Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Acta Gastroenterol Latinoam ; 45(1): 24-30, 2015 Mar.
Artículo en Español | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26076510

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Colonoscopy is the standard method for the evaluation of the colon. A suitable intestinal cleaning is critical for the effectiveness and security of the procedure, but unfortunately there is a high proportion of suboptimal bowel preparation. OBJECTIVE: To identify factors related to suboptimal bowel preparation. METHODS: We performed an analytic, observational, cross-sectional and prospective study. We included all outpatients scheduled for colonoscopy in the Peruvian-Japanese Health Center between January and July 2012. We excluded patients with a complete or partial colonic resection. In patients with two or more colonoscopies during the study interval, only the first procedure was considered. Aronchick scale was used in assessment of bowel cleaning. The variables studied with relationship to bowel preparation were: age, sex, grade ofeducation, body mass index, time of examination, history (diabetes mellitus, stroke, cirrhosis, use of antidepressants/anxiolytics, number of bowel movements per week, abdominal surgery, personal history of previous colonoscopy, polyps and colon cancer, family history of colon cancer), received purgative, additional laxative, indication for colonoscopy and adverse effects of the preparation. Statistical analysis was made with SPSS v.160. For the categorical variables we used chi square test or Fisher exact test, whereas for continuous variables the Mann Whitney test was used. The variables significantly associated with suboptimal preparation in the univariated analysis were included in a multivariate analysis using logistic regression. RESULTS: We included 841 patients. The bowel preparation was suboptimal in 438 patients (52.1%). The univariate analysis showed that the factors related to suboptimal preparation were age (P = 0.023) and body mass index ≥ 30 kg/m2 (P = 0.021). The multivariate analysis confirmed that age ≥ 70 years old (P = 0.001) and body mass index ≥ 30 kg/m2 (P = 0.010) were the variables related to suboptimal bowel preparation. CONCLUSIONS: Age greater than 70 years old and obesity are factors related to suboptimal bowel preparation.


Asunto(s)
Catárticos/administración & dosificación , Colonoscopía/normas , Cooperación del Paciente , Polietilenglicoles/administración & dosificación , Adulto , Anciano , Colonoscopía/métodos , Neoplasias Colorrectales/diagnóstico , Estudios Transversales , Escolaridad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Irrigación Terapéutica
2.
Acta Gastroenterol Latinoam ; 41(4): 288-95, 2011 Dec.
Artículo en Español | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22292224

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Colonoscopy is the gold standard for the diagnosis of diseases of the colon and rectum and the primary prevention test for colon cancer. The main indicators of quality in colonoscopy are the rate of complete colonoscopy and the rate of detected adenomas. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to know the rates of cecal intubation and detection of adenomas and to identify factors related to these two quality indicators in colonoscopies performed in the Peruvian Japanese Policlinic during 2007. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A correlational cross-sectional and retrospective study was performed. Data were collected from the colonoscopies performed by 10 endoscopists in the Peruvian Japanese Policlinic during 2007. RESULTS: We included 843 colonoscopies. Cecal intubation was achieved in 801 patients (95%). The multivariate analysis found that cecal intubation was correlated with the type of sedation/analgesia and the quality of bowel preparation. At least one adenoma was detected in 168 colonoscopies (19.9%). Multivariate analysis found that age, colonic cleansing and time of withdrawal were factors significantly associated with the detection of adenomas. CONCLUSIONS: The quality of colonoscopy depends on several factors: bowel preparation, type of sedation/analgesia and time of withdrawal. These are the targets on which we can act to improve performance.


Asunto(s)
Colonoscopía/normas , Indicadores de Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Adenoma/diagnóstico , Adulto , Anciano , Ciego , Colonoscopía/métodos , Neoplasias Colorrectales/diagnóstico , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Intubación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Perú , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Tiempo
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA