Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 9 de 9
Filtrar
Más filtros











Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Pediatr Crit Care Med ; 24(8): 662-669, 2023 08 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37102713

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To investigate outcomes associated with conventional roller or centrifugal pumps during neonatal venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). Our primary hypothesis is that in comparison with conventional roller-pump support, centrifugal pump use is associated with greater odds of survival. Our secondary hypothesis is that centrifugal pump use is associated with lesser odds of complications. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort identified using the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (ELSO) registry 2016 to 2020 dataset. SETTING: All ECMO centers reporting to the ELSO registry. PATIENTS: All neonates (≤ 28 d) supported with venovenous ECMO and cannulated via right internal jugular vein using dual-lumen venovenous cannulas and polymethyl pentene membrane oxygenators. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A total of 612 neonates (centrifugal, n = 340; conventional roller, n = 272) were included in the analysis. Using a multivariable logistic regression model, centrifugal pump use-as opposed to roller pump use-was associated with lesser odds of survival (odds ratio [OR], 0.53; 95% CI, 0.33-0.84; p < 0.008). Thrombosis and clots in the circuit components were also associated with lesser odds of survival (OR, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.16-0.60; p < 0.001). We failed to show that hemolysis was an independent variable for survival (OR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.31-1.19; p = 0.14). The primary diagnosis of neonatal aspiration/meconium aspiration is associated with more than seven-fold greater odds of survival (OR, 7.57; 95% CI, 4.02-15.74; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Contrary to our hypotheses, conventional roller pump use was associated with greater odds of survival. While thrombosis and clots in circuit components were independent variables for lesser odds of survival, further research is needed better to understand the use of centrifugal pumps in neonatal practice.


Asunto(s)
Oxigenación por Membrana Extracorpórea , Síndrome de Aspiración de Meconio , Femenino , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Oxigenación por Membrana Extracorpórea/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Oxigenadores de Membrana , Morbilidad
2.
Braz J Cardiovasc Surg ; 33(3): 224-232, 2018.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30043914

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Hemodilution is a concern in cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). Using a smaller dual tubing rather than a single larger inner diameter (ID) tubing in the venous limb to decrease prime volume has been a standard practice. The purpose of this study is to evaluate these tubing options. METHODS: Four different CPB circuits primed with blood (hematocrit 30%) were investigated. Two setups were used with two circuits for each one. In Setup I, a neonatal oxygenator was connected to dual 3/16" ID venous limbs (Circuit A) or to a single 1/4" ID venous limb (Circuit B); and in Setup II, a pediatric oxygenator was connected to dual 1/4" ID venous limbs (Circuit C) or a single 3/8" ID venous limb (Circuit D). Trials were conducted at arterial flow rates of 500 ml/min up to 1500 ml/min (Setup I) and up to 3000 ml/min (Setup II), at 36°C and 28°C. RESULTS: Circuit B exhibited a higher venous flow rate than Circuit A, and Circuit D exhibited a higher venous flow rate than Circuit C, at both temperatures. Flow resistance was significantly higher in Circuits A and C than in Circuits B (P<0.001) and D (P<0.001), respectively. CONCLUSION: A single 1/4" venous limb is better than dual 3/16" venous limbs at all flow rates, up to 1500 ml/min. Moreover, a single 3/8" venous limb is better than dual 1/4" venous limbs, up to 3000 ml/min. Our findings strongly suggest a revision of perfusion practice to include single venous limb circuits for CPB.


Asunto(s)
Cánula/normas , Puente Cardiopulmonar/instrumentación , Oxigenadores/normas , Velocidad del Flujo Sanguíneo/fisiología , Puente Cardiopulmonar/métodos , Diseño de Equipo , Seguridad de Equipos , Hemodilución , Humanos , Modelos Cardiovasculares , Pediatría/instrumentación , Estándares de Referencia , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Temperatura , Factores de Tiempo , Presión Venosa/fisiología
3.
Rev. bras. cir. cardiovasc ; Rev. bras. cir. cardiovasc;33(3): 224-232, May-June 2018. tab, graf
Artículo en Inglés | LILACS | ID: biblio-958406

