RESUMEN
Aldose reductase is a NADP(H)-dependent enzyme, believed to be strongly implicated in the development of degenerative complications of Diabetes Mellitus. The search for specific inhibitors of this enzyme has thus become a major pharmaceutic challenge. In this study, we applied both X-ray crystallography and mass spectrometry to characterize the interactions between aldose reductase and four representative inhibitors: AminoSNM, Imirestat, LCB3071, and IDD384. If crystallography remains obviously the only way to get an extensive description of the contacts between an inhibitor and the enzymatic site, the duration of the crystallographic analysis makes this technique incompatible with high throughput screenings of inhibitors. On the other hand, dissociation experiments monitored by mass spectrometry permitted us to evaluate rapidly the relative gas-phase stabilities of the aldose reductase-inhibitor noncovalent complexes. In our experiments, dissociation in the gas-phase was provoked by increasing the accelerating voltage of the ions (Vc) in the source-analyzer interface region: the Vc value needed to dissociate 50% of the noncovalent complex initially present (Vc50) was taken as a gas-phase stability parameter of the enzyme-inhibitor complex. Interestingly, the Vc50 were found to correlate with the energy of the electrostatic and H-bond interactions involved in the contact aldose reductase/inhibitor (Eel-H), computed from the crystallographic model. This finding may be specially interesting in a context of drug development. Actually, during a drug design optimization phase, the binding of the drug to the target enzyme is often optimized by modifying its interatomic electrostatic and H-bond contacts; because they usually depend on a single atom change on the drug, and are easier to introduce than the hydrophobic interactions. Therefore, the Vc50 may help to monitor the chemical modifications introduced in new inhibitors. X-ray crystallography is clearly needed to get the details of the contacts and to rationalize the design. Nevertheless, once the cycle of chemical modification is engaged, mass spectrometry can be used to select a priori the drug candidates which are worthy of further crystallographic investigation. We thus propose to use the two techniques in a complementary way, to improve the screening of large collections of inhibitors.
Asunto(s)
Aldehído Reductasa/antagonistas & inhibidores , Inhibidores Enzimáticos/química , Aldehído Reductasa/aislamiento & purificación , Animales , Sitios de Unión , Cristalografía por Rayos X , Espectrometría de Masas , Modelos Moleculares , PorcinosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Aldose reductase (AR) is an NADPH-dependent enzyme implicated in long-term diabetic complications. Buried at the bottom of a deep hydrophobic cleft, the NADPH coenzyme is surrounded by the conserved hydrophilic residues of the AR active site. The existence of an anionic binding site near the NADP+ has been determined from the structures of the complexes of AR with citrate, cacodylate and glucose-6-phosphate. The inhibitor zopolrestat binds to this anionic site, and in the hydrophobic cleft, after a change of conformation which opens a 'specificity' pocket. RESULTS: The crystal structures of the porcine AR holoenzyme and its complexes with the inhibitors tolrestat and sorbinil have been solved; these structures are important as tolrestat and sorbinil are, pharmaceutically, the most well-studied AR inhibitors. The active site of the holoenzyme was analyzed, and binding of the inhibitors was found to involve two contact zones in the active site: first, a recognition region for hydrogen-bond acceptors near the coenzyme, with three centers, including the anionic site; and second, a hydrophobic contact zone in the active-site cleft, which in the case of tolrestat includes the specificity pocket. The conformational change leading to the opening of the specificity pocket upon tolrestat binding is different to the one seen upon zopolrestat binding; this pocket binds inhibitors that are more effective against AR than against aldehyde reductase. CONCLUSIONS: The active site of AR adapts itself to bind tightly to different inhibitors; this happens both upon binding to the inhibitor's hydrophilic heads, and at the hydrophobic and specificity pockets of AR, which can change their shape through different conformational changes of the same residues. This flexibility could explain the large variety of possible substrates of AR.