RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Belief in divine control is often assumed to be fatalistic. However, the assumption has rarely been investigated in racial/ethnic minorities. OBJECTIVES: This study aims to examine the association between belief in divine control and coping and how the association was moderated by ethnicity/acculturation in a multi-ethnic sample of breast cancer patients. METHODS: Latina, African American, and non-Hispanic White older women with newly diagnosed breast cancer (N=257) from a population-based survey completed the scale of Belief in Divine Control and the Brief COPE. RESULTS: Belief in divine control was positively related to approach coping (i.e., positive reframing, active coping, and planning) in all ethnic groups. Belief in divine control was positively related to acceptance and negatively related to avoidance coping (i.e., denial and behavioral disengagement) among low-acculturated Latinas. CONCLUSIONS: Negative presumptions about fatalistic implications of belief in divine control should be critically reappraised, especially when such skepticism is applied to racial/ethnic minority patients.
Asunto(s)
Adaptación Psicológica , Neoplasias de la Mama/psicología , Cultura , Religión y Medicina , Mujeres/psicología , Aculturación , Negro o Afroamericano/psicología , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Encuestas Epidemiológicas , Hispánicos o Latinos/psicología , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Población Blanca/psicologíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To examine racial/ethnic disparities in older women's health-related quality of life (QoL) and type of breast cancer treatment as mediated by physician-level and individual-level variables. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey of a population-based, consecutive sample identified through the Los Angeles Cancer Surveillance Program of Latina (n = 99), African American (n = 66), and White (n = 92) women aged 55 years or older (N = 257) between 3 and 9 months after primary breast cancer diagnosis and at least 1 month posttreatment. An exploratory, empirically developed latent variable model tested the relationships among demographic and physician-related variables, patient attitudes, and health-related outcomes. Health-related outcomes included QoL measures and receipt of breast conserving surgery (BCS). RESULTS: Latinas reported less BCS and poorer QoL compared with Whites. Physician communication that can empower patients, in terms of patient efficacy in patient?physician interactions and breast cancer knowledge, mitigated racial/ethnic disparities in receipt of BCS. Physician emotional support was not related to patient cognitive empowerment and treatment outcomes. Medical mistrust in minority women was related to less self-efficacy and less positive coping, as well as, both directly and indirectly, to reduced QoL. Latinas reported poorer QoL in the tested model. CONCLUSION: Physician communication style, specifically information giving and participatory decision making, may empower older women with breast cancer and help mitigate racial/ethnic disparities in surgical treatment received.
Asunto(s)
Actitud Frente a la Salud , Neoplasias de la Mama/etnología , Neoplasias de la Mama/terapia , Comunicación , Conductas Relacionadas con la Salud , Relaciones Médico-Paciente , Poder Psicológico , Adaptación Psicológica , Anciano , Estudios Transversales , Toma de Decisiones , Femenino , Hispánicos o Latinos/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Mastectomía , Persona de Mediana Edad , Factores Socioeconómicos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Health care disparities have been identified in the treatment of older and racial/ethnic minority breast carcinoma patients. The purpose of the current study was to examine racial/ethnic group differences in the treatment decision-making process of older breast carcinoma patients and the differential impact on treatment received. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was conducted of a population-based, consecutive sample identified by the Los Angeles Cancer Surveillance Program comprised of Latina (n = 99), African-American (n = 66), and white (n = 92) women age > or = 55 years (total n = 257) and who were between 3-9 months after their primary breast carcinoma diagnosis. RESULTS: Approximately 49% of less acculturated Latinas and 18% of more acculturated Latinas indicated that their family members determined the final treatment decision, compared with less than 4% of African-Americans and whites (P < 0.001). This disparity remained in multiple logistic regression analysis, controlling for potential confounders, including sociodemographic, physician-patient communication, social support, and health variables. Compared with African-American and white women, Latina women were more likely to identify a family member as the final treatment decision-maker (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] of 7.97; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 2.43-26.20, for less acculturated Latinas; and AOR of 4.48; 95% CI, 1.09-18.45, for more acculturated Latinas). A multiple logistic regression model, controlling for sociodemographic and health characteristics, indicated that patients were less likely to receive breast-conserving surgery (BCS) when the family made the final treatment decision (AOR of 0.39; 95% CI, 0.18-0.85). CONCLUSIONS: Family appears to play a powerful role in treatment decision-making among older Latina breast carcinoma patients, regardless of the level of acculturation. This family influence appears to contribute to racial/ethnic group differences in treatment received. Physicians should acknowledge and educate patients' family members as potential key participants in medical decision-making, rather than merely as translators and providers of social support.