RESUMEN

Abstract Objective: Hemodilution is a concern in cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). Using a smaller dual tubing rather than a single larger inner diameter (ID) tubing in the venous limb to decrease prime volume has been a standard practice. The purpose of this study is to evaluate these tubing options. Methods: Four different CPB circuits primed with blood (hematocrit 30%) were investigated. Two setups were used with two circuits for each one. In Setup I, a neonatal oxygenator was connected to dual 3/16" ID venous limbs (Circuit A) or to a single 1/4" ID venous limb (Circuit B); and in Setup II, a pediatric oxygenator was connected to dual 1/4" ID venous limbs (Circuit C) or a single 3/8" ID venous limb (Circuit D). Trials were conducted at arterial flow rates of 500 ml/min up to 1500 ml/min (Setup I) and up to 3000 ml/min (Setup II), at 36°C and 28°C. Results: Circuit B exhibited a higher venous flow rate than Circuit A, and Circuit D exhibited a higher venous flow rate than Circuit C, at both temperatures. Flow resistance was significantly higher in Circuits A and C than in Circuits B (P<0.001) and D (P<0.001), respectively. Conclusion: A single 1/4" venous limb is better than dual 3/16" venous limbs at all flow rates, up to 1500 ml/min. Moreover, a single 3/8" venous limb is better than dual 1/4" venous limbs, up to 3000 ml/min. Our findings strongly suggest a revision of perfusion practice to include single venous limb circuits for CPB.


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Oxigenadores/normas , Puente Cardiopulmonar/instrumentación , Cánula/normas , Pediatría/instrumentación , Estándares de Referencia , Temperatura , Factores de Tiempo , Presión Venosa/fisiología , Velocidad del Flujo Sanguíneo/fisiología , Puente Cardiopulmonar/métodos , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Diseño de Equipo , Seguridad de Equipos , Hemodilución , Modelos Cardiovasculares
5.
Braz J Cardiovasc Surg ; 31(5): 343-350, 2016.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27982342

RESUMEN

Objective: Usually only FDA-approved oxygenators are subject of studies by the international scientific community. The objective of this study is to evaluate two types of neonatal membrane oxygenators in terms of transmembrane pressure gradient, hemodynamic energy transmission and gaseous microemboli capture in simulated cardiopulmonary bypass systems. Methods: We investigated the Braile Infant 1500 (Braile Biomédica, São José do Rio Preto, Brazil), an oxygenator commonly used in Brazilian operating rooms, and compared it to the Dideco Kids D100 (Sorin Group, Arvada, CO, USA), that is an FDA-approved and widely used model in the USA. Cardiopulmonary bypass circuits were primed with lactated Ringer's solution and packed red blood cells (Hematocrit 40%). Trials were conducted at flow rates of 500 ml/min and 700 ml/min at 35ºC and 25ºC. Real-time pressure and flow data were recorded using a custom-based data acquisition system. For gaseous microemboli testing, 5cc of air were manually injected into the venous line. Gaseous microemboli were recorded using the Emboli Detection and Classification Quantifier. Results: Braile Infant 1500 had a lower pressure drop (P<0.01) and a higher total hemodynamic energy delivered to the pseudopatient (P<0.01). However, there was a higher raw number of gaseous microemboli seen prior to oxygenator at lower temperatures with the Braile oxygenator compared to the Kids D100 (P<0.01). Conclusion: Braile Infant 1500 oxygenator had a better hemodynamic performance compared to the Dideco Kids D100 oxygenator. Braile had more gaseous microemboli detected at the pre-oxygenator site under hypothermia, but delivered a smaller percentage of air emboli to the pseudopatient than the Dideco oxygenator.


Asunto(s)
Puente Cardiopulmonar/métodos , Embolia Aérea/prevención & control , Hemodinámica/fisiología , Oxigenadores de Membrana/normas , Diseño de Equipo , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Modelos Cardiovasculares
6.
Rev. bras. cir. cardiovasc ; Rev. bras. cir. cardiovasc;31(5): 343-350, Sept.-Oct. 2016. tab, graf
Artículo en Inglés | LILACS | ID: biblio-829751

RESUMEN

Abstract Objective: Usually only FDA-approved oxygenators are subject of studies by the international scientific community. The objective of this study is to evaluate two types of neonatal membrane oxygenators in terms of transmembrane pressure gradient, hemodynamic energy transmission and gaseous microemboli capture in simulated cardiopulmonary bypass systems. Methods: We investigated the Braile Infant 1500 (Braile Biomédica, São José do Rio Preto, Brazil), an oxygenator commonly used in Brazilian operating rooms, and compared it to the Dideco Kids D100 (Sorin Group, Arvada, CO, USA), that is an FDA-approved and widely used model in the USA. Cardiopulmonary bypass circuits were primed with lactated Ringer's solution and packed red blood cells (Hematocrit 40%). Trials were conducted at flow rates of 500 ml/min and 700 ml/min at 35ºC and 25ºC. Real-time pressure and flow data were recorded using a custom-based data acquisition system. For gaseous microemboli testing, 5cc of air were manually injected into the venous line. Gaseous microemboli were recorded using the Emboli Detection and Classification Quantifier. Results: Braile Infant 1500 had a lower pressure drop (P<0.01) and a higher total hemodynamic energy delivered to the pseudopatient (P<0.01). However, there was a higher raw number of gaseous microemboli seen prior to oxygenator at lower temperatures with the Braile oxygenator compared to the Kids D100 (P<0.01). Conclusion: Braile Infant 1500 oxygenator had a better hemodynamic performance compared to the Dideco Kids D100 oxygenator. Braile had more gaseous microemboli detected at the pre-oxygenator site under hypothermia, but delivered a smaller percentage of air emboli to the pseudopatient than the Dideco oxygenator.


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Recién Nacido , Oxigenadores de Membrana/normas , Puente Cardiopulmonar/métodos , Embolia Aérea/prevención & control , Hemodinámica/fisiología , Diseño de Equipo , Modelos Cardiovasculares
8.
Pediatr Crit Care Med ; 15(7): 600-7, 2014 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24977688

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Modified ultrafiltration is used to ameliorate the deleterious effects of cardiopulmonary bypass in pediatric cardiac surgery patients. The ideal duration of modified ultrafiltration has not been established yet. We investigated the effects of extended duration of modified ultrafiltration on pulmonary functions and hemodynamics in the early postoperative period in newborns and infants who had transposition of great arteries operations. DESIGN: Single-center prospective randomized study. SETTING: Pediatric cardiac surgery operating room and ICU. PATIENTS: Sixty newborns and infants who had been scheduled to undergo transposition of great arteries operation. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Modified ultrafiltration was applied to all patients following the termination of cardiopulmonary bypass (for 10, 15, and 20 min in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively). Pulmonary compliance, gas exchange capacity, hemodynamic measurements, inotropic support, blood loss, transfusion requirements, hematocrit level, and duration of ventilatory support were measured after intubation, at termination of cardiopulmonary bypass, at the end of modified ultrafiltration, and in the 1st, 6th, 12th, and 24th hours after admission to ICU. The amount of fluid removed by modified ultrafiltration in groups 2 and 3 was larger than that of group 1 (p < 0.01). Systolic blood pressure was significantly increased at the end of modified ultrafiltration in group 3 compared to groups 1 and 2 (p < 0.05). Hematocrit levels were significantly increased at the end of modified ultrafiltration in groups 2 and 3 compared to group 1 (p < 0.01). Therefore, RBCs were transfused less after modified ultrafiltration in groups 2 and 3 compared to group 1 (p < 0.05). Static and dynamic compliance, oxygen index, and ventilation index had improved similarly in all three groups at the end of modified ultrafiltration (p > 0.05) CONCLUSIONS:: Modified ultrafiltration acutely improved pulmonary compliance and gas exchange in all groups. Increased hematocrit and blood pressure levels were also observed in the longer modified ultrafiltration group. However, extended duration of modified ultrafiltration did not have a significant impact on duration of intubation or the stay in ICU.


Asunto(s)
Puente Cardiopulmonar , Cuidado Intensivo Neonatal , Transposición de los Grandes Vasos/cirugía , Ultrafiltración/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Rendimiento Pulmonar , Masculino , Cuidados Posoperatorios , Estudios Prospectivos , Intercambio Gaseoso Pulmonar , Factores de Tiempo , Transposición de los Grandes Vasos/fisiopatología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA