sociodemographic questionnaires and questionnaires on knowledge of and adherence to SPs. RESULTS: 29 professionals participated in the study. It is noteworthy that all of them had already participated in training related to SPs. However, no relationship was identified between knowledge of (15.17 points) and adherence to (71.86 points) SPs. In addition, inferential analysis showed that there was a relationship between suffering a work accident with biological material and the sociodemographic data and knowledge of and adherence to standard precautions. CONCLUSION: Knowledge of the SPs that had been established did not mean mastery of the subject. Despite positive results regarding adherence, factors requiring improvement were observed. It was possible to infer the characteristics that gave rise to greater risk of occurrences of accidents at work. Thus, this study showed the importance of assessing knowledge of and adherence to SP, in order to optimize and direct continuing education towards resolving occupational exposure.
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Adhesión a Directriz , Unidades de Hemodiálisis en Hospital , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Estudios Transversales , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Diálisis Renal , Control de Infecciones/métodosRESUMEN
ABSTRACT Objective: to analyze factors associated with presenteeism in nursing workers with sociodemographic variables, health and work conditions, productivity and musculoskeletal symptoms. Methods: this is a cross-sectional, descriptive and analytical study, with 306 nursing workers from a hospital and municipal emergency room in a Brazilian capital. The Stanford Presenteeism Scale, the Work Limitations Questionnaire, the Nordic Musculoskeletal Questionnaire and a demographic questionnaire on nursing professionals' working conditions and health were used. Bivariate and multivariate analyzes were performed, respecting a significance level of 5%. Results: presenteeism was found in 43.8% of professionals and significant associations with CLT work (p=0.002), workplace - Intensive Care Units (p=0.008), physical exercise twice a week (p=0.008), presence of musculoskeletal symptoms, with low back pain being representative (p=0.001). The productivity loss was 8.8. Conclusions: the study confirms a high rate of presenteeism among nursing workers.
RESUMEN Objetivo: analizar factores asociados al presentismo en trabajadores de enfermería con variables sociodemográficas, condiciones de salud y trabajo, productividad y síntomas musculoesqueléticos. Métodos: estudio transversal, descriptivo y analítico, con 306 trabajadores de enfermería de un hospital y urgencias municipales de una capital brasileña. Se utilizo el Stanford Presenteeism Scale, el Work Limitations Questionnaire, el Cuestionario Nórdico Musculoesquelético y un cuestionario demográfico sobre las condiciones laborales y de salud de los profesionales de enfermería. Realizaron análisis bivariados y multivariados, respetando un nivel de significancia del 5%. Resultados: se encontró presentismo en el 43,8% de los profesionales y asociaciones significativas con el régimen de trabajo celetista (p=0,002), lugar de trabajo - Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos (p=0,008), ejercicio físico dos veces por semana (p=0,008), presencia de musculoesquelético síntomas, siendo la lumbalgia representativa (p=0,001). La pérdida de productividad fue de 8.8. Conclusiones: el estudio confirma una alta tasa de presentismo entre los trabajadores de enfermería.
RESUMO Objetivo: analisar fatores associados ao presenteísmo em trabalhadores de enfermagem com variáveis sociodemográficas, condições de saúde e trabalho, produtividade e sintomas osteomusculares. Métodos: estudo transversal, descritivo e analítico, com 306 trabalhadores de enfermagem de um hospital e pronto-socorro municipal de uma capital brasileira. Utilizaram-se o Stanford Presenteeism Scale, o Work Limitations Questionnaire, o Questionário Nórdico de Sintomas Osteomusculares e um questionário demográfico de condições de trabalho e saúde dos profissionais de enfermagem. Realizaram análises bivariadas e multivariadas, respeitando um nível de significância de 5%. Resultados: o presenteísmo foi constatado em 43,8% dos profissionais e associações significativas com o regime de trabalho celetista (p=0,002), local de trabalho - Unidades de Terapia Intensiva (p=0,008), prática de exercícios físicos 2 vezes por semana (p=0,008), presença de sintomas osteomusculares, sendo a dor lombar representativa (p=0,001). A perda de produtividade foi de 8,8. Conclus ões : o estudo confirma alto índice de presenteísmo entre trabalhadores de enfermagem.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: to analyze factors associated with presenteeism in nursing workers with sociodemographic variables, health and work conditions, productivity and musculoskeletal symptoms. METHODS: this is a cross-sectional, descriptive and analytical study, with 306 nursing workers from a hospital and municipal emergency room in a Brazilian capital. The Stanford Presenteeism Scale, the Work Limitations Questionnaire, the Nordic Musculoskeletal Questionnaire and a demographic questionnaire on nursing professionals' working conditions and health were used. Bivariate and multivariate analyzes were performed, respecting a significance level of 5%. RESULTS: presenteeism was found in 43.8% of professionals and significant associations with CLT work (p=0.002), workplace - Intensive Care Units (p=0.008), physical exercise twice a week (p=0.008), presence of musculoskeletal symptoms, with low back pain being representative (p=0.001). The productivity loss was 8.8. CONCLUSIONS: the study confirms a high rate of presenteeism among nursing workers.
Asunto(s)
Ejercicio Físico , Presentismo , Brasil , Estudios Transversales , HumanosRESUMEN
Background and objectives: Healthcare-associated Infections are a global health concern. Although the best strategy for its prevention is hand hygiene (HH), there is still low compliance by health professionals in the execution of the correct technique. In order to improve compliance with HH, the World Health Organization (WHO) implemented the multimodal strategy, which emphasizes patient participation in health services, in order to encourage professionals to wash their hands. With this, we sought to verify the impact of the implementation of educational strategies with patient involvement and participation in compliance with hand hygiene by health professionals. Methods: An integrative literature review in the CINAHL, LILACS, PubMed, Scopus and WOS databases. Results: The present sample comprised eight international studies that empowered patient participation with intervention strategies on HH and studies in which patients provided feedback on compliance assessment, which reflected in greater compliance with HH by health professionals. Conclusion: Educational interventions with patient participation and involvement proved to be effective for health professionals to comply with HH, especially when all components of the multimodal strategy were adequately addressed.(AU)
Justificativa e objetivos: As infecções relacionadas à assistência à saúde são um problema de saúde mundial. Embora a melhor estratégia para sua prevenção seja a higiene das mãos (HM), nota-se ainda baixa adesão dos profissionais de saúde na execução da técnica correta. Com o propósito de melhorar a adesão a HM, a Organização Mundial de Saúde (OMS) implementou a estratégia multimodal, que ressalta a participação do paciente nos serviços de saúde, a fim de incentivarem os profissionais a higienizar as mãos. Com isso, buscamos verificar o impacto da implementação de estratégias educativas com o envolvimento e participação do paciente na adesão à higienize das mãos por profissionais de saúde. Métodos: Revisão integrativa da literatura nas bases de dados CINAHL, LILACS, PubMed, Scopus e WOS. Resultados: Compuseram a presente amostra oito estudos internacionais, que empoderaram a participação do paciente com estratégias de intervenção sobre HM e estudos no qual o paciente foi provedor de feedback de avaliação da adesão, o que refletiu em maior adesão à HM pelos profissionais de saúde. Conclusão: Intervenções educativas com a participação e envolvimento do paciente se mostraram eficazes para adesão à HM pelos profissionais de saúde, em especial, quando todos os componentes da estratégia multimodal foram adequadamente contemplados.(AU)
Justificación y objetivos: Las infecciones relacionadas con la asistencia sanitaria son un problema de salud mundial. Aunque la mejor estrategia para su prevención es la higiene de manos (HM), aún existe una baja adherencia por parte de los profesionales sanitarios en la ejecución de la técnica correcta. Para mejorar la adherencia a la HM, la Organización Mundial de la Salud (OMS) implementó la estrategia multimodal, que enfatiza la participación del paciente en los servicios de salud, con el fin de incentivar a los profesionales a lavarse las manos. Con esto, buscamos verificar el impacto de la implementación de estrategias educativas con la implicación y participación del paciente en la adherencia a la higiene de manos por parte de los profesionales sanitarios. Métodos: Revisión integradora de la literatura en las bases de datos CINAHL, LILACS, PubMed, Scopus y WOS. Resultados: La presente muestra estuvo conformada por ocho estudios internacionales que empoderaron la participación del paciente con estrategias de intervención en HM y estudios en los que el paciente brindó retroalimentación sobre la evaluación de la adherencia, lo que se reflejó en una mayor adherencia a la HM por parte de los profesionales de salud. Conclusión: Las intervenciones educativas con participación e involucramiento del paciente demostraron ser efectivas para que los profesionales de la salud se adhieran a la HM, especialmente cuando todos los componentes de la estrategia multimodal se abordaron adecuadamente.(AU)
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Participación del Paciente , Personal de Salud , Higiene de las Manos , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Control de Infecciones/métodosAsunto(s)
Posmenopausia , Sexualidad , Femenino , Humanos , Psicometría , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Conducta Sexual , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to monitor adherence to hand hygiene by health professionals working in critical sections and to assess the factors that influenced adherence, such as physical structure of the units, use of procedure gloves, employment bond of the worker, and perception of patient safety climate. METHODOLOGY: Observational and correlational study carried out in critical areas of a university hospital in the Midwest region of Brazil. RESULTS: The overall hand hygiene adherence rate was 46.2% (n = 3,025). Adherence was higher among nurses 59.8% (n = 607) than among nursing technicians (p < 0.001), and the section with the greatest adherence was the neonatal Intensive Care Unit 62.9% (n = 947) (p < 0.001). Unlike the neonatal unit, in the adult unit the dispensers of alcohol-based handrubs were poorly located, without arms reach, and the taps were manual. In this section, a greater frequency of procedure glove use was also observed, 90.6% (n = 536), as compared to the other sections (p < 0.001). Regarding safety climate perception, temporary employees had higher means as compared to regular employees (p = 0.0375). CONCLUSIONS: Hand hygiene adherence was affected and/or influenced by the physical structure, use of procedure gloves, work regime, and patient safety climate.