Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39247566

RESUMEN

Tourette syndrome (TS) affects about 0.5% of the population worldwide, but only sparse and conflicting data exist on TS prevalence among minority samples. Here we used VISIT-TS (a survey preceded by a short video showing tic phenomenology) and community outreach to provide estimates of tic disorder prevalence in African Americans. Community health workers (CHWs) left flyers at households in a predominantly minority neighborhood and approached people at a community health fair. Of 606 such contacts, 222 individuals agreed to discuss the study. Of these, 70% enrolled, of whom 82% identified as Black and 64% female. The VISIT-TS was well received. Lifetime prevalence of TS or another chronic tic disorder (TS/CTD) was 3.2%, and 31% endorsed any lifetime simple tic. The number of enrolled Black participants is remarkable compared to earlier TS studies, allowing one of the first prevalence estimates in this population (TS 2.3%, TS/CTD 3.9%). Tic disorders were endorsed only by Black respondents, though the small White sample precluded statistical comparison. Women had higher rates than men of TS (M:F = 0:1) and of any lifetime simple tic (M:F = 0.85), differing significantly from the expected 4:1 ratio (p = .009 and p < .001, respectively). For TS/CTD the ratio was 1.2:1 (p > .15). We conclude that VISIT-TS is a feasible tic screening tool in a minority population, that CHW community outreach increases enrollment of Black participants, that TS/CTD is no less common in this population, and that tics were as common in female as in male respondents.

2.
J Am Coll Surg ; 230(1): 161-167.e4, 2020 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31730807

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In recent years, several states have enacted Stand Your Ground (SYG) legislation intended to deter crime. To date, the impact of these laws on justifiable homicide (JH) and homicide (HOM) is unknown. This study was designed to compare JH and HOM rates (JHR, HR) before and after enactment of SYG laws and in states with and without (NoSYG) such legislation. STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective analysis of justifiable homicide and homicide using 3 United States datasets from 2000 to 2017. Descriptive statistics and univariate linear regressions were used to evaluate the association of SYG laws and JH and HOM in the United States. RESULTS: There were 4,594 incidents of JH and 214,630 incidents of HOM in the United States between 2000 and 2017. Stand Your Ground states accounted for most JH and HOM incidents 3,184 (69%) and 116,511 (54%), respectively. Stand Your Ground states had higher JH and HOM rates than NoSYG states (0.126 vs 0.047 and 4.663 vs 3.301 per 100,000 population, respectively; p < 0.001). Comparing periods pre- (2000 to 2004) and post-SYG (2005 to 2017) law enactment, SYG vs NoSYG states had increased JH rates of 54.9% vs 20.4%, respectively (p < 0.001); HOM rates increased 10.8% in SYG states and decreased 2.3% in NoSYG states (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Stand Your Ground states had significantly higher JH and HOM rates and significantly greater increases in JH and HOM rates pre- vs post-SYG law enactment compared with NoSYG states. These results raise questions about the potential adverse consequences of policies such as the SYG law in the US.


Asunto(s)
Armas de Fuego/legislación & jurisprudencia , Homicidio/legislación & jurisprudencia , Homicidio/estadística & datos numéricos , Políticas de Control Social , Control Social Formal , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA