RESUMEN
Tarsometatarsal joint arthrodesis is a commonly accepted procedure for hallux valgus associated with severe deformity and first ray hypermobility or medial column instability. This study evaluates the correction of hallux valgus deformity and the maintenance of correction with and without the use of a stabilization screw between the first and second metatarsal bases. Through retrospective review of first tarsometatarsal joint arthrodesis within our institution we evaluated 63 patients. Twenty-seven patients did not have a first to second metatarsal base screw and were placed into the no screw cohort. Thirty-six patients did have a first to second metatarsal base screw and were placed into the screw cohort. This study population had an osseous union rate of 95%. Clinical and radiographic recurrence occurred in 5 of 63 patients (8%). At 1-y postop the measurements demonstrated that the screw cohort had an average intermetatarsal angle correction of 11.6 degrees while the no screw cohort had an average correction of 7.8 degrees. Additionally, at 1-y postop the screw cohort had greater maintenance of the intermetatarsal angle correction with an average change of 0.5 degrees compared to 2.3 degrees in the no screw cohort. We conclude that the addition of the stabilization screw improves the first tarsometatarsal joint arthrodesis construct resulting in a greater degree of realignment and maintenance of correction.
RESUMEN
Utilization of the talonavicular joint (TN) arthrodesis as an isolated procedure or in combination with hindfoot arthrodesis has been described in the literature for treatment of numerous hindfoot conditions. When used in isolation or with concomitant hindfoot arthrodesis, the TN joint has demonstrated nonunion rates reported as high as 37% in the literature. Despite previous research, there remains a lack of agreement upon the ideal fixation technique for TN joint arthrodesis with and without concomitant subtalar joint arthrodesis. The purpose of this study was to retrospectively compare the radiographic and clinical results of TN joint arthrodesis as part of double arthrodesis procedure utilizing 4 separate fixation constructs in the treatment of advanced hindfoot malalignment in stage III adult-acquired flatfoot deformity. We retrospectively reviewed 105 patients who underwent TN joint arthrodesis as part of double arthrodesis procedure utilizing 4 separate fixation constructs. Our results demonstrated a nonunion rate of 16.2%, with 17 nonunions identified within our patient population. One (2.4%) nonunion was observed in the 3-screw cohort, 7 (33.3%) nonunions were observed in the 2-screw cohort, 4 (16.0%) nonunions were observed in the 2-screw plus plate cohort, and 5 (29.4%) nonunions were observed in the 1-screw plus plate cohort. The difference in nonunion rate between the 4 cohorts was statistically significant. Based on these results, we conclude that the use of a 3-screw construct for TN joint arthrodesis as part of double arthrodesis procedure demonstrates a statistically significant reduction in nonunion rate and should be considered a superior fixation construct for this procedure.
Asunto(s)
Pie Plano , Articulaciones Tarsianas , Adulto , Artrodesis/métodos , Tornillos Óseos , Pie Plano/diagnóstico por imagen , Pie Plano/cirugía , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Articulaciones Tarsianas/diagnóstico por imagen , Articulaciones Tarsianas/cirugíaRESUMEN
Forefoot varus develops as a result of longstanding adult-acquired flatfoot deformity (AAFD). This occurs with varying degrees of deformity and flexibility. Residual forefoot varus following hindfoot realignment in AAFD can lead to lateral column loading and a persistent pronatory moment in efforts to reestablish contact between the forefoot and the ground. The Cotton osteotomy may serve as a reasonable adjunct procedure to help avoid complications and poor outcomes associated with residual forefoot varus in patients undergoing hindfoot arthrodesis for stage III AAFD. The aim of this study was to compare the radiographic outcomes in patients undergoing isolated hindfoot arthrodesis to patients undergoing hindfoot arthrodesis with adjunctive cotton osteotomy. We retrospectively reviewed 47 patients matched based upon age, sex, and comorbidities who underwent hindfoot reconstruction for the treatment of stage III AAFD between 2015 and 2019. A retrospective radiographic review was performed on standard weightbearing radiographs including anterior-posterior and lateral views preoperatively, postoperatively at the initiation of full weightbearing, and at final follow-up. Statistical analysis utilizing paired t test to calculate p values where <.05 was statistically significant. At final follow-up, radiographic measurements showed statistically significant differences in CAA, calcaneal inclination, talo-calcaneal, and talar tilt (p value <.05). The Cotton osteotomy group showed a quicker return to presurgical activity level and a decreased incident of tibiotalar valgus. Our study suggests that the Cotton osteotomy can address residual forefoot varus and potentially prevent further progression of ankle valgus in AAFD when used in combination with hindfoot arthrodesis.
Asunto(s)
Pie Plano , Adulto , Artrodesis/métodos , Pie Plano/complicaciones , Pie Plano/diagnóstico por imagen , Pie Plano/cirugía , Humanos , Osteotomía/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Subtalar joint (STJ) arthrodesis is a well-established and accepted surgical procedure utilized for the treatment of various hindfoot conditions including primary or posttraumatic subtalar osteoarthritis, hindfoot valgus deformity, hindfoot varus deformity, complex acute calcaneal fracture, symptomatic residual congenital deformity, tarsal coalition, and other conditions causing pain and deformity about the hindfoot. Union rates associated with isolated subtalar joint arthrodesis are generally thought to be favorable, though reports have varied significantly, with non-union rates ranging from 0 to 46%. Various fixation constructs have been recommended for STJ arthrodesis. The purpose of this study was to compare radiographic union in a 2-screw fixation technique to a 3-screw fixation technique for patients undergoing primary isolated STJ arthrodesis. To this end, we retrospectively reviewed 54 patients; 26 in the 2-screw group and 28 in the 3-screw group. We found the median time to radiographic union to be 9 weeks for the 2-screw cohort and 7 weeks for the 3-screw cohort. Additionally, we found that the 2-screw fixation cohort had a radiographic non-union rate of 26.9% while the 3-screw cohort had no non-unions. We conclude that the use of a 3-screw construct for isolated STJ arthrodesis has a lower non-union rate and time to union when compared to the traditional 2-screw construct and should be considered as a fixation option for STJ arthrodesis.