Asunto(s)
Negro o Afroamericano , Neoplasias de la Mama/etnología , Neoplasias de la Mama/terapia , Carcinoma/etnología , Carcinoma/terapia , Salud de la Familia , Hispánicos o Latinos , Planificación de Atención al Paciente , Población Blanca , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Estudios Transversales , Características Culturales , Toma de Decisiones , Femenino , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Los Angeles , Persona de Mediana Edad , Educación del Paciente como AsuntoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: (1) To examine the mental health of older women with breast cancer in relation to support provided by, and the adjustment of, significant others including partners, children, and other family members or friends and (2) to document how often physicians address the women's significant others and the helpfulness of doing so. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey of newly diagnosed breast cancer patients aged 55 years or older (n = 222) was conducted. RESULTS: Partners, and in many instances children and other family members or friends, provided support. Support from partners and adjustment of both partners and children independently predicted less depression and anxiety among the study participants. For racial/ethnic minorities, support from, and adjustment of, adult children assumed particular importance. Nonetheless, women reported that their physicians rarely asked their significant others how they were coping (15%) or referred them to a support group (3%), even though both behaviors were rated as extremely helpful. CONCLUSION: For older women with breast cancer, both partners and adult children were important sources of support and their adjustment affected the women's mental health. Support sources and their impact on women's mental health varied among racial/ethnic groups, suggesting the importance of culturally sensitive provision of care by clinicians.
Asunto(s)
Adaptación Psicológica , Neoplasias de la Mama/psicología , Neoplasias de la Mama/terapia , Salud Mental , Apoyo Social , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios Transversales , Relaciones Familiares , Femenino , Encuestas Epidemiológicas , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Relaciones Padres-Hijo , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To identify the impact of patient age and patient-physician communication on older breast cancer patients' participation in treatment decision-making. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional survey of breast cancer patients aged 55 years or older (n = 222) in Los Angeles County. Patients received a breast cancer diagnosis between 1998 and 2000, and were interviewed on average 7.1 months (SD = 2.9) from diagnosis. All patient-physician communication variables were measured by patient self-report. Patient participation in treatment decision-making was defined by (1) questioning the surgeon about treatment, and (2) perception of self as the final decision-maker. RESULTS: In multiple logistic regression analyses, surgeons' specific solicitation of patients' input about treatment preferences had positive relationships with both dimensions of patient participation in decision-making, that is, questioning the surgeon (adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 2.09, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.05-4.16) and perceiving oneself to be the final decision-maker (OR = 2.38, CI = 1.08-5.28), controlling for patients' sociodemographic and case-mix characteristics and social support. Greater emotional support from surgeons was negatively associated with patient perception of being the final decision-maker. Physicians' information-giving and patient age were not associated with the participation measures. However, greater patient-perceived self-efficacy in patient-physician interactions was related to participation. CONCLUSION: In breast cancer patients aged 55 years and older, surgeons' solicitation of patients' treatment preferences was a powerful independent predictor of patient participation in treatment decision-making, as was patient's self-efficacy in interacting with physicians. Increasing both physicians' and patients' partnership-building skills might enhance the quality of treatment decision-making and treatment outcomes in this burgeoning patient population.