RESUMEN
Objetivo: Determinar las estrategias más adecuadas para la prevención y tratamiento de los efectos adversos agudos más frecuentes con el uso de Antipsicóticos. Método: Se elaboró una guía de práctica clínica bajo los lineamientos de la Guía Metodológica del Ministerio de Salud y Protección Social para identificar, sintetizar, evaluar la evidencia y formular recomendaciones respecto al manejo y seguimiento de los pacientes adultos con diagnóstico de esquizofrenia. Se realizó una búsqueda sistemática de la literatura de novo. Se presentó la evidencia y su graduación al grupo desarrollador de la guía (GDG) para la formulación de las recomendaciones siguiendo la metodología propuesta por el abordaje GRADE. Resultados: Resultados: Las intervenciones no farmacológicas tales como los consejos nutricionales por nutricionista, el ejercicio y la psicoterapia son efectivas para prevenir la ganancia de peso con el uso de antipsicóticos (disminución de peso en kg DM -3.05 [-4.16, -1.94]). La estrategia de cambio de antipsicótico fue efectiva para demostrar disminución de peso e IMC con el paso de olanzapina a aripiprazol (disminución del peso en kg DM -3.21 [-9.03; -2.61]). El uso de betabloqueadores comparado con placebo, usando como desenlace la reducción del 50% de los síntomas de acatisia, no mostró ser efectivo en la reducción de la acatisia inducida por antipsicóticos con un RR de 1.4 (0.59, 1.83). Conclusión: En esta evaluación se recomienda realizar acompan amiento psicoterapéutico y por nutrición para el manejo del sobrepeso en pacientes en tratamiento farmacológico. En caso de que estas alternativas no sean efectivas se sugiere cambiar el antipsicótico a uno con menor riesgo de presentar incremento de peso o considerar el inicio de metformina. Para el manejo de acatisia inducida por medicamentos se recomienda la disminución de la dosis del medicamento y la adición de benzodiacepinas tipo lorazepam. No se recomienda el uso de betabloqueadores.
Objective: To determine the most adequate strategies for the prevention and treatment of the acute adverse effects of the use of antipsychotics. Methods: A clinical practice guideline was elaborated under the parameters of the Methodological Guide of the Ministerio de Salud y Protección Social to identify, synthesize and evaluate the evidence and make recommendations about the treatment and follow-up of adult patients with schizophrenia. A systematic literature search was carried out. The evidence was presented to the Guideline Developing Group and recommendations, employing the GRADE system, were produced. Results: The non-pharmacological interventions such as nutritional counseling by a nutritionist, exercise and psychotherapy are effective in preventing weight gain with the use of antipsychotics. (Kg Weight reduction in DM of −3.05 (−4.16, −1.94)). The antipsychotic change from olanzapine to aripiprazole showed weight loss and decreased BMI (decreased weight in KG DM −3.21 (−9.03, −2.61). The use of beta blockers was ineffective in reducing akathisia induced by antipsychotic; using as outcome the 50% reduction of symptoms of akathisia comparing beta-blockers with placebo RR was 1.4 (0.59, 1.83). Conclusion: It is recommended to make psychotherapeutic accompaniment and nutrition management of overweight for patients with weight gain. If these alternatives are ineffective is suggested to change the antipsychotic or consider starting metformin. For the management of drug-induced akathisia it is recommended to decrease the dose of the drug and the addition of lorazepam. It is recommended using 5 mg biperiden IM or trihexyphenidyl 5 mg orally in case of secondary acute dystonia and for the treatment of antipsychotic-induced parkinsonism to decrease the dose of antipsychotic or consider using 2 -4 mg/day of biperiden or diphenhydramine 50 mg once daily.
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Esquizofrenia , Antipsicóticos , Pacientes , Terapéutica , Preparaciones Farmacéuticas , Pérdida de Peso , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , NutricionistasRESUMEN
Objetivos: Determinar cuál es la intervención farmacológica más efectiva y las recomendaciones para la toma de decisiones en el manejo de adultos con diagnóstico de esquizofrenia que presentan conducta violenta o agitación. Método: Se elaboró una guía de práctica clínica bajo los lineamientos de la Guía Metodológica del Ministerio de Salud y Protección Social para identificar, sintetizar, evaluar la evidencia y formular recomendaciones respecto al manejo y seguimiento de los pacientes adultos con diagnóstico de esquizofrenia. Se adoptó y actualizó la evidencia de la guía NICE 82. Se presentó la evidencia y su graduación al grupo desarrollador de la guía (GDG) para la formulación de las recomendaciones siguiendo la metodología propuesta por el abordaje GRADE. Resultados: Se recomienda el uso de medicamentos parenterales en todo paciente agitado que no responda a las medidas de persuasión. Los medicamentos con mejor evidencia con respecto a efectividad (control de conducta violenta) son haloperidol y benzodiacepinas, administradas de manera conjunta o individual, la olanzapina también es una opción teniendo en cuenta que solamente se debe usar en instituciones donde hay psiquiatra disponible 24 horas y la ziprasidona se puede considerar como un medicamento de segunda línea. No hay evidencia suficiente y las disponible es de baja calidad, con respecto a efectos secundarios asociados a la olanzapina y ziprasidona. Conclusión: La conducta violenta en los adultos con diagnóstico de esquizofrenia representa un riesgo para ellos mismos y para quienes están a su alrededor, por lo cual se hace necesaria la implementación oportuna de intervenciones dirigidas a tranquilizar al paciente, con el fin de prevenir desenlaces potencialmente negativos. Se recomienda al clínico iniciar estas intervenciones con medidas verbales de persuasión, que en caso de no ser efectivas, es apropiado el uso de medicamentos parenterales: haloperidol y benzodiacepinas como primera linea y olanzapina y ziprasidona como segundas opciones.
Objectives: To determine the most effective pharmacological intervention and to bring recommendations for decision-making in the management of adults with schizophrenia with violent behavior or agitation. Methods: A clinical practice guideline was elaborated under the parameters of the Methodological Guide of the Ministerio de Salud y Protección Social to identify, synthesize and evaluate the evidence and make recommendations about the treatment and follow-up of adult patients with schizophrenia. The evidence of NICE guide 82 was adopted and updated. The evidence was presented to the Guideline Developing Group and recommendations, employing the GRADE system, were produced. Results: It is recommended the use of parenteral drugs in all agitated patient who does not respond to the measures of persuasion. The drugs with better evidence on effectiveness (control of violent behavior) are haloperidol and benzodiazepines, administered jointly or individually. Olanzapine is also an option considering that should only be used in institutions where a psychiatrist is available 24 hours. Ziprasidone can be considered as a second-line drug. The information about the side effects associated with these drugs is insufficient and has low quality. Conclusion: Violent behavior in adults with schizophrenia represents a risk for themselves and for those around them, so the opportune implementation of interventions aimed to calm the patient, in order to prevent potential negative outcomes is necessary. It is recommended to initiate these interventions with measures of verbal persuasion, and if these measures are not effective, appropriate use of parenteral drugs: haloperidol and benzodiazepines as first-line and olanzapine and ziprasidone as second choices.
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Esquizofrenia , Psiquiatría , Terapéutica , Antipsicóticos , Preparaciones Farmacéuticas , Guía de Práctica Clínica , Cuidados Posteriores , Conducta Compulsiva , AgresiónRESUMEN
Introducción: Colombia se encuentra en estos momentos en la realización de guías de práctica clínica para el tratamiento de diversas patologías. Las guías de práctica clínica representan una herramienta al alcance del clínico para la toma de decisiones sobre sus pacientes. En psiquiatría se dispone internacionalmente de práctica clínica para esquizofrenia, no obstante no se dispone de una guía colombiana ni de una apreciación de las guías desarrolladas en el mundo sobre esta patología. Método: En el marco del desarrollo de la Guía de práctica clínica sobre esquizofrenia para Colombia se realiza una búsqueda sistemática sobre GPC en diversas bases y se evalúan empleando la herramienta AGREE II por parte de 2 personas entrenadas para ello. Se presentan los resultados de esta fase de manera global y por dominios. Resultados: Se encontraron 164 resultados de posibles guías, de las cuales se evalúan finalmente 7 mediante AGREE II. Por dominios y calificación global la guía realizada por el National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) obtuvo el mejor puntaje. De las guías evaluadas, únicamente dos eran de América Latina y la mayoría (cuatro) de Europa. Solamente una de las guías evaluadas utilizó el abordaje GRADE para evaluar la calidad de la evidencia y formular las recomendaciones. Conclusión: La diversidad de guías encontrados sobre esquizofrenia no permite una fácil adopción ni adaptación de alguna guía por el médico psiquiatra de acuerdo con los parámetros que se han planteado para Colombia.
Introduction: Colombia is developing multiple national practice guidelines from a range of diseases. Clinical practice guidelines represent a very useful tool to be able to take decision over a patient care that is widely available for the clinician. In psychiatry there are a good number of international clinical guidelines for the treatment of schizophrenia nevertheless there is no article that evaluate them scientifically. Methods: In the settings of developing a Colombian schizophrenia practice guideline, a sys tematic search was performed in multiple databases and the results were then evaluated by two trained persons. We present the results globally and by domains. Results: We found 164 matches for possible guidelines. After screening 7 guidelines were evaluated with the AGREE IIinstrument. Globally and by the different domains, the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) was the guideline that got the best score. From the guidelines that were reviewed, 4 were from Europe and only 2 were from Latin America. None of the guidelines used GRADE methodology for the recommendations. Conclusion: The diversity of the schizophrenia treatment guidelines does not allow an easy adoption of the recommendation by a psychiatrist in Colombia.
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Esquizofrenia , Clasificación , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Toma de Decisiones , Psiquiatría , Terapéutica , Sistema Único de Salud , Salud Mental , Colombia , Gestión de la Calidad Total , Estándares de Referencia , Atención al PacienteRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Colombia is developing multiple national practice guidelines from a range of diseases. Clinical practice guidelines represent a very useful tool to be able to take decision over a patient care that is widely available for the clinician. In psychiatry there are a good number of international clinical guidelines for the treatment of schizophrenia nevertheless there is no article that evaluate them scientifically METHODS: In the settings of developing a Colombian schizophrenia practice guideline, a systematic search was performed in multiple databases and the results were then evaluated by two trained persons. We present the results globally and by domains. RESULTS: We found 164 matches for possible guidelines. After screening 7 guidelines were evaluated with the AGREE II instrument. Globally and by the different domains, the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) was the guideline that got the best score. From the guidelines that were reviewed, 4 were from Europe and only 2 were from Latin America. None of the guidelines used GRADE methodology for the recommendations. CONCLUSION: The diversity of the schizophrenia treatment guidelines does not allow an easy adoption of the recommendation by a psychiatrist in Colombia.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To determine the most effective pharmacological intervention and to bring recommendations for decision-making in the management of adults with schizophrenia with violent behavior or agitation. METHODS: A clinical practice guideline was elaborated under the parameters of the Methodological Guide of the Ministerio de Salud y Protección Social to identify, synthesize and evaluate the evidence and make recommendations about the treatment and follow-up of adult patients with schizophrenia. The evidence of NICE guide 82 was adopted and updated. The evidence was presented to the Guideline Developing Group and recommendations, employing the GRADE system, were produced. RESULTS: It is recommended the use of parenteral drugs in all agitated patient who does not respond to the measures of persuasion. The drugs with better evidence on effectiveness (control of violent behavior) are haloperidol and benzodiazepines, administered jointly or individually. Olanzapine is also an option considering that should only be used in institutions where a psychiatrist is available 24hours. Ziprasidone can be considered as a second-line drug. The information about the side effects associated with these drugs is insufficient and has low quality. CONCLUSION: Violent behavior in adults with schizophrenia represents a risk for themselves and for those around them, so the opportune implementation of interventions aimed to calm the patient, in order to prevent potential negative outcomes is necessary. It is recommended to initiate these interventions with measures of verbal persuasion, and if these measures are not effective, appropriate use of parenteral drugs: haloperidol and benzodiazepines as first-line and olanzapine and ziprasidone as second choices.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To determine the most adequate strategies for the prevention and treatment of the acute adverse effects of the use of antipsychotics. METHODS: A clinical practice guideline was elaborated under the parameters of the Methodological Guide of the Ministerio de Salud y Protección Social to identify, synthesize and evaluate the evidence and make recommendations about the treatment and follow-up of adult patients with schizophrenia. A systematic literature search was carried out. The evidence was presented to the Guideline Developing Group and recommendations, employing the GRADE system, were produced. RESULTS: The non-pharmacological interventions such as nutritional counseling by a nutritionist, exercise and psychotherapy are effective in preventing weight gain with the use of antipsychotics. (Kg Weight reduction in DM of -3.05 (-4.16, -1.94)). The antipsychotic change from olanzapine to aripiprazole showed weight loss and decreased BMI (decreased weight in KG DM -3.21 (-9.03, -2.61). The use of beta blockers was ineffective in reducing akathisia induced by antipsychotic; using as outcome the 50% reduction of symptoms of akathisia comparing beta-blockers with placebo RR was 1.4 (0.59, 1.83). CONCLUSION: It is recommended to make psychotherapeutic accompaniment and nutrition management of overweight for patients with weight gain. If these alternatives are ineffective is suggested to change the antipsychotic or consider starting metformin. For the management of drug-induced akathisia it is recommended to decrease the dose of the drug and the addition of lorazepam. It is recommended using 5mg biperiden IM or trihexyphenidyl 5mg orally in case of secondary acute dystonia and for the treatment of antipsychotic-induced parkinsonism to decrease the dose of antipsychotic or consider using 2 - 4mg/day of biperiden or diphenhydramine 50mg once daily.
RESUMEN
Objetivos: Determinar la probabilidad de riesgo suicida y/o enfermedad mental y factores asociados en estudiantes de secundaria de tres colegios bogotanos. Métodos: Estudio de corte transversal con 309 adolescentes. Resultados: El promedio de edad fue de 13,83 ± 0,9 años, predominó el género femenino (58,6%) y el estrato socioeconómico 3 (68,3%). La probabilidad de riesgo para comportamiento suicida y/o síntomas mentales fue de 47,6%; 26,5% tuvo alguna manifestación suicida; 14,23% tuvo ideación suicida en los últimos tres meses; 3,55% tuvo intentos suicidas alguna vez en la vida, y 8,73% tuvo ideación suicida e intentos suicidas en los últimos tres meses. El riesgo de comportamiento suicida y/o enfermedad mental fue explicado conjuntamente por la depresión (OR = 27,9, IC95% = 3,5-223,1), la baja autoestima (OR = 11,8, IC95% = 2,5-56,5), la disfunción familiar severa (OR = 3,4, IC95% = 1,2-9,7), el sexo femenino (OR = 2,1, IC95% = 1,2-3,8) y la edad mayor o igual a 15 años (OR = 1,9, IC95% = 0,9-3,9). El maltrato psicológico seguido del abuso físico se asociaron con manifestación suicida y/o enfermedad mental, y la buena relación familiar, con menor probabilidad. Conclusión: La depresión, la baja autoestima, la disfuncionalidad familiar, el género femenino, la edad > 15 y la violencia intrafamiliar son factores asociados al riesgo suicida y/o enfermedad mental en adolescentes, y las buenas relaciones familiares se asocian con menor riesgo.
Objective: To establish the probability for suicide risk and/or mental disorders, together with related factors among high school students in 3 schools in Bogota. Methods: Cross sectional study of 309 adolescents. Results: The average age was 13.83 ± 0.9, female dominance (58.6%) and a 3rd socioeconomic stratum (68.3%). The suicidal risk behavioral probability and/or mental symptoms was 47.6%, 26.5% exhibited some suicide manifestations, 14.23% had experienced suicidal ideas in the last 3 months, 3.55% had had suicide attempts at least once in life, and 8.73% had suicidal ideas in the last 3 months with suicide attempts. The risk of suicidal behavior and /or mental disorders was explained jointly by depression (OR=27.9, 95% CI: 3.5-223. 1), low self-esteem (OR=11.8, 95% CI: 2.5-56.5), severe family dysfunction (OR=3.4, 95%CI 1.2-9.7), being female (OR=2.1, 95% CI: 1.2-3.8) and being 15 or older (OR=1.9, 95% CI: 0.967-3.9). Psychological abuse followed by physical mistreatment was associated with suicidal behavior and /or mental illness while good family relationships were associated to lower probability. Conclusion: Depression, low self-esteem, severe family dysfunction, female gender, older age (> 15) and domestic violence are risk factors associated with suicide and/or mental disorders in adolescents; good family relationships are associated with lower risk